Over the last 10 years or more now, we have been watching unbelievable and disconcerting things happening in our rivers and oceans. Just search on google for fish die offs, beached whales, blood red rivers, blood red oceans, shark invasions, trash islands, dead coral reefs, and of course deadly bacteria and micro-organisms making our beaches and rivers unsafe. This is VERY ALARMING, as water is crucial for life. These things have been occurring so frequently in this last decade that people have come to accept this phenomenon as NORMAL… IT IT NOT!
People have throughout history gone to the shore (river or ocean) for drinking water, for fish, for bathing, for swimming, for travel. More recently, our waters have been a major place for entertainment, surfing, sailing, canoeing, kayaking, scuba diving, snorkeling, jet skiing, paddle-boarding, pari-sailing, etc. Countless ways that we enjoy our water ways. Of course, just simply wading in the water or dangling our feet off of docks and enjoying the lovely view, or strolling the beaches collecting seashells. WATER has played many important roles in our lives. BUT today, we are being made to FEAR the water. Or at least they want to limit our access to it. Let’s take a look at some of the issues that have become of issue.
Cyanobacteria
This type of bacteria creates oxygen. Oxygen is what we breath. Breath is life. There seems to be some very important significance to this bacteria. Those whose religion is Scientism want you to believe the lie that is Evolution and therefore this bacteria is responsible for life. However, the TRUTH is that The Creator created a perfect world, perfectly in balance. Every single cell is a tiny world in itself, and everything was created to work perfectly together. To be regenerative, self healing and self supporting.
spacer
Those who practice Scientism are constantly playing with things that they do not fully understand. Experimentation is their life. Regardless of any possible negative or even disastrous results, their inquiring minds are driven to push onward. They are not at all concerned with the welfare of the general public, demonstrated by the fact that they keep secret what they already know, and what they are attempting to do with what they know, until they are forced by some extenuating circumstance to reveal these facts. Thinking themselves so high above the general public, they determine that you are incapable of dealing with the things that they know. So, they feel justified in keeping their experiments occult, even if the information could possibly save or endanger lives.
They have studying, experimenting and inventing for a very long time. There is no telling what bizarre perversions they have created in our environment. We see are able to see some of the evidence of their experimentation in the disastrous events and developments we witness in our earth today. They would have you believe that all these things are natural and quite normal, or if not that they have been created by the callous, thoughtless, destructive actions of the general public.
Because we benefit to some degree from some of what they develop we have come to believe that these people are working on our behalf. Satan ALWAYS offers something attractive, how else would he get you to buy into the lie?? The TRUTH is they have a dark agenda behind what they are doing. Many of them do not even know this is true. They think they are working for the greater good, but the SPIRITUAL FORCES behind them are what is really driving them. Since most people who pursue Science do not believe in the CREATOR, they CANNOT know the TRUTH of any matter. TRUTH is revealed by the power of the HOLY SPIRIT. Many “scientists” not only do not believe in the Creator, they believe and worship Pagan Gods. Why, because they do not have the Holy Spirit, they are open to the influence of Demonic Spirits. Those spirits are worshiped in Paganism and are the spirits behind the “Arts, Sciences and Crafts” . Please see my series Gifts from the Fallen – Part 2 – Arts, Sciences and Crafts
If you have any doubt about how far they have come in their experimentation with our environment, take a look at this application. Ask yourself, how long it took to gather the information, experiment with it, analyze it classify it and prepare the program for storing the information so that they could make it available to you. Then ask yourself how much they know and are not sharing. Then ask yourself how much they do not know about the consequences and effects of their experimentation.
The Magic of Chemistry – with Andrew Szydlo
3,185,831 views
•Jun 4, 2014
Now consider all these recent events and developments in our environment. Again, they will try to convince you these are natural and normal, or they are YOU FAULT, and due to pollution caused by YOU.
The truth is these are not normal, these are catastrophic developments. I suggest you do your own research and see for yourself how many different places are now terrorized by these microbes. I grew up in a world where these things were UNHEARD OF! I know I am old, but I am not that old!
spacer
Pfiesteria piscida
spacer
Vibrio Vulnificus
Feb 21, 2020
Terraforming or terraformation (literally, “Earth-shaping”) of a planet, moon, or other body is the hypothetical process of deliberately modifying its atmosphere, temperature, surface topography or ecology to be similar to the environment of Earth to make it habitable by Earth-like life.
The concept of terraforming developed from both science fiction and actual science. The term was coined by Jack Williamson in a science-fiction short story (“Collision Orbit“) published during 1942 in Astounding Science Fiction,[1] but the concept may pre-date this work.
Even if the environment of a planet could be altered deliberately, the feasibility of creating an unconstrained planetary environment that mimics Earth on another planet has yet to be verified. Mars is usually considered to be the most likely candidate for terraforming. Much study has been done concerning the possibility of heating the planet and altering its atmosphere, and NASA has even hosted debates on the subject. Several potential methods of altering the climate of Mars may fall within humanity’s technological capabilities, but at present the economic resources required to do so are far beyond that which any government or society is willing to allocate to it. The long timescales and practicality of terraforming are the subject of debate. Other unanswered questions relate to the ethics, logistics, economics, politics, and methodology of altering the environment of an extraterrestrial world.
Terraforming Earth: Geoengineering megaplan starts now
Transforming Earth
THIS is how we will hold off disaster. To help us avoid dangerous climate change, we will need to create the largest industry in history: to suck greenhouse gases out of the air on a giant scale. For the first time, we can sketch out this future industry – known as geoengineering – and identify where it would operate.
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change now considers geoengineering to be respectable. The reason is simple. Unless our greenhouse gas emissions start falling soon, Earth will probably warm this century by more than 2 °C, at which point things get nasty – because human society might not be able to adapt. But emissions are still rising. The upshot is we urgently need ways to suck CO2 out of the air. This was the subject of the Oxford Conference on Negative Emission Technologies, held last month in the UK.
In conjunction with scientists attending that meeting, we’ve assessed the effectiveness – and cost – of the most likely methods. They include planting trees, shovelling crushed rock into the ocean, and building millions of chemical “sponges” to pull gas out of the air (see diagram to find out about each technique).
Alone, such CO2-suckers can only handle a fraction of emissions. So we will need several. “If we don’t employ some of these technologies, we will go above 2 °C,” says Richard Lampitt of the UK National Oceanography Centre in Southampton. “A programme of multiple negative emissions technologies could perhaps store a few billion tonnes of carbon per year by mid-century, and conceivably as much as 5 or 10 billion tonnes,” says John Shepherd, also at the UK National Oceanography Centre.
“If we don’t employ some of these technologies, we will go above 2 °C”
So by 2100, CO2-suckers might just mop up the equivalent of what our annual emissions are now. But there are big costs, even putting money to one side. The biological approaches will cover vast areas of land, pressurising farms and wildlife, while the high-tech approaches will burn lots of energy.
There are other problems. It is hard to verify if plants and oceans are trapping CO2. We need underground space to store the gas. And many techniques could harm ecosystems. Worse, pulling CO2 from the air makes it progressively harder to suck out more, so the methods get less efficient over time (Carbon Management, doi.org/dbkhqh). And models show that removing CO2 from the air affects land plants, too. “They grow more slowly and take up less carbon,” says Andreas Oschlies of the Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research in Kiel, Germany.
That means we have to start soon: with immediate research to assess safety, and roll-out within 20 years. Some methods, like tree-planting, can begin now; others may be decades away (Process Safety and Environmental Protection, doi.org/n33). On top of all this, CO2-suckers are pointless unless paired with dramatic emissions cuts. If not, even a major programme of ocean liming beginning in 2020 would have little effect.
It ain’t cheap. As a rough estimate, it will cost several trillion dollars a year – a few per cent of global GDP. And it only makes economic sense with serious incentives, such as a high carbon price. But with a combination of CO2 reduction and geoengineering, we might just miss the worst of climate change. The bottom line is that CO2-suckers are essential, but we also need to ditch fossil fuels quickly. It’s that or climate havoc.
This article appeared in print under the headline “Transforming Earth”
spacer