RESTORED: 08/28/2021 – RESTORED 3/8/22
My brother, father, grandfather and yours went willingly into battle, sacrificing everything, for many of them even their lives, for our rights. Including the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness and many more. I shudder to think how we have squandered so precious a gift. May God have mercy on our souls.
Today’s PostModern society has lost all concept of truth. Most have lost their ability of rational, cognitive, critical thinking. Lulled to sleep and brainwashed, they have been programmed into accepting the most ridiculous and destructive deceptions.
They really can’t be blamed, they have been raised by a Satanic/Luciferian/Demonic educational system designed to create in them a hive mind accepting of all the programming crammed into their heads. They have no understanding of true love, honor, or respect.
They have come to believe that to be truly loving and/or tolerant means to embrace ALL practices, no matter how vile or disgusting. They have come to believe that in order to have PEACE, we must surrender our rights and trust in the ALMIGHTY GOVERNMENT.
If they had any sense at all, they could just look at the facts and determine that we are headed at breakneck speed down a very slippery slope into a deep, dark chasm. The folks who have been in control are driven by a dark force much greater than anything earthly. And evil cannot be controlled by any army, government, rules/laws, no matter how many Conventions, Organizations, Contracts, Agreements, Alliances or Covenants man can devise. We will NEVER HAVE PEACE, until we recognize THE PRINCE OF PEACE!
I know this article is lengthy and deep. Please, I think you owe those who paid such a cost for your freedom to at least educate yourself on what is happening to the rights for which they fought and died. The articles and portions of articles posted here were thoroughly researched and presented in an effort to bring about a positive change, for your benefit. Many of the people who have shared this information have paid with their jobs, their security, and some even their lives. For more info on the UN click: here
UPDATE 4/5/19
UPDATE 4/1/19
These are old videos (2015) but they clearly lay out the UN Agenda and what it means for YOU. Please listen to them and then decide for yourself if this is not exactly what is happening. Even the things that the man on the video said were not possible in 2015, they are DOING today. Weather manipulation, mass migration, etc. THIS IS HAPPENING and YOU will suffer the consequences.
It is not my intention to promote the John Birch Society or any other group. These videos are posted strictly on the basis of their content.
Published on Mar 25, 2019
Published on Aug 17, 2015
UPDATE 3/20/19
Published on Feb 21, 2013
This woman is on automatic pilot. She is the epitome of a Marxist-Leninist and she is not even aware of what she is because she is following the George Soros script of how to take down a country from within. What is amazing is why anyone would listen to this utter nonsense. This fact alone explains how dumbed down America has become. The Green New Deal contains nothing that is traditionally American.AOC had nothing to do with the New (Gang) Green Deal. In a recent interview, Pat Wood revealed the origins of this monstrosity. Here is the story of the planned demise of the American economy and constitution via the radical left wing of the Democratic Party.
spacer
They used it as a vehicle to take the moral high ground, to claim only they cared about the environment. They argue that everyone else was guilty of environmental destruction because of their avarice and wasteful ways.
Environmentalism as a political agenda is pushed by extremely wealthy and powerful left wing people who made their money exploiting the environment. The psychology of that is beyond the realm of this discussion, but consider the hypocrisy of George Soros, Maurice Strong, Bill Gates, the Rockefeller’s, Leonardo DiCaprio, Ted Turner among many others. The confusion is similar to surrounding another person who most people think was a right wing fascist, but was in fact a socialist promoting environmentalism, Adolf Hitler. (Nazi stands for “National Socialism.”)
Collectively, most of these environmentalists people acted through their privileged group called the Club of Rome. The founding meeting of the Club occurred in 1968 at David Rockefeller’s estate in Bellagio, Italy. In their 1994 book “The First Global Revolution,” they declared:
“The common enemy of humanity is man. In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. All these dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy then, is humanity itself.”
They claim the list of enemies is designed to unite people. In fact, it is needed to overcome what they see as the divisiveness of nation-states and to justify the establishment of one-world government or global socialism. Global warming is a global problem, they insist, that national governments alone cannot resolve.
They finally settled on global warming as the environmental issue best suited for their goal. Of course, the plan is just the beginning. One of my favorite cartoons from “The New Yorker” showed Moses on the mountain with the Ten Commandments. The caption read “Great idea, who is going to fund it?” Global warming and the identification of human produced CO2 as the problem suited all the political, financial, and religious controls, a socialist group desire.
