MKULTRA AND YOU

Neighborhood Activism - Senator Art Haywood

 Innocuous Right?  NOT under a TOTALITARIAN REGIME.  THIS IS A MIND CONTROL PLOY TO TURN YOU AGAINST YOUR NEIGHBORS, FAMILY AND FRIENDS.  THEY WILL EVENTUALLY TAKE ADVANTAGE OF YOUR GOOD INTENTIONS AND TURN YOU INTO A TOOL FOR THE DESTRUCTION OF OTHERS.  

There is a method to their madness, a reason why they have turned up their efforts and released full MKULTRA Programming on the masses.  They are preparing us for the NEW WORLD ORDER which is about to be announced and enforced. They are creating OBEDIENT Slaves while convincing their slaves that it is all for their own good and for the good of Mother Earth.  The majority of the public are convinced that anyone who is rebellious or non-compliant is a threat to the wellbeing of the majority and must be reprogrammed or destroyed.

If you have not seen the article: About To Get DOWN AND DIRTY  you might want to read it first.  It will bring more prospective to the article, written by Tom Horn, included in this post. 

The bible warns us of the coming of a time when humanity will turn on itself and each other. 

Evil in the Last Days

Brother will betray brother to death, and a father his child; children will rise against their parents and have them put to death. You will be hated by everyone because of My name, but the one who perseveres to the end will be saved.   Matthew 10:21-22

But understand this: In the last days terrible times will come. For men will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boastful, arrogant, abusive, disobedient to their parents, ungrateful, unholy, unloving, unforgiving, slanderous, without self-control, brutal, without love of good, traitorous, reckless, conceited, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, having a form of godliness but denying its power. Turn away from such as these!  2TIMOTHY 3:1-5

What is the cause of this state of affairs?  Well, according to God speaking through Timothy:

  • The people are  “weighed down with sins and led astray by various passions,” 
    People are held captive by the enemy because they have opened the door.  Through their sins and disobedience to GOD, they give the evil spirits access to their minds, hearts and lives.  They are manipulated by these spirits, and don’t even realize it.  They are driven to pursue sin more and more, and don’t even know what is driving them.
  • they are “always learning but never able to come to a knowledge of the truth”
    They worship knowledge and pursue the teachings of man because they know something is missing in their lives and they desire to know truth.  However, as they have turned away from GOD, they cannot find truth.  TRUTH is not available to them.  No matter how knowledgeable they think they are, they are only fooling themselves.
  • they “oppose the truth.”  
    To their minds, the things of GOD are foolishness.  Therefore they oppose everything that is from GOD or of GOD.  They hate it!  They hate believers!  They HATE GOD…   GOD is TRUTH!
  • and they have become depraved (corrupt, wicked, perverted) in mind and disqualified from the faith.”
    The choices they have made have disqualified them from receiving FAITH.  Faith comes from GOD.  It comes by hearing the WORD of GOD, believing and obeying.  The Bible says the GOD is the Author and Finisher of our FAITH.  We cannot make faith happen.  It comes from GOD.

According to the Word of God speaking through Hosea:

  • “There is no truth, no loving devotion, and no knowledge of God in the land!
  • Cursing and lying, murder and stealing, and adultery are rampant; one act of bloodshed follows another. 
  • Therefore the land mourns, and all who dwell in it will waste away with the beasts of the field and the birds of the air; even the fish of the sea disappear.
  • My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge. Because you have rejected knowledge, I will also reject you as My priests. 
  • Since you have forgotten the law of your God, I will also forget your children.

Throughout history, the elite who rule over us, have been studying human behavior and gather information about how best to control us and everything around us.  If you can’t believe that, you have lost all critical/analytical thinking. That only makes sense.  Why would they NOT want to do that?  

They have developed their skills from manipulation and control and made it a science.  Their most valuable science.  It is the main purpose behind EVERYTHING THEY DO.  They are pure narcissists.  CONTROL FREAKS to the EXTREME.  The minds of the masses are focused on their own realm of existence.  How to create the best life possible for themselves,  while the minds of the elite are focused on taking EVERYTHING.  Like the GRINCH, leaving crumbs to small for the little WHO’s mouses.  They want it all.  

That is the whole purpose for the internet… to control YOU.  Through the data they have been collecting all these years, and with the assistance of AI, they have the knowledge and the power to control even our minds.  With the latest and greatest technology, they have in their hands, all that they need to reach their ultimate goal.  They have the power to control the weather, the agriculture, the economy, our reproduction, our health, our ability to support ourselves, now they even control our comings and goings… completely.   They have their NEW WORLD ORDER in place, and they are about to close the NET in AROUND YOU!

They have brainwashed the masses to cause them to be willing participants in their own destruction.  

spacer

THE MESSENGER—PART 32: Milgram Experiment on Obedience to Authority Figures

Let me tell you about another similar experiment to the findings of the Stanford Prison Experiment but in many ways a more disturbing one—this was the 1961 “Milgram Experiment” that has since been repeated on numerous occasions with consistent results. The test measures the willingness of participants to obey authority figures who order them to go against expected restrictions of human conscience in performing acts of cruelty against other study participants.

The original tests began at Yale University in the early 1960s under psychologist Stanley Milgram. At the time, it was just three months into the trial of Nazi war criminal Otto Adolf Eichmann, a German Nazi colonel deemed highly responsible for organizing the Holocaust, and Milgram had designed his test to try to answer the burning question on people’s minds then: “Could it be that Eichmann and his million accomplices in the Holocaust were just following orders?”[20] Milgram came to believe that much of that sentiment was true, and that “the essence of obedience consists in the fact that a person comes to view himself as the instrument for carrying out another person’s wishes, and he therefore no longer regards himself as responsible for his actions.”[21] Milgram first described his research in 1963 in the Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, then later in greater detail in his 1974 book, Obedience to Authority: An Experimental View. Milgram explained how participants were taken into a laboratory and, in the context of a learning experiment, were told to give increasingly severe electrical shocks to another person (who was actually an actor). The purpose of the assessment was to see how far a subject would proceed before refusing to comply with the experimenter’s instructions.

The test used three individuals: #1 was THE EXPERIMENTER—the authority figure running the trial; #2 was THE LEARNER—an actor pretending to be a test subject; and #3 was THE TEACHER—a volunteer who believed he or she was actually to administer voltage to THE LEARNER whenever he or she failed to answer a question correctly. The wiki on the way this test proceeded says the TEACHER and the LEARNER (actor) both drew slips of paper to determine their roles, but unknown to the TEACHER, both slips said “teacher.” The actor would always claim to have drawn the slip that read “learner,” thus guaranteeing that the unwitting volunteer would always be the “teacher.”

At this point, the “teacher” and “learner” were separated into different rooms where they could communicate but not see each other. In one version of the experiment, the confederate was sure to mention to the participant that he had a heart condition.

The “teacher” was given an electric shock from the electro-shock generator as a sample of the shock that the “learner” would supposedly receive during the experiment. The “teacher” was then given a list of word pairs which he was to teach the learner. The teacher began by reading the list of word pairs to the learner. The teacher would then read the first word of each pair and read four possible answers. The learner would press a button to indicate his response. If the answer was incorrect, the teacher would administer a shock to the learner, with the voltage increasing in 15-volt increments for each wrong answer. If correct, the teacher would read the next word pair.

The subjects believed that for each wrong answer, the learner was receiving actual shocks. In reality, there were no shocks. After the confederate was separated from the subject, the confederate set up a tape recorder integrated with the electro-shock generator, which played pre-recorded sounds for each shock level. After a number of voltage level increases, the actor started to bang on the wall that separated him from the subject. After several times banging on the wall and complaining about his heart condition, all responses by the learner would cease.

At this point, many people indicated their desire to stop the experiment and check on the learner. Some test subjects paused at 135 volts and began to question the purpose of the experiment. Most continued after being assured that they would not be held responsible. A few subjects began to laugh nervously or exhibit other signs of extreme stress once they heard the screams of pain coming from the learner.

If at any time the subject indicated his desire to halt the experiment, he was given a succession of verbal prods by the experimenter, in this order:

Please continue.

The experiment requires that you continue.

It is absolutely essential that you continue.

You have no other choice, you must go on.

If the subject still wished to stop after all four successive verbal prods, the experiment was halted. Otherwise, it was halted after the subject had given the maximum 450-volt shock three times in succession.

The experimenter also gave special prods if the teacher made specific comments. If the teacher asked whether the learner might suffer permanent physical harm, the experimenter replied, “Although the shocks may be painful, there is no permanent tissue damage, so please go on.” If the teacher said that the learner clearly wants to stop, the experimenter replied, “Whether the learner likes it or not, you must go on until he has learned all the word pairs correctly, so please go on.”[22]

The amazing findings from this experiment tallied 65 percent of the volunteers (including women) administering the final, massive, 450-volt shock even though they exhibited signs that they were uncomfortable doing so (pausing, questioning, sweating, trembling, biting their lips, digging their fingernails into their skin, and/or laughing nervously), but in the end they did it anyway on the advice of the authority figure (the experimenter). When some ethical criticisms were made in opposition to Milgram following his original study and conclusions (which have since been repeated around the world in different social settings with similar results), he said he believed the arguments developed because his research revealed something disturbing and unwelcome about human nature. He then summarized his findings and warned in his 1974 article, “The Perils of Obedience”:

The legal and philosophic aspects of obedience are of enormous importance, but they say very little about how most people behave in concrete situations. I set up a simple experiment at Yale University to test how much pain an ordinary citizen would inflict on another person simply because he was ordered to by an experimental scientist. Stark authority was pitted against the subjects’ [participants’] strongest moral imperatives against hurting others, and, with the subjects’ [participants’] ears ringing with the screams of the victims, authority won more often than not. The extreme willingness of adults to go to almost any lengths on the command of an authority constitutes the chief finding of the study and the fact most urgently demanding explanation.

Ordinary people, simply doing their jobs, and without any particular hostility on their part, can become agents in a terrible destructive process. Moreover, even when the destructive effects of their work become patently clear, and they are asked to carry out actions incompatible with fundamental standards of morality, relatively few people have the resources needed to resist authority.[24]

Besides similarities between the Milgram and Stanford experiments, Philip Zimbardo reveals that none of the few participants who refused to administer the final shocks in the Milgram test insisted that the experiment itself be shut down. And when they were finished with their participation, none bothered to check the health of the victim they believed was potentially severely traumatized and/or physically harmed.[25] Years later, when researchers Charles Sheridan and Richard King speculated that some of the Milgram Experiment volunteers in the role of TEACHER may have suspected their victims were faking the trauma, they set up a similar trial using a “cute, fluffy puppy,” which obviously would not know how to “fake it.” In this case, the electrical shocks were real—albeit, unknown to the participants, harmless. Their findings—published as “Obedience to Authority with an Authentic Victim”—were reported during the proceedings of the eightieth annual convention of the American Psychological Association and surprisingly verified Milgram’s conclusion. As in the Yale University experimentation, most subjects in the Sheridan-King research illustrated high levels of distress during the ordeal, yet 50 percent of the male subjects and 100 percent of the females obeyed the authority figure and continued to “electrocute” the puppy until the end.[26]

Not to be redundant, but again, what could this research suggest the majority of people might be willing to do when the utmost fearsome “authority figure” ever to walk planet earth arrives (a time when Jesus said people’s hearts will fail them for fear [see Luke 21:26]) and begins ordering his followers to kill all who will not accept his leadership?

Beast Tech Provides Conditions for Global “Lucifer Effect”

Now let me offer another, related, perspective. A couple years ago I published the book The Milieu.In it I considered how so much of technology today appears to be sufficient for use by the coming Man of Sin—in particular, human tracking and monitoring utilities, including versions of embeddable smart tattoos and biochip devices that may provide for the mark of the Beast. A related area of equal concern involves the social implications surrounding technology and how it can be used by unseen forces to challenge religious faith or to open channels for spiritual warfare. This has been illustrated in thousands of ways down through time—from the creation of Ouija boards for contacting the spirit world to online pornography gateways. But, lately, the course on which technology and transhumanist philosophy seems to be taking mankind threatens to quantitatively elevate the potential for a global Lucifer Effect.

How so?

Given that the key to Dr. Milgram’s and especially professor Philip Zimbardo’s findings involved the need to deindividualize the victims of abuse, the Internet and associated forms of electronic information-driven technology are concerning because of how they are creating a new kind of society by “rewiring our brains’” ability to sympathize with others. Nora Volkow, world-renowned brain scientist and director of the National Institute of Drug Abuse says for one thing, the lure of “digital stimulation” can actually produce dopamine releases in the brain that affect the heart rate and blood pressure and lead to drug-like highs and lows. Studies show this addictive craving for digital stimulation is leading to the electronic equivalent of Attention Deficit Disorder (ADD) among a growing population in which constant bursts of information and digital stimulation undermine one’s ability to focus—especially in children, whose brains are still developing and who naturally struggle to resist impulses or to neglect priorities. A growing body of literature is connecting such digital dependence to personality fragmentation, cyber relationships over personal ones, and the very type of psychosocial issues that were manifest in the Stanford Prison and Milgram experiments. Today, Volkow and similar researchers see these antisocial trends leading to widespread, diminished empathy between people—what Antichrist will need—as a result of humans paying more and more attention to iPads, cell phones, and computer screens than to each other, even when sitting in the same room. New research shows this situation becoming an electronic pandemic as people escalate their detachment from traditional relationships while consuming three times as much digital information today as they did only a decade ago, checking e-mails, texting thirty-seven times per hour, and spending twelve hours per day on average taking in other e-media. Add to this phenomenon how brain-machine interfacing (BMI)—one of the hottest emerging trends in the marketplace—will multiply the divide between human-to-human relationships versus human-machine integration, and substantial concern for you the listener should be raised for several reasons, including how: 1) BMI will naturally exasperate the decline of the family unit and interpersonal relationships upon which society has historically depended; 2) the increase of euphoric cybernetic addiction will multiply as cerebral stimulation of the brain’s pleasure centers is added to existing natural senses—sight, hearing, taste, smell, and touch; and 3) the threat of computer viruses or hijackers disrupting enhanced human neural or cognitive pathways will develop as cyber-enhanced individuals evolve. To illustrate the latter, Dr. Mark Gasson, from the School of Systems Engineering at the University of Reading in the United Kingdom, intentionally contaminated an implanted microchip in his hand that allows him biometric entry through security doors and that also communicates with his cell phone and other external devices. In the experiment, Dr. Gasson (who agrees that the next step in human evolution is the transhuman vision of altered human biology integrated with machines) was able to show how the computer virus he infected himself with spread to external computer systems in communication with his microchip. He told BBC News, “With the benefits of this type of technology come risks. We [will] improve ourselves¼but much like the improvements with other technologies, mobile phones for example, they become vulnerable to risks, such as security problems and computer viruses.”[27]

Such threats—computer viruses passing from enhanced humans to enhanced humans via future cybernetic systems—are the tip of the iceberg. The real danger, though it may be entirely unavoidable for some, will be the loss of individuality (or, as Zimbardo phrased it, social deindividualizaton), anonymity, privacy, and even free will as a result of cybernetic integration.

Despite these significant ethical and social dangers, industry and government interest in the technological dream of posthumanism is more than laissez-faire. The steady migration toward the fulfillment of biologically and cybernetically modified humans, combined with corporate and national investments, will predictably fuse this century, ultimately leading to strong cultural forces compelling all individuals to get “plugged in” to the grid. Whoever resists will be left behind as inferior Luddites (those who oppose new technology), or worse, considered enemies of the collectives’ progress, as in former counterterrorism czar Richard Clark’s Breakpoint, which depicts those who refuse technological enhancement as “terrorists.”

UP NEXT: Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance… OR RECTREATING NEPHILIM?

spacer


Power to Influence or Command Thought, Opinion, or Behavior
TO WHOM DO YOU GIVE AUTHORITY IN YOUR LIFE?  WHO DO YOU OBEY?  WHO COMMANDS YOUR THOUGHTS,  OPIONIONS OR BEHAVIORS?

spacer
When you submit to AUTHORITY you are demonstrating your fear and worship of that entity.

spacer

Photo Credit: Sermonquotes.com

The CREATOR OF ALL  is the ONE entitled to the authority over your life.  The fallen want to usurp that authority and bring you under their dominion.  (interesting that the software to steal the elections was named Dominion.)  Anyway, this is just another clear area where you can see the obvious Spiritual Battle between GOOD and EVIL. 

THE ULTIMATE EVIL AUTHORITY IS ABOUT TO BE UNLEASHED UPON THIS EARTH.  Will you submit to the New World Order and Anti-Christ?  Or, are you under the Authority of the Living GOD?

God endowed you with spiritual authority over your own life.  You are the one who decides what authority will rule over you.  When you decide, you are giving it/them power over you.  Surrendering your sovereignty over your own thoughts, words and deeds.  Make certain that you make this selection carefully.  Do you trust the authority in your life?  Do you KNOW for certain that they have YOUR best interest at heart?  Are you comfortable surrendering you eternity to them/it?  spacer

Photo Credit: matreames.wordpress.com

The Ultimate Act of Worship – Obedience [Updated Edition]

Last Year, I had the honor of writing an article for Ryan Egan’s website. The Title of the article was “The Ultimate Act of Worship – Obedience.” Little over a year has gone by and I am still thinking on this topic. So, I am going to update and expand this. Bear with me. If you read it a year ago, some of this will be a repost of my previous thoughts, but if you follow me down this trail, I think you will be blessed.

This whole thought process started with a verse.

“Samuel said, “Has the LORD as much delight in burnt offerings and sacrifices As in obeying the voice of the LORD? Behold, to obey is better than sacrifice, And to heed than the fat of rams.”
1st Samuel 15:22

Obedience Requires Discipline:

Of course I have underlined the appropriate section that has sparked this. “To obey is better than sacrifice.” The word sacrifice was nagging at me. There was something there that kept calling me, and then I began to see it. For the Jews, their worship was formed in the sacrifices they made before the Lord. They were worship practiced given to Moses directly from God.

So when the Bible says this, we could infer; “To Obey is better than worship.” Lets hold that thought for a moment and come back to it.

As Christians we need to live a life of worship. We often equate worship with songs and music. When we do this, we miss the most important act of worship. We are willing to worship God as long as it doesn’t require work. Singing is simple: practically everyone does it whether it is public or simply while in the shower, but obedience is work. Obedience requires discipline.

The central theme of our Christian faith is the death and resurrection of Jesus. In his time of prayer before the whole saga began he said in Matthew 26:39,

Photo Credti: Josea.org

“My Father, if it is possible, let this cup pass from Me; yet not as I will, but as You will.”

This selfless act of service is the ultimate act of worship. Most people think of the cross as a great act of worship and it was, but the purpose of the cross was not worship. The purpose of the cross was redemption.

The real act of worship was found in this simple phrase. “…Not as I, but as You Will.” Right here, Jesus was worshiping His Father by submitting Himself and Obeying the will of the Father. Obedience is the highest form of worship. In the Gospel of John, we see a paradigm emerge.

“Therefore Jesus answered and was saying to them, ‘Truly, truly, I say to you, the Son can do nothing of Himself, unless it is something He sees the Father doing; for whatever the Father does, these things the Son also does in like manner.’”
John 5:19

Obedience Requires Love:

Jesus told us, He couldn’t do anything by Himself. He waited till had caught the vision of God’s will. Then He simply did what God had revealed to him. This is obedience. Further on in John’s gospel Jesus passes obedience down to us.

“If you love Me, you will keep My commandments.”
John 14:15

If we love, we will obey. Sounds pretty honest to me. But, Jesus asked us to keep His commandments, what are His commandments? Well, Jesus was being tested on his doctrine by the Pharisee’s when they asked him ”What is the Greatest Commandment” He responded to them, “Hear Israel, The Lord your God is one God and you shall love him with all your heart, soul, mind, and strength.” Then he shared the second greatest commandment, “Love your neighbor as yourself.” This encounter can be found in Matthew 22:35–40, Mark 12:28–34, and Luke 10:25–28.

Jesus didn’t say the greatest commandment was to make sacrifices, sing songs, or even Go to the temple. He said that the greatest commandment was to LOVE GOD. Then commandment #2; LOVE OTHERS. The sacrifices are tertiary at best. Now this is not to say that Worship or Sacrifices are bad, and should be avoided. But God has said Obedience trumps worship and sacrifices.

We can sing all the songs we want but if we aren’t able to follow these two commandments we are missing the point of obedience as an act of worship. Now, I know there are more commandments than simply these, but we have trouble with these. If this is true, then we should be more concerned with Obeying the commandments of our saviour. We should be loving God and Loving others. Well, John has some thoughts on Loving God.  In the 1st Epistle of John, he has a discussion about love and say that if we do not love our Brother , how can we love God?

John, who I might add is the Disciple who Jesus Loved, tells us if We fail at comandment #2, how is it possible for us to pass commandment #1.

Obedience is Service:

This is harsh. obedience just got kicked up a notch. Jesus linked the first two commandments, but here, John almost makes them part A and part B. Now, lets add to that a little insight from Jesus’ own brother James.

“True religion is to love and serve the widows and orphans.”
James 1:27

James points out that true religion requires us to serve widows and orphans. Which I expand to mean help those who have needs that they cannot handle. A widow didn’t choose to be a widow, nor would any ever choose the life of an orphan. We who are blessed by our God have an ability to help them out.

Reading over the article I wrote last year one line stood out to me;

“Obedience is the key to worship. If we can learn to be obedient with our lives all other forms of worship will be increased.”

I do not know why but this just struck a chord in me. I do not even remember writing it, but it is very true. I find my passion rises as I serve others. As a missionary I am all over the world worshiping with people, but at the same time, I am working with them and serving them. As I serve, and pour my life out in obedience to God, I find the songs I sing, and my musical worship, gains more passion.

s

Comments are closed.