HUMAN HYBRIDS – HOW TRAGIC!
By Cynthia Pawl 7/10/16
OH MY GOODNESS!! Do you have a heart??? The first time I looked at these pictures, I cried. How horrifying. Who could be so ruthless as to create these poor beings? You have to wonder what is going on inside of them. IF they have human aspects, then it is highly likely that they can recognize their tragic state. How heartbreaking. How would you feel, in their situation? Are these redeemable spirits? Will we be living with them in the afterlife? How does GOD feel, when He looks down on them? It has to break his heart.
If you are a truth seeker or a person who likes to research you surely have learned that the elite, who run the world, never allow us to know what is really going on. What they reveal to us has usually been in existence and under development, for 50 years or more, before they ever reveal it to us. My point is, that we have no idea how long scientists/occultists around the world have been creating hybrids/chimeras and injecting them into society. Our blood has most likely already been affected to some extent. Certainly, all of our food supply has been corrupted. And we are what we eat.
Satan, who deceives the whole world.) even You. REAL LIFE Mad Scientists Are CreatingMONSTERS. Go to article. Posted on March 29, 2019 5:49 pm.
This has all been going on for much longer than we will ever know. Take a look at some of these excerpts.
Mice Used as Sperm Factories for Pigs, Goats – Hillary Mayell, for National Geographic News August 14, 2002″For the first time scientists have been able to produce viable sperm from the tissue of sexually immature mammals—and at the same time produce sperm of one species in the body of another species.
“Now we know how to do this, but we don’t know all the ramifications and consequences of doing it,”
Scientists hate to talk about something they haven’t done” (There you go… so if you are hearing them talk about it, you can believe they have perfected it, after many years of experimentation.)
Scientific Pitfalls Complicate Cloning Debate – Ben Harder, For National Geographic News May 31, 2002
“Cloning is as much an art as it is a science,” said Robert Lanza of Advanced Cell Technology in Worcester, Massachusetts.
After years of experiments …cloning hit the big time in February 1997. That month, scientists reported the first successful attempt to reproduce a large, adult mammal through cloning. Nicknamed Dolly. Since Dolly, cows, pigs, monkeys, an adorable kitten, and even rare and endangered animals have all been produced through cloning
Not everyone realizes that Dolly was the final success story at the end of a string of unsuccessful attempts and spontaneous abortions. Scores of sheep embryos died. (So you heard them say scores of embryos died, I wonder how many lived. And not just animals.)
“Research teams that have practiced the technique numerous times can get a good success rate, Lanza said. (Practiced it numerous times, and a good success rate means a pretty good number of successes.)
Several secretive groups of scientists claim to be close to cloning a live human baby, but they have released little information to the public, and their claims have not been verified. (So, we have several/multiple groups of SECRETIVE Scientists who do not release their information to the public.)
If animal cloning experiments are any guide, attempts to clone people may face a high rate of failure. Often many nuclei must be transferred from cell to egg for each one that succeeds in developing into an embryo. This so-called wastage is much higher in cloning than in other reproductive technologies, such as in vitro fertilization, said Don Wolf, a researcher working to clone rhesus monkeys at the Oregon Regional Primate Research Center.
“There’s no reason to think biologically that humans would be any [more difficult] than other animals we’ve cloned,” Lanza said. “But each species requires going up a learning curve.” Producing Dolly, he noted, required scores of unsuccessful attempts.
When it comes to making copies of organisms, humans aren’t experimental subjects on which most scientists are willing to try unreliable procedures. So regardless of how the ongoing ethical debate unfolds, science may hold off on trying to replicate people until it’s entirely clear how the process of cloning works—and why it sometimes doesn’t. (So we can assume that they have perfected the process in animals, since they are cloning humans. That makes me wonder, how many cloned animals do we have running around?)
To put it in the terms a certain wise old organism might have used: “Do, or do not. There is no try.” But then again, Yoda was one of a kind. (OK, so this “scientist sees YODA as a “WISE OLD” organism. And he is displaying the thinking of the scientific community… DO IT, or DO NOT TRY)
An in-depth look at cloning and the controversy that surrounds it.
1) resurrect extinct species,
2) grow replacement organs,
3) duplicate ourselves.
The video Premiered:
You should realize now, that if they are talking about it (which that 2002 video is doing) then they are already doing it. LIke the man said, “Scientists hate to talk about something they have not done”. Listen to what people are witnessing… they are already resurrecting extinct species, they are already cloning people and they are already growing replacement organs!! WAKE UP PEOPLE!!
Animal-Human Hybrids Spark Controversy
|Exerpts from: Scientific Pitfalls Complicate Cloning Debate
Maryann Mott National Geographic News January 25, 2005
Scientists have begun blurring the line between human and animal by producing chimeras—
a hybrid creature that’s part human, part animal.
Chinese scientists at the Shanghai Second Medical University in 2003 successfully fused human cells with rabbit eggs. The embryos were reportedly the first human-animal chimeras successfully created.
In Minnesota last year researchers at the Mayo Clinic created pigs with human blood flowing through their bodies.
Scientist Irving Weisman and Stanford University have been conducting experiments that place human brain cells in mice since 2005 (at least). Stanford University in California conducted an experiment to create mice with brains that are about one percent human. The planned to conduct another experiment where the mice would have 100 percent human brains. This would be done, they said, by injecting human neurons into the brains of embryonic mice.
Half the Cells
in This Mouse’s Brain
|Researchers implanted immature human brain cells in mouse pups, which then grew and replaced nearly half the mice’s own cells There are mice running around in labs that are smarter than their peers. This distinction goes beyond an above-average aptitude for mouse-intelligence tests: These mice are smarter because half the cells in their brain are actually human cells.
A new study, published in The Journal of Neuroscience, explores the consequences of creating mice that have mousy neurons but human glial cells—cells that support nerve cells and strengthen connections between them. Steve Goldman, a researcher at the University of Rochester Medical Center in New York, led a research team that took immature glial cells from human fetuses (donated to research) and injected them into the brains of mouse pups, reports Andy Coghlan for New Scientist. Since the glial cells were immature, they continued to grow and divide in the mouse brain, crowding out the mouse cells.
That difference gives the mice with these human-mouse chimera brains an advantage. “It’s like ramping up the power of your computer,” Goldman says.
There are also plans to create rats with human brain cells. Excerpts from SMARTNEWS -Keeping you current
(If you have never seen the feature length cartoon called “The Secret of NIMH”, you should. It came out in 1982, and it is all about scientists experimenting on mice and rats. It is very interesting. Eye opening in fact.) You can watch it here:https://youtu.be/WLE65PZ30tM
|Jamais Cascio, a writer and futurist wrote, “[We’re] making these non-human animals demonstrably smarter. We are, in a very limited fashion, uplifting them (to use David Brin’s terminology). They will be able to understand the world a bit (or even a lot) better than others of their kind. And at some point, we may well even end up with test subjects significantly smarter than typical and able to demonstrate behaviors unsettlingly close to our own.
What rights should any of these types of uplifted animals have? Do we need to spell out a greater set of rights for the human chimera mice in the news report? Or as we create increasingly more-intelligent-than-typical animals, will there a point at which they could no longer be limited to the rights given to all scientific research animals? At what point would it become a crime to kill them, no matter how humanely or in accordance with ethical standards?” Source: here
Excerpts from: Animal-Human Hybrids Spark Controversy
A chimera is a mixture of two or more species in one body. Not all are considered troubling, though.
For example, faulty human heart valves are routinely replaced with ones taken from cows and pigs. The surgery—which makes the recipient a human-animal chimera—is widely accepted.
And for years scientists have added human genes to bacteria and farm animals.
Biotechnology activist Jeremy Rifkin: “One doesn’t have to be religious or into animal rights to think this doesn’t make sense,” he continued. “It’s the scientists who want to do this. They’ve now gone over the edge into the pathological domain.”
William Cheshire, associate professor of neurology at the Mayo Clinic’s Jacksonville, Florida: “This is unexplored biologic territory,” he said. “Whatever moral threshold of human neural development we might choose to set as the limit for such an experiment, there would be a considerable risk of exceeding that limit before it could even be recognized.”
Cheshire supports research that combines human and animal cells to study cellular function. As an undergraduate he participated in research that fused human and mouse cells.
|Why China is a Genetic Power House with a Problem
CAROLYN ABRAHAM AND CAROLYNNE WHEELER
“But along with the envy, there is discomfort and, in the United States, outright fear that an enterprise backed in part with bank loans supported by the Chinese government has unfettered access to the genetic building blocks of humanity. DNA, after all, contains the chemical hallmarks of what makes each of us unique – the raw material that may hold the keys to the next breakthroughs in science and medicine.”
(DID you catch that? The US Scientific community is in “OUTRIGHT FEAR” that the Chinese will be the first to break new ground in Genetic Engineering. Do you understand yet that “Science” is a highly competitive industry? I heard one scientist state that “unfortunately in science it only counts if you get there first”. Scientific labs and organizations are constantly trying to “beat the other guys to it”. It being the latest, greatest breakthrough. This is all done at ANY COST!! Even outright FRAUD. They have no regard for human life, or for the environment, or for the survival of mankind. THE ARE DRIVEN to push the envelope and test the boundaries. REGARDLESS!!)
|2014 Aug Breaking News Mixing Human DNA with Animal DNA
Last days final hour news prophecyEXCLUSIVE TOP KEPT SECRET!!! Human Animal Hybrids
Exist Today CODE ANTICHRIST SOUL-less HUMAN-ANIMAL HYBRIDS being GROWN in USA Research Farms! End Times: Human and Animal Hybrids Come To Life…
MacDonald Glenn put it to me this way: “Just how many genes does one need to be considered human? Considering 97% percent of our genome consists of the genes we share with other species — chimps, fruit flies, even common brewer’s yeast — do these questions even matter?”
To which she added, “Further advances in the blending of nonhuman animal and human DNA could result — intentionally or not — in chimeric entities possessing degrees of intelligence or sentience never before seen in nonhuman animals. Would an intelligent, sentient creation be property or a person? Could he/she/it be patented?”
Clearly, we have a long way to go in answering these questions, not to mention the difficulty in developing safe and effective transgenic interventions. But one thing is becoming increasingly clear, and that’s the insufficiency of the term “human” as the signifier of some kind of moral delineator. Rather, we should adopt a non-species approach to the issue and start looking out for the interests of persons instead.
Or as Glenn further posited at the Yale Personhood conference last December:“Boundaries will blend and blur, and the question will not be who or what are persons, but what sort of beings do we want to be?”
Continued in Part 6 – GENETIC ENGINEERING