The Kyoto Protocol was presented as a solution to the problem of human-caused global warming. Those who created the Protocol also created the problem. Through the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) they produced the science required to support their claim. It is a well-thought-out, well-planned, classic circular argument. Create the problem, create the proof of the problem — then offer the solution.
They said, incorrectly, that a CO2 increase causes temperature increase. They provided proof. They programmed their computer models so that a CO2 increase caused a temperature increase. They ran the model(s) while keeping all else steady, what in science is called “ceteris paribus.” Naturally, the model results showed a temperature increase, which they then claimed proved their thesis.
CO2 through Kyoto provided the religious basis for the socialist agenda. Nations who developed their economies and became wealthy using CO2 were now supposed to pay for their sins by giving money to those nations who suffered. It was a penance. In the medieval Catholic Church, you could buy indulgences to bypass the punishment of hell. Carbon credits are the modern equivalent, and Al Gore was the equivalent of The Pardoner selling indulgences, depicted in Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales.
CO2 through Kyoto provided the political basis for the socialist agenda: the redistribution of wealth with money taken from the successful developed nations and given to the less successful developing nations. This operation required one-world government and a world banking agency.
CO2 through Kyoto provided the financial basis for the socialist agenda. Money needed to fund the socialist government was to come in the form of a global carbon tax. The November 2009 Conference of the Parties 15 (COP15) in Copenhagen, involved finalizing details of the Kyoto Protocol, including a carbon tax gathered by the International Monetary Fund.
Somebody knew the political agenda was based on the false science and leaked emails from the Climatic Research Unit (CRU) as evidence. The major scientists controlling the IPCC worked at the CRU. The disclosure effectively delayed the political process because the COP can only act on the science provided by the IPCC. The delay was only temporary because most didn’t understand the science or know the implications of the leaked emails.
In 2010 at COP16 in Durban they produced the replacement socialist program called the Green Climate Fund (GCF). COP21 in Paris in December 2015 authorized the process.
Vaclav Klaus, former President of the Czech Republic, was the only world leader to identify what was going on. I heard speak at the Heartland Climate Conference in New York in 2004. His opening comment was that the world went through 70 years of communism, so why the hell would you want to go back to it?
He made his case effectively in his book “Blue Planet in Green Shackles” where he wrote:
“It should be clear by now to everyone that activist environmentalism (or environmental activism) is becoming a general ideology about humans, about their freedom, about the relationship between the individual and the state, and about the manipulation of people under the guise of a “noble” idea. It is not an honest pursuit of “sustainable development,” a matter of elementary environmental protection, or search for rational mechanisms design to achieve a healthy environment. Yet things do occur that make you shake your head remind yourself that you live neither is Joseph Stalin’s Communist era, you’re in the Orwellian utopia of 1984.”
spacer
TO WATCH THIS VIDEO ON BITCHUTE CLICK THE TITLE LINK BELOWspacer
Published on May 20, 2018
spacer
TO WATCH THIS VIDEO ON BITCHUTE CLICK THE TITLE LINK BELOWUS Government agrees to allow UN Peace keepers to help with Gun Confiscation. What people don’t seem to get is: 1. Trump does nothing on his own, he does exactly as his Corporate and Tribal masters tell him to do. 2. Trump is a Zionist- Communist Israel firster Rothschild tool and what they say goes .. The USA has been operating under the National Emergencies Act, 50 U.S.C. 1622(d) and the War powers Act. since 911 also Continuity of Government (“COG”) measures were implemented on 9/11 .. Continuity of Government planning has arguably already superseded the Constitution as a higher authority.June 29 marked the end of the Third Review Conference (RevCon) of the United Nations’ Programme of Action (PoA) on Small Arms and Light Weapons. Delegates at the conference, including representatives of the United States, worked on producing updates to the global gun-control agreement. Regarding the implementation of the PoA at the national level, the final draft of the report of the latest RevCon lists six points to which all member states agreed to advance within their respective domestic governments.
3 years, 8 months ago
spacer
TO WATCH THIS VIDEO ON BITCHUTE CLICK THE TITLE LINK BELOWGrab a 6-in-1 flashlight/emergency charger:
http://www.patriotcharger.com (use IMPACT20) for 20% off!
🔵 Get my Weekly Newsletter: http://bit.ly/HighImpactFlixOfficial (don’t forget to CONFIRM)
👕 A Snowflake-melting Shirt, Hoodie or Mug makes a great GIFT!
https://teespring.com/stores/highimpactflix 1 year, 7 months ago
FBI assembling GUN CONFISCATION master list
The FBI is assembling a nationwide gun confiscation “master list” in preparation for a government assault on the People.
Learn more at Guns.news or SelfDefense.news
For more updates, visit: brighteon.com/channel/hrreport
FBI, guns, NICS, gun confiscation, Second Amendment, gun rights, self-defense, tyranny, liberty, evil government
The FBI is assembling a nationwide gun confiscation “master list” in preparation for a government assault on the People.
Learn more at http://Guns.news or http://SelfDefense.news
For more updates, visit: http://www.brighteon.com/channel/hrreport
NaturalNews videos would not be possible without you, as always we remain passionately dedicated to our mission of educating people all over the world on the subject of natural healing remedies and personal liberty (food freedom, medical freedom, the freedom of speech, etc.). Together, we’re helping create a better world, with more honest food labeling, reduced chemical contamination, the avoidance of toxic heavy metals and vastly increased scientific transparency. 2 years, 6 months ago
spacer
Fighting Rights Confiscation Not Just Gun Confiscation!
Published on Mar 5, 2019
Innocents Betrayed A Brief History of ‘Gun Confiscation’
Published on Mar 8, 2018
UNITED NATIONS QUIETLY PUSHES INTERNATIONAL GUN CONTROL
The United Nations’ International Action Network on Small Arms (IANSA) is finishing up their Global Week of Action Against Gun Violence. According to IANSA, the goal of the week-long meeting is “for us to advocate collectively for an end to illicit trade and misuse of small arms and light weapons.”
Click here to see more 2A articles like this one.
What The Program’s Focus Is On
The week-long initiative took place one month before the Third Review Conference (RevCon3) on the UN Programme of Action to Prevent, Combat and Eradicate the Illicit Trade in Small Arms and Light Weapons. …During a speech at the Global Week of Action Against Gun Violence, UN Disarmament Affairs Chief, Izumi Nakamitsu, made the United Nations’ stance on guns very clear.
“Every day, hundreds of lives are lost due to gun violence worldwide. Guns are responsible for about half of all violent deaths – nearly a quarter-million each year,” Nakamitsu said, according to the UN website.
According to the United Nations, gun violence can be traced back to “a lack of adequate legislation and regulation on gun control; an insufficient ability to enforce existing laws; youth unemployment and a lack of job opportunities for former gang members and ex-combatants.”
“The international community must present a united front against gun violence which kills nearly 250,000 each year and injures many more,” Nakamitsu said during her speech.
UN QUIETLY ADVANCING INTERNATIONAL GUN CONFISCATION
Goal 11) Make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable
Translation: Ban all gun ownership by private citizens, concentrating guns into the hands of obedient government enforcers who rule over an unarmed, enslaved class of impoverished workers. Criminalize living in most rural areas by instituting -style “protected areas” which the government will claim are owned by “the People” even though no people are allowed to live there. Force all humans into densely packed, tightly controlled cities where they are under 24/7 surveillance and subject to easy manipulation by government.
“The UN is planning nothing less than a global government tyranny that enslaves all of humanity while calling the scheme ‘sustainable development’ and ‘equality.’”
That’s exactly right. This is just one among a plethora of reasons why the UN should be abandoned by the united States. We should not keep it on life support. We should pull all our resources to it and any support for it, including housing the UN on our shores.
UNITED NATIONS PLAN FOR GLOBAL GUN CONFISCATION. IANSA?
Freedom Outpost
Applying a gender perspective to the small arms issue means understanding the different ways that men, women, boys and girls engage in, are affected by, and respond to gun violence. It is key to developing effective solutions to the problem.
spacer
The IANSA Women’s Network is the only international network focused on the connections between gender, women’s rights, small arms and armed violence.
The IANSA Women’s Network consists of individuals and groