Some of you may already be aware of this truth. Some of you may not. It is a very important part of this entire issue. Though you may know about Roman/Maritime Law, there are still some things in this article that you need to see. So, please stay with me.
Maritime Law (Law) may be distinguished from the Law of the Sea, which is a body of public international law dealing with navigational rights, mineral rights, jurisdiction over coastal waters, and the maritime relationships between nations. The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea has been adopted by 167 countries and the European Union, and disputes are resolved at the ITLOS tribunal in Hamburg.
Proof That All People Born Since 1933 Are ‘Slaves’ Or ‘Cargo’ — And It’s All LegalYou are “legally” a slave, just as your parents, your grandparents, and great-grandparents were slaves. You may be lucky enough to live in a pleasant plantation with other slaves, managed by overseer slaves such as police, judges, doctors, and politicians where few examples of slave cruelty occur. The fact that you are a slave is unquestionable. The only unknown is whether you will permit your children and their children to also grow up as slaves.
UPDATE: Video added 2/22/19
148 – The Uncommon Law of the Land and Sea
Spiritual Significance of Straw
The signification of chaff or straw is truths of memory-knowledge (AC 3114), and indeed memory-knowledges the lowest and most general of all, for the lowest food in a spiritual sense is straw or chaff because it is the food of beasts. Those knowledge are called lowest which are full of fallacies of the senses, which the evil abuse to pervert goods and truths, and thus to defend evils and falsities; for on account of fallacies these knowledges can be turned in favor of principles of falsity and of cupidities of evil. Moreover, such knowledges are the most general of all, and unless they are filled with truths less general and more particular, they may be of service to falsities and evils, but in proportion, as they are filled with truths, they are of less service to them. Such are the knowledges whereby they who in the world have professed faith alone, and yet have lived a life of evil, infest the upright n the other life; but as these knowledges are dispelled by the angels, it is now said that they should not give straw to make brick, that is, that they did not add these to the fictitious and false things that would be injected. Such is the internal sense of these words, which indeed appears remote from the sense of the letter; but be it known that there is nothing in the natural world which does not correspond to something in the spiritual world, and the angels with a man understand all things spiritually which the man understands naturally; they do not know what straw is, nor bricks; such things were known to them when they were in the world, but were forgotten when they came into heaven, because there they put on spiritual things. Hence it is that when the angels perceive the ideas of such things with a man, they turn them into corresponding spiritual things. That straw or grass denotes the lowest memory-knowledge, and that bricks denote things fictitious and false, can be seen from many considerations; for all herbage and straw have no other signification; but seeds, barley, wheat, and the like denote interior truths and goods; and stones not artificial denote truths.
If you watched the Gothard Tunnel Opening, then you likely were wondering what the heck were those weird creatures that look like piles of hay? I believe this may be the answer to that question. I know this entire production was an evil witchcraft spell casting work. Every single aspect of this “ceremony” was meant to have an impact in the spirit. Watch a Portion of the Tunnel Opening
Straw man – From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article is about the logical fallacy. For other uses, see Straw man (disambiguation).
A straw man is a common form of argument and is an informal fallacy based on giving the impression of refuting an opponent’s argument, while actually refuting an argument that was not presented by that opponent. One who engages in this fallacy is said to be “attacking a straw man.”
The typical straw man argument creates the illusion of having completely refuted or defeated an opponent’s proposition through the covert replacement of it with a different proposition (i.e., “stand up a straw man”) and the subsequent refutation of that false argument (“knock down a straw man”) instead of the opponent’s proposition.
This technique has been used throughout history in polemical debate, particularly in arguments about highly charged emotional issues where a fiery “battle” and the defeat of an “enemy” may be more valued than critical thinking or an understanding of both sides of the issue.
Straw man tactics in the United Kingdom can be known as an Aunt Sally, after a pub game of the same name, where patrons threw sticks or battens at a post to knock off a skittle balanced on top.
A Life of Slavery — You Are NOT Born Free (for more info click HERE)
You are a slave because since 1933, upon a new child being borne, the Executors or Administrators of the higher Estate willingly and knowingly convey the beneficial entitlements of the child as Beneficiary into the 1st Cestui Que (Vie) Trust in the form of a Registry Number by registering the Name, thereby also creating the Corporate Person and denying the child any rights as an owner of Real Property.
You are a slave because since 1933 when a child is borne, the Executors or Administrators of the higher Estate knowingly and willingly claim the baby as chattel to the Estate.
The slave baby contract is then created by honoring the ancient tradition of either having the ink impression of the feet of the baby onto the live birth record or a drop of its blood as well as tricking the parents to signing the baby away through the deceitful legal meanings on the live birth record.
This live birth record as a promissory note is converted into a slave bond sold to the private reserve bank of the estate and then conveyed into a 2nd and separate Cestui Que (Vie) Trust per child owned by the bank.
Upon the promissory note reaching maturity and the bank being unable to “seize” the slave child, a maritime lien is lawfully issued to “salvage” the lost property and itself monetized as currency issued in series against the Cestui Que (Vie) Trust.
You are a slave because since 1540 and the creation of the 1st Cestui Que Act, deriving its power from the Papal Bull of Roman Cult leader Pope Paul III of the same year, whenever a child is baptized and a Baptismal Certificate is issued by the state at birth or church, the parents have knowingly or unknowingly gifted, granted and conveyed the soul of the baby to a “3rd” Cestui Que Vie Trust owner by Roman Cult, who has held this valuable property in its vaults ever since, managed by the Temple Bar since 1540 and subsequent Bar Associations from the 19th Century representing the reconstituted “Galla” responsible as Grim Reapers for reaping the souls, or salvage also known as “salvation of souls”.
Therefore under the UCC Slave Laws which most slave plantations of the world operate you can never own a house, even though they trick into believing you do; you never really own a car, or boat or any other object, only have the benefit of use.
Indeed, you do not even own your own body, which is claimed to have been lawfully gifted by your parents at your birth in the traditions of old slave contracts in which the slave baby had its feet or hands dipped in ink, or a drop of blood spilt on the commercial transaction document we know as the live birth record, against which a CUSIP number is issued and sold to the central bank.
Yes, the banks claim your flesh, the banks are indeed the modern slave owners, hiding these indisputable facts upon which their money system is built from the people.
You may not realize you are a slave under the slave laws of Uniform Commercial Codes (UCC), but may still erroneously believe you are a slave with “more rights” as used to be afforded under “Common Law” until it was largely abolished back in 1933 without properly telling you.
The word “common” comes from 14th Century Latin communis meaning “to entrust, commit to a burden, public duty, service or obligation”. The word was created from the combination of two ancient pre-Vatican Latin words com/comitto = “to entrust, commit” and munis = “burden, public duty, service or obligation”.
In other words, the real meaning of common as first formed because of the creation of the Roman Trust over the planet is the concept of “voluntary servitude” or simply “voluntary enslavement”.
Common Law is nothing more than the laws of “voluntary servitude” and the laws of “voluntary slavery” to the Roman Cult and the Venetian Slavemasters.
It is the job of the overseer slaves to convince you that you are not slaves, the common law still exists and has not been largely abolished and replaced with commercial law, to confuse you, to give you false hope.
In return, they are rewarded as loyal slaves with bigger homes to use and more privileges than other slaves.
The reason why the overseer slaves such as judges, politicians, bankers, actors, and media personalities are forced to lie and deny we are all slaves is because the slave system of voluntary servitude or “common law” was not the first global slave system, but merely its evolution.
Before the emergence of Common Law, we were all subject to being considered mere animals or things under Canon Law of the Roman Cult, also known as the Law of the Sea, or Admiralty Law.
Under Admiralty Law, you are either a slave of the ship of state or merely cargo for lawful salvage. Thus in 1302 through Unam Sanctam, the Roman Cult unlawfully claimed through trust the ownership of all the planet and all living “things” as either slaves or less than slaves with things administered through the Court of Rota.
This court, claimed as the Supreme Court of all Courts on the planet was initially abolished in the 16th Century only to be returned in 1908 under Pope Pius X as a purely spiritual ecclesiastical court of 12 “apostolic prothonotary” spirits, implying the twelve apostles.
Since then, this new purely spiritual court has remained in constant “session”, with the local courts using these powers to administer Divine Immortal Spirits expressed in Trust into Flesh Vessels as mere dead things.
Yet this is not the only form of slave law still in force today. Instead, the oldest, the most evil and based on false history are the slave laws of the Menasheh, also known as the Rabbi through the unholy document of hate first formed in 333 known as the Talmud of the Menasheh- the false Israelites.
Through the Talmud of the false Israelites, the whole planet is enslaved with the servants of the “chosen people” known as Caananites or K-nights (Knights) also known as the Scythians and then the rest as the goy/gyu and goyim – namely meaning the cattle, the dead lifeless corpses.
Ultimately, you are a slave because you remain profoundly influenced by your education and community at large and because many choose to continue to think and act like a slave, waiting for someone to help them, tell them what to do and be happy accepting bread crumbs of benefits when the system has reaped millions of dollars – yes millions of dollars – of your energy.
Ask yourself whether you’re organizing a Baptism for your child because you were Baptised, you think it’s the right thing to do, or your in-laws are putting pressure on you.
To understand the real reasons you are encouraged to baptize your child, you first need to understand the background of Trusts.
If you like what you read, go ahead; if you have second thoughts have a simple family ceremony with no formal baptismal certificate issued. The Government won’t like it but will God care? Not a bit!
History of Trusts:
The 1st Trust of the World
Unam Sanctam is one of the most frightening documents of history and the one most quoted as the primary document of the popes claiming their global power.
It is an express trust deed. The last line reads:
“Furthermore, we declare, we proclaim, we define that it is absolutely necessary for salvation that every human creature be subject to the Roman Pontiff.”
It is not only the first trust deed in history but also the largest trust ever conceived, as it claims the whole planet and everything on it, conveyed in trust.
Triple Crown of Ba’al, aka the Papal Tiara and Triregnum
In 1302 Pope Boniface issued his infamous Papal Bull Unam Sanctam – the first Express Trust.
He claimed control over the whole planet which made him “King of the world”. In celebration, he commissioned a gold-plated headdress in the shape of a pinecone, with an elaborate crown at its base.
The pinecone is an ancient symbol of fertility and one traditionally associated with Ba’al as well as the Cult of Cybele.
It also represents the pineal gland in the centre of our brains –crystalline in nature – which allows us access to Source, hence, the 13-foot tall pinecone in Vatican Square. Think about why the Pontiffs would idolize a pinecone.
The 1st Crown of Crown Land
Pope Boniface VIII was the first leader in history to create the concept of a Trust, but the first Testamentary Trust, through a deed and will creating a Deceased Estate, was created by Pope Nicholas V in 1455, through the Papal Bull Romanus Pontifex.
This is only one of three (3) papal bulls to include the line with the incipit “For a perpetual remembrance.” This Bull had the effect of conveying the right of use of the land as Real Property, from the Express Trust Unam Sanctam to the control of the Pontiff and his successors in perpetuity.
Hence, all land is claimed as “crown land”. This 1st Crown is represented by the 1st Cestui Que Vie Trust, created when a child is born. It deprives us of all beneficial entitlements and rights on the land.
The 2nd Crown of the Commonwealth
The second Crown was created in 1481 with the papal bull Aeterni Regis, meaning “Eternal Crown”, by Sixtus IV, being only the 2nd of three papal bulls as deeds of testamentary trusts.
This Papal Bull created the “Crown of Aragon”, later known as the Crown of Spain, and is the highest sovereign and highest steward of all Roman Slaves subject to the rule of the Roman Pontiff.
Spain lost the crown in 1604 when it was granted to King James I of England by Pope Paul V after the successful passage of the “Union of Crowns”, or Commonwealth, in 1605 after the false flag operation of the Gunpowder Plot.
The Crown was finally lost by England in 1975 when it was returned to Spain and King Carlos I, where it remains to this day.
This 2nd Crown is represented by the 2nd cestui Que Vie Trust, created when a child is born and, by the sale of the birth certificate as a Bond to the private central bank of the nation, depriving us of ownership of our flesh and condemning us to perpetual servitude, as a Roman person, or slave.
The 3rd Crown of the Ecclesiastical See
The third Crown was created in 1537 by Paul III, through the papal bull Convocation, also meant to open the Council of Trent. It is the third and final testamentary deed and will of a testamentary trust, set up for the claiming of all “lost souls”, lost to the See.
The Venetians assisted in the creation of the 1st Cestui Que Vie Act of 1540, to use this papal bull as the basis of Ecclesiastical authority of Henry VIII. This Crown was secretly granted to England in the collection and “reaping” of lost souls.
The Crown was lost in 1816, due to the deliberate bankruptcy of England, and granted to the Temple Bar which became known as the Crown Bar, or simply the Crown.
The Bar Associations have since been responsible for administering the “reaping” of the souls of the lost and damned, including the registration and collection of Baptismal certificates representing the souls collected by the Vatican and stored in its vaults.
This 3rd Crown is represented by the 3rd Cestui Que Vie Trust, created when a child is baptized. It is the parents’ grant of the Baptismal certificate – title to the soul – to the church or Registrar.
Thus, without legal title over one’s own soul, we will be denied legal standing and will be treated as things – cargo without souls – upon which the BAR is now legally able to enforce Maritime law.
The Cestui Que Vie Trust
A Cestui Que Vie Trust is a fictional concept. It is a Temporary Testamentary Trust, first created during the reign of Henry VIII of England through the Cestui Que Vie Act of 1540 and updated by Charles II, through the CQV Act of 1666, wherein an Estate may be effected for the Benefit of a Person presumed lost or abandoned at “sea” and therefore assumed “dead” after seven (7) years.
Additional presumptions, by which such a Trust may be formed, were added in later statutes to include bankrupts, minors, incompetents, mortgages, and private companies.
The original purpose of a CQV Trust was to form a temporary Estate for the benefit of another because some event, state of affairs, or condition prevented them from claiming their status as living, competent, and present, before a competent authority.
Therefore, any claims, history, statutes, or arguments that deviate in terms of the origin and function of a CQV Trust, as pronounced by these canons, is false and automatically null and void.
A Beneficiary under Estate may be either a Beneficiary or a CQV Trust. When a Beneficiary loses direct benefit of any Property of the higher Estate placed in a CQV Trust on his behalf, he do not “own” the CQV Trust; he is only the beneficiary of what the Trustees of the CQV Trust choose to provide.
As all CQV Trusts are created on presumption, based upon original purpose and function, such a Trust cannot be created if these presumptions can be proven not to exist.
Since 1933, when a child is borne in a State (Estate) under inferior Roman law, three (3) Cestui Que (Vie) Trusts are created upon certain presumptions specifically designed to deny, forever, the child any rights of Real Property, any Rights to be free, and any Rights to be known as man or woman, rather than a creature or animal, by claiming and possessing their Soul or Spirit.
The Executors or Administrators of the higher Estate willingly and knowingly:
1. Convey the beneficial entitlements of the child, as Beneficiary, into the 1st Cestui Que (Vie) Trust…
…in the form of a Registry Number by registering the Name, thereby also creating the Corporate Person and denying the child any rights to Real Property; and,
2. Claim the baby as chattel to the Estate
The slave baby contract is then created by honoring the ancient tradition of either having the ink impression of the baby’s feet onto the live birth record, or a drop of its blood, as well as tricking the parents to signing the baby away through the deceitful legal meanings on the live birth record which is a promissory note, converted into a slave bond, sold to the private reserve bank of the estate, and then conveyed into a 2nd and separate CQV Trust, per child, owned by the bank.
When the promissory note reaches maturity and the bank is unable to “seize” the slave child, a maritime lien is lawfully issued to “salvage” the lost property and is monetized as currency issued in series against the CQV Trust.
3. Claim the child’s soul via the Baptismal Certificate
Since 1540 and the creation of the 1st CQV Act, deriving its power from the Papal Bull of Roman Cult leader Pope Paul III, 1540, when a child is baptized and a Baptismal Certificate is issued, the parents have gifted, granted, and conveyed the soul of the baby to a “3rd” CQV Trust owned by Roman Cult, which has held this valuable property in its vaults ever since.
Since 1815, this 3rd Crown of the Roman Cult and 3rd CQV Trust representing Ecclesiastical Property has been managed by the BAR as the reconstituted “Galla” responsible, as Grim Reapers, for reaping the souls.
Each Cestui Que Vie Trust, created since 1933, represents one of the 3 Crowns representing the three claims of property of the Roman Cult: Real Property (on Earth), Personal Property (body), and Ecclesiastical Property (soul).
Each corresponds exactly to the three forms of law available to the Galla of the BAR Courts: corporate commercial law (judge is the ‘landlord’), maritime and canon law (judge is the banker), and Talmudic law (judge is the priest).
What is the real power of a court ‘judge’?
Given what has been revealed about the foundations of Roman Law, what is the real hidden power of a judge when we face court? Is it their superior knowledge of process and procedure or of magic? Or is it something simpler and far more obvious?
It is unfortunate that much of the excitement about Estates and Executors has deliberately not revealed that an Estate, by definition, has to belong to a Trust – to be specific, a Testamentary Trust or CQV Trust.
When we receive legal paper or have to appear in court, it is these same CQV Trusts which have our rights converted into the property contained within them.
Instead of being the Trustee, or the Executor, or Administrator, we are merely the Beneficiary of each CQV Trust, granted only beneficial and equitable use of certain property, never legal title.
So if the Roman Legal System assumes we are merely the beneficiary of these CQV Trusts, when we go to court, who represents the Trustee and Office of Executor?
We all know that all cases are based upon the judge’s discretion which often defies procedures, statutes, and maxims of law.
Well, they are doing what any Trustee or Executor, administering a trust in the presence of the beneficiary, can do under Roman Law and all the statutes, maxims, and procedures are really for show because under the principles of Trust Law, as first formed by the Roman Cult, a Trustee has a wide latitude, including the ability to correct any procedural mistakes, by obtaining the implied or tacit consent of the beneficiary, to obviate any mistakes.
The judge is the real and legal Name. The judge is the trust, itself. We are the mirror image to them – the ghost – the dead.
It is high sorcery, trickery, and subterfuge that has remained “legal” for far too long.
Origin of Settlement (Birth) Certificates:
Under King Henry VIII of England and his Venetian/Magyar advisers, the first poor laws were promulgated around 1535 coinciding with the first official mandate requiring uniform record keeping by all Church of England parishes of births, deaths, and marriages.
The poor were considered the responsibility of the “Church” including ensuring they had ample work and did not starve to death as they were considered by default the property of the church.
Under Queen Elizabeth I of England, a set of measures which were introduced which had the effect of accelerating the disenfranchisement of land peasants into landless paupers.
Under the Erection of Cottages Act 1588, peasants required local parish permission to erect dwellings whereas before the erection of a dwelling by a land peasant on their lord’s land was considered a “right”. As a result, the ranks of the landless poor, or “paupers” swelled.
Under Queen Elizabeth I of England, the laws concerning the administration and care of the “poor” were refined through the Poor Law (1601) which introduced a basic set of “rights” for the poor as well as the introduction of two “Overseers of the Poor” (Guardian) in each Parish, elected at Easter and funded through the first levy (tax) through local rates (now called “council taxes”) on property-owning ratepayers.
Under Charles II of England, the concept of “Settlements” as plantations of working poor controlled by the Church of England was further refined through the Settlement Act (1662) and Poor Relief Act (1662) including for the first time the issuance of “Settlement Certificates” equivalent to a “birth certificate, passport and social security” rolled into one document.
A child’s birthplace was its place of settlement unless its mother had a settlement certificate from some other parish stating that the unborn child was included on the certificate.
However from the age of 7 upwards the child could have been apprenticed and gained a settlement for itself through called indentured service, or “voluntary slavery”. Also, the child could have obtained a settlement for itself by service by the time it was 16.
Under the “reforms” of the Settlement Act (1662) and Poor Relief Act (1662), no one was allowed to move from town to town without the appropriate “Settlement Certificate”.
If a person entered a parish in which he or she did not have official settlement, and seemed likely to become chargeable to the new parish, then an examination would be made by the justices (or parish overseers).
From this examination on oath, the justices would determine if that person had the means to sustain himself. The results of the examination were documented in an Examination Paper.
As a result of the examination, the intruder would then either be allowed to stay or would be removed by means of what was known as a Removal Order, the origin of the modern equivalent of an “Eviction and Removal Notice” when a sheriff removes people from their home.
According to the various settlement acts from the 17th Century onwards until the introduction of Birth Certificates, the issue of a Settlement Certificate was considered a privilege, not a right.
If a peasant wanted to move, the home parish could choose to issue a Settlement Certificate which then effectively became an indemnity insurance to the new parish if the pauper was unable to earn a living.
A settlement certificate was only valid if it bore the seals of the overseers of both parishes and that of the local Justices and was not transferable. This is the same model of modern passports for citizens listed as “P” (Paupers or Peons) used today.
Due to the increase in the number of “poor”, in 1723 a new law was passed called the Workhouse Test Act (1723) in which those who wished to claim benefits and relief as poor now had to enter a “workhouse” being essentially a prison for men, women and children to perform some set work.
To ensure that all poor were accounted and could be identified, new laws were also introduced to force the Paupers to wear a ‘P’ on their right shoulders as a mark of their status.
This is both the origin of the “P” still placed as a mark on modern passports and other “official” documents and the “P” worn by prisoners from the 20th Century.
Beginning in 1773 with the Inclosure Act 1773, followed by the Inclosure Consolidation Act 1801, English Parliament effectively “privatized” massive amounts of common land for the benefit of a few, causing huge numbers of land peasants to become “landless paupers” and therefore in need of parish assistance. The Inclosure Acts are the foundation of Land Title as it is known today.
Because of the deliberate “legal” theft of land under parliamentary Inclosure laws of the late 18th and early 19th Century, the number of paupers dramatically increased.
This led to the most awful and cruel laws being introduced to deliver to an elite few, the slave labor force needed for the industrial revolution through the Poor Law Amendment Act (1834) which effectively stated that the poor could not receive any benefit unless they were constantly “employed” in a workhouse prison.
Thus, despite international treaties against slavery, the very worst slavery being “wage slavery” or “lawful slavery” was born whereby men, women, and children lived in terrible conditions and were worked “to death”.
Beginning in 1834, a number of historic changes were introduced to the record keeping of births, deaths, and marriages, the issuance of documents and the management of the “poor”:
(i) In 1834, British Parliament introduced the Poor Law Amendment Act (1834) which reorganized Church of England parishes into unions which would then be responsible for the poor in their area and administered by a Board of Poor Law Guardians, also known as the Board of Guardians. The clerks of Magistrates Courts still hold the power of a Clerk of the Board of Guardians; and
(ii) In 1835, the Municipal Corporations Act (1835) was introduced which effectively standardized the corporate model for towns and boroughs including making the municipality with elected officials responsible for data collection and service administration; and
(iii) In 1836, the Births and Deaths Registration Act (1836) was introduced which for the first time created the General Register Office and the requirement for uniform records of births, deaths and marriages across the Empire by Municipal Councils and Unions of Parishes. Thus on 1 July 1837, the Birth Certificate was formed as the successor of the Settlement Certificate for all “paupers” disenfranchised of their land birthright to be considered lawful (“voluntary”) slaves with benefits provided by the local parish/region underwritten by the Society of Lloyds as it is still today.
Beginning from 1871, further historic changes in the administration of “vital statistics” such as birth certificates and death certificates with the introduction of health districts or “sanitary districts”.
The Local Government Act of 1871, Public Health Act 1872 and Public Health Act 1875 created a system of “districts” called Sanitary Districts governed by a Sanitary Authority responsible for various public health matters including mental health legally known as “sanity”. Two types of Sanitary Districts were created being Urban and Rural.
While the sanitary districts were “abolished” in 1894 with the Local Government Act of 1894, the administration of the “poor” is still maintained in part under the concept of district health boards of Guardians including magistrates and other “Justices of the Peace”.
Since 1990 under the United Nations and the World Health Organisation (WHO) by the Convention on the Rights of the Child, the system of issuing birth certificates as proof of a man or woman being a permanent member of the underclass has become an international system.
Birth Certificate as proof one is born on the land:
One fundamental flaw that remains within the Settlement (Birth) Certificate System for the Roman Cult and its agents remains the fact that a Settlement Certificate is proof that a man or woman must have been born on the land for the certificate to have effect, regardless of convoluted subsequent presumptions of what the certificate actually represents.
If a man or woman was not born on the land somewhere a certificate could not be issued. Therefore any rejection or return of a Birth Certificate serves as perfected evidence that a man or woman was born on the land and support to any Affidavit of Truth concerning their immutable rights from the Divine Creator.
This built-in “flaw” is offset through the treatment of men and women as land themselves, through the deliberate corruption of the definition of land to include all that has been born naturally or self-improved on the land.
In other words, the sharp edge reason the system ultimately denies each citizen their share of the commonwealth is because they are considered “chattel” and mere creatures less than slaves.
Birth Certificates are not “extremely valuable” to the holder in whose name the certificate is issued
While it is true that Birth Certificates are considered valuable securities that are traded amongst the private international entities and the elite, the holder in whose name the certificate is issued does not have access to such value.
Instead, by holding the Birth Certificate, the man or woman essentially consent to being treated as a pauper or peon and the sole obligation of the elite to provide mere scraps so that the man or woman does not die of starvation or great illness.
As Settlement Certificates and later Birth Certificates are solely and purposefully designed to disenfranchise men and woman from their rightful inheritance through voluntary enslavement and admission to being “paupers”, the system of Birth Certificates is wholly without legitimacy, a global system of organized fraud and crime and without lawful effect.
- These 13 Families Rule the World: The Shadow Forces Behind the NWO
- The Top of the Pyramid: The Rothschilds, the British Crown and the Vatican Rule the World
- How the Birth Certificate is Used to Take Away Your Natural Rights
- You Don’t Own Yourself — The Federal Reserve Does
- How You Were Tricked to Live in the Land of the Legally Dead
The Convention on the Rights of the Child was adopted by the General Assembly of the United Nations by its resolution 44/25 of 20 November 1989. This was the end of a process which had begun with the preparations for the 1979 International Year of the Child.
Since 1990 under the United Nations and the World Health Organisation (WHO) by the Convention on the Rights of the Child, the system of issuing birth certificates as proof of a man or woman being a permanent member of the underclass has become an international system.
Reference: A World of Slavery, by Frank M. Webb
This Is Your Wakeup Call!
TO WATCH THIS VIDEO ON BITCHUTE: CLICK HERE
Update added 3/19/20
In Profile : Who Owns Your Soul? Welcome To Cestui Que Vic Trusts
How the Gospels became the monster, the shadow side of Rome
The Three Crowns
AD 325 – Constantine in the spurious written donation to Pope Sylvester, today proven to be an invention, is basically presenting a case that St Peter as the Apostle of Jesus, and the one to whom Jesus gave the earthly kingdom, is reason enough for Rome to continue to Claim taxes for Christ. Hence was born the Corporation of the Apostle Peter.
AD 1302 – Pope Boniface VIII, created the first Express Trust, called Unum Sanctum.
The Trust was set up to allow then lords and knights to go off to fight in the crusades. What they did was to hand over in Trust, the care of their estates and property to a trusted friend.
The new owner became the Trustee of the holding on behalf of the knight or lord , etc.
Upon return from Crusade many knights found that their trusted Trustee refused to hand the titles back, and then found the courts would back the new Trustee’s claim over that of the knights.
The Holy See controls the courts through the Canon Law.
From this Trust would a further three Trusts take they’re divine authority, the authority to make you an asset of the divine corporation.
If we expand the picture somewhat what we have in the creation of the Unum Sanctum is the mechanic by which the Holy See, through the Pope, was the whisperer of deeds to be done for Christ in the ears of Kings and to Knights to go off and kill in direct opposition to the Gospel message, thus the knight in following the call to kill given by the Pope, forfeits his land and titles to his Trustee. If the knight showed continued allegiance to the Pope during the campaigns, upon his return from the crusade would receive his property and land back from his appointed Trustee, but in order to keep his regained possessions he becomes a slave to the Holy See or the courts would shift ruling in the favour of the Trustee.
The Claim of Right that made up the Papal Bull had within it the claim that they own all the souls in all the world.
In this manner the Vatican did take control over land and rights and also tittles across Europe. In this sense the rift between the Knights Templar and the Holy See was created as the Knights realised the trap and began to operate against the Holy See, and thus became a legitimate challenge to those families that made the Claim of Right over the entire world. This challenge was met by :
AD 1307 – Pope Clement, successor to Boniface, worked with Philip the Fair to destroy the Cabalistic Templars and thus the challenge to the Claim of Right made by the Holy See.
The Claim of Right and the first Express Trust named Unum Sanctum, is the core of the Holy Sees ownership of your soul. The Birth Certificate is the Title to your soul and proof of ownership by the Holy See. This Trust is the first Crown.
In the first Claim of Right the Holy See had become the owner of your soul.
Having reduced powerful people into slaves to the Vatican through rulings of court the second Claim of Right was formed to give the Holy See ownership of your property.
AD 1455 – a Testamentary Trust is created under Pope Nicolas V, called Romanus Pontifix. This Trust had conveyed into it all the rights of the first Claim of Right the Holy See made upon your soul.
This Trust is the foundation to Monarchy, it is the Crown Trust to which all monarchs have Title, they do not have ownership, that resides with the first Claim of Right by the Holy See over your soul. Monarchs are administrators. This is the first Crown. This Crown removes your real estate rights.
AD 1481 – a third Claim of Right and second Trust is created under Pope Sixtus IV, called Aeterni Regis, Regis of course meaning Crown and Aeterni meaning eternal, the Eternal Crown this is the Third Crown making up the Unholy Trinity. This Crown removes your personal property rights
In the Incipit of this Bull, the Testament of the Holy See it says :
“For a perpetual remembrance.”
This is the second testamentary deed, Trust and will the second crown of the people which makes people slaves, this is the Trust over the Commonwealth, so not an English ideology at all. The current British structure is exactly a Holy See Trust.
AD 1531 – a third Trust was created called Convocation and relates to Baptism and thus your soul. This relates directly to the Commonwealth or as making up the common-wealth owned by the Holy See from the ownership of the souls of the masses. The idea of Commonwealth is far from an English creation, it is a creation of the Roman Empire.
The latter three Trusts make up the three Crowns depicted in the above image.
King Henry VIII in breaking with Rome created his own raft of Cestui Que Vic Trusts cemented in 1666 under Charles II. With the installing of Saxa Coburg and Gotha on the throne of Britain Rome began the road to retake power leading to the illegitimate Monarch that is Queen Elizabeth II, who has undone everything achieved by Elizabeth I, the daughter of Henry VIII. (The Tudors were backed by the House Stanley and House Pallavacini)
Vatican II finalised the Jesuit and thus the secret society combine takeover of the entire Vatican system allowing futurism to become the real script religion would follow. This includes Zionism and Islam.
The original idea of Monarchs tied to the Christian Canon Law was not originally a bad thing, but from 909 AD the Carolingians became the Monastery at Cluny. The West is controlled via this system therefore whomever controls Rome the Church, controls all in Christendom.
Example of the split title in action
 This is the section entitled “An Astounding Document” in Chapter 2, “The Quest for Absolute Power,” in Peter de Rosa’s Vicars of Christ: The Dark Side of the Papacy (Bantam Press, Corgi edition, 1999, pp. 63-61.) It tells the story of one of the greatest hoaxes ever committed, a monumental fraud whose effects have endured for over 1500 years to the present day.
Stephen III became pontiff in the year 752 after his predecessor Stephen II had lasted only four days, the shortest reign recorded. The new pontiff had been practically brought up in the papal court. He knew the pope was not merely a religious leader but, as a loyal vassal of the emperor, a civil governor, too, with extensive territories under his command.
The secularisation of the church, started by Constantine, was well under way. He had seen the potential of the hierarchy as a governing class. They were as well organised as his own civil service, which they slowly replaced in the courts and in diplomacy. When, in the year 330, the emperor took his entourage to Constantinople, on the site of the ancient Greek City of Byzantium, the bishops of Rome became more and more involved in civil affairs. Two popes in particular are numbered among the greatest men who ever lived. Leo the Great (440-61), by an act of great daring, saved Rome from Attila the Hun. Gregory the Great (590-604) was effectively the civil leader as well as Patriarch of the West. With this dual role thrust upon them, there was an inevitable growth in bureaucracy. They worked heroically, but Christian simplicity was never again to be seen in Christian Rome.
When the Lombards, a barbarian tribe from the Baltic, settled in Italy after the year 568, the papacy had no peace. The newcomers took over most of the North. Gradually converted, the Lombards were never trusted by the Holy See. When the bond between popes and their liege lords, the emperors, weakened, the pontiffs had to forge a fresh military alliance if they were to hold on to Rome and the surrounding territories. It would perhaps have been better had they surrendered them, but to great landowners that has always been unthinkable.
One year into his pontificate, Stephen III travelled north in winter to see Pepin, king of the Franks. Never before had a pope sought aid from a Western sovereign; it was to be the first of many requests for military aid. In robes of black, his hair covered in ashes, the pope knelt at the king’s feet, imploring him to use his armies to save the affairs of St Peter and St Paul and the community of Rome. There, at the Abbey of St Denis, he anointed Pepin and his son, Charlemagne, as ‘patricians of the Romans’.
It was most likely at this meeting that Stephen showed his royal host a document of great antiquity. Dusty and crumbling, it had been preserved for centuries in the papal archives. Dated 30 March 315, it was called ‘The Donation of Constantine’. It was a deed or gift from the first Christian emperor to Pope Sylvester.
The Donation tells the moving story of how Constantine contracted leprosy all over his body. Pagan priests erected a font on the Capitol and tried to persuade him to fill it with the blood of little children. While the blood was warm, Constantine should bathe in it and be healed. Many children were herded together with they’re weeping mothers. The emperor, touched by their tears, sent them home loaded with gifts. That night, he had a dream. Peter and Paul told him to contact Pope Sylvester, then in hiding on Mount Soracte. The pope would show him the true ‘pool of piety’. Once he recovered his health, he was to restore Christian churches throughout the world, give up praying to idols and worship the true God. Constantine did as he was told. ‘When I was at the bottom of the [baptismal] font,’ he said, ‘I saw a hand from heaven touching me.’ He came from his baptism healed. Sylvester preached to him the Trinity and repeated Jesus’ words to Peter: ‘Thou art Peter … and I will give to thee the Keys of the Kingdom.’ Convinced he had been healed by the power of the Apostle, Constantine, in the name of the Senate and the entire Roman people, gave a gift to the Vicar of God’s Son and to all his successors:
Inasmuch as our imperial power is earthly, we have decreed that it shall venerate and honour his [Peter’s] most holy Roman Church and that the sacred See of Blessed Peter shall be gloriously exalted even above our Empire and earthly throne. … He shall rule over the four principal Sees, Antioch, Alexandria, Constantinople and Jerusalem, as over all churches of God in all the world. …
Finally, lo, we convey to Sylvester, universal Pope, both our palace and likewise all provinces and palaces and districts of the city of Rome and Italy and of the regions of the West.
Constantine also gave a hitherto unheard of explanation as to why he had taken himself to the East. He wished that Rome, where the Christian religion was founded by the Emperor of Heaven (Christ), should have no rival on earth. Pagan Rome had abdicated in favour of Christian Rome.
King Pepin was impressed. The document proved that the pope was successor to Peter and Constantine. The emperor had even acted as Sylvester’s groom, inspiring many emperors and kings to imitate his humility at papal coronations in the centuries that followed.
When Pepin took to the field and routed the Lombards he handed back to the pope all the lands that were rightly his by the Donation.
It was a surprising development of the gospels. Jesus possessed nothing but the clothes he stood up in. His chief disciples now not only had enormous territories to which they became excessively attached; they needed military alliances to keep them.
The Donation continued to be influential. For example, the only English pope, Adrian IV, appealed to it when gave Ireland to Henry II of England. Adrian was formerly Nicholas Breakspear, the son of a priest.
When Henry began the long and tragic occupation of Ireland in 1171, the Irish episcopate, assembled at Cashel, recognised him and his successors as lawful kings of Ireland. To this, the new pope, Alexander III, set his seal of approval, but not before insisting that he received his annual penny per household [subsequently known as “Peter’s pence”]. This was the papacy’s price for handing over this most Catholic and Celtic of lands to the Norman English.
What makes it harder to bear is that the Donation was a forgery.
The Donation was a fabrication, probably concocted by a Lateran priest just before Stephen III visited King Pepin. Such was the state of scholarship at that time, no one saw through it, though a schoolboy could do so today. It was not until a papal aide, Lorenzo Valla, took it apart line by line in 1440 that it was proved to be a fraud.
Valla showed that the pope at the alleged time of the Donation was not Sylvester but Miltiades. The text refers to ‘Constantinople’ whereas Constantine’s City in the East still retained its original name of Byzantium. The Donation was written not in classical Latin but in a later bastardised form. Also, explanations are given, say, of Constantine’s regalia, which would not have been needed in the fourth century but were necessary in the eighth. In a hundred irrefutable ways, Valla shot the document to pieces. He did so with trepidation, knowing that many Roman prelates would be out for his blood.
Because I have attacked not the dead but the living, not merely any ruler but the highest ruler, namely, the Supreme Pontiff against whose excommunication the sword of no prince can afford protection. … The Pope has no right to bind me for defending the truth. … When there are many who will endure death for the defence of an earthly fatherland, should I not incur danger for the sake of my heavenly home?
It was not until 1517 that Valla’s book was published. It was the critical year when Luther attacked indulgences. A copy of it came into Luther’s hands, and he saw for the first time that many of his earlier beliefs about the papacy were founded on forgeries like the Donation.
Though every independent scholar was won over by Valla’s arguments, Rome did not concede; she went on asserting the Donation’s authenticity for centuries.
This was a pity in that the truth about it was far more incredible than the tissue of lies it contained.
The story of Constantine’s leprosy and subsequent baptismal cure was a pious fifth-century invention. The fable is perpetuated in the baptistry of St John Lateran in Rome. An inscription relates how the emperor was baptised there by Pope Sylvester.
These are the facts: Constantine was a soldier at a time when shedding blood was unacceptable to the church. This may be why he delayed his baptism until he was on the point of death and he had no strength left to commit sin or kill anyone else. Not long before, his mother Helena had died, aged over eighty. Only then was the emperor enrolled among the catechumens [persons receiving instruction in the principles of the Christian religion with a view to baptism], not in the church’s headquarters but in distant Helenopolis, in the East. He was taken to the Villa Achyronia near Nicomedia. He was baptised there not by the pope, not even by a Catholic bishop or priest, but by a heretical Arian bishop named Eusebius. He died on the last day of the Whitsun holiday in the year 337.
This throws a murky light on many of the most significant events in the church’s early history.
When Constantine called bishops his beloved brethren and styled himself ‘Bishop of Rome,’ which popes later appropriated, he was not a Christian, not even a catechumen. Yet no one remotely approached his stature and authority. Even the Bishop of Rome — not to be called ‘the pope’ for many centuries — was, in comparison, a nonentity. In civic terms, he was a vassal of the emperor; in spiritual terms, he was, compared with Constantine, a second-class bishop, with a title of honour over most other bishops because he held the Apostolic See where Peter and Paul and worked and lay buried. As Burckhardt stresses in The Age of Constantine, the emperor’s title of ecumenical bishop ‘was not merely a manner of speaking; actually the Church had no other central point’. Not the pope but he, like Charlemagne later, was the head of the church, its source of unity, before whom the Bishop of Rome had to prostrate himself and pledge his loyalty. All bishops agreed that he was ‘the inspired oracle, the apostle of Church wisdom’.
To the end of his life, Constantine, while building magnificent churches in Palestine and elsewhere, was erecting equally magnificent pagan temples in Constantinople. This was clearly understood as part of the first settlement of ‘the Roman Question’. The emperor was a sacred person, Pontifex Maximus, another title that the pope was later to assume. It followed that the emperor, and he alone, had authority to convoke religious assemblies like the Council of Arles in the year 314. As one contemporary bishop put it: ‘The Church was part of the State. The Church was born into the Empire, not the Empire into the Church.’ It was, therefore, Constantine, not the Bishop of Rome, who dictated the time and place of church synods and even how the votes were cast. Without his approval, they could not pass into law; he alone was legislator of the Empire.
It is another paradox of history that it was Constantine, a pagan, who invented the idea of a council of all Christian communities. Only in this way, his genius told him, would the church’s faith be formulated incontestably and for ever. No bishop of the time would have asked the Bishop of Rome to decide thorny questions of belief.
After defeating Licinius in the East in 321, Constantine called the First General Council of the Church. It met in 325 in Bithynia, in a place called Nicaea, meaning ‘Victory’. It was probably the most important Christian assembly in history. Arianism, a heresy that subordinated the Son to the Father, had spread all over the world. Controversy was not merely bitter, it was bloody. It was against the emperor’s interests to have Christians fighting one another; they were meant to be the stabilising force of Empire. He was dismayed to find that, after he had freed them from persecution, they were tearing each other to bits over the Holy Trinity.
At Nicaea, the Founding Father of Ecumenical Councils gathered 300 bishops, having laid on free transport. All but half a dozen were from the East. Sylvester, Bishop of Rome, did not attend; he sent two presbyters instead. Without a shred of doubt, Sylvester had no part in calling the Council or any say in running it. A pagan emperor had complete control. He held it in the big hall of his palace. According to the historian Eusebius, he was tall and slender, full of grace and majesty. To make his presence felt, he opened proceedings ‘stiff with purple, gold and precious stones’.
It was soon clear that a majority of bishops were in favour of the Arian position. Constantine had no known theological preferences but he rose from his gold throne to end the discussion. Maybe he simply wanted to show he was in charge. He proposed what came to be call ‘the orthodox view’ of God’s Son being ‘of one substance’ with the Father. All dissident bishops caved in, except for two whom Constantine promptly deposed and sent packing. Afterwards, he wrote to Alexandria where Arians still had a foothold: ‘What has pleased three hundred bishops is nothing other than the will of God.’
The outcome was not what he had hoped. The Arian ‘heresy’ went on for generations. So did the complete immersion of the state in church affairs. Ecclesiastical politics replaced the priorities of the Gospel. Religion was unimportant, the church was all-important. The result, Burckhardt said, was a ‘Church rapidly disintegrating in victory’.
The cost of Constantine’s ‘conversion’ to Christianity was the loss of innocence. His cynical use of Christ, in which everyone, including the Bishop of Rome, acquiesced, meant a profound falsification of the Gospel message and the injection of standards alien to it. From then on, Catholicism flourished to the detriment of Christianity and of Jesus who wanted no part in the world of power and politics, who preferred to be crucified rather than to impose his views on anyone.
By the time Stephen III became pope, the church was thoroughly converted to the Roman Empire. From the Donation, it is plain that the Bishop of Rome looked like Constantine, lived like him, dressed like him, inhabited his palaces, ruled over his lands, had exactly the same imperial outlook. The pope, too, wanted to lord it over church and state.
Only seven hundred years after Peter died, popes had become obsessed with power and possessions. The pontiff strode the earth, a figure of worldliness and unworldliness. He, literally, wanted the best of both worlds, but certain Roman emperors kept a check on his ambition.
 Birth certificates were first demanded in Britain in 1836 after the House of Rothschild removed the British stock market from the British government in June 1815 after the Battle of Waterloo.
In the United States after the 1913 formation of the Federal Reserve the same move would be put into place with the same demand for the registration of your children set in statute in 1933 under Franklin Roosevelt and his new deal.
Colonel Mandel House an agent of the House of Rothschild had this to say :
Soon every American will be required to register their biological property in a national system designed to keep track of the people. We can compel people to submit to our agenda which will affect our security as a chargeback for our fiat paper currency. Every American will be forced to register or suffer not being able to work and earn a living. They will be our chattel. They will be stripped of their rights and given a commercial value.
Titles we take for granted such as Mr, Mrs, Dr, MP, QC, MD, HM, etc are the presentation of the commercial value of the Legal Fiction.
In the realm of the legal fiction all common law rights are turned into crimes, such as defending yourself and your goods and shackles and your right to the highways for example.
Dante and the Donation of Constantine, (Quattro Coronati, Rome)
The Legal Person, What is its Nature?
In Profile : The battle for the soul of England, Elizabeth I to Elizabeth II
In Profile :The Society of Jesus
Please Click to Continue: Part 6 of 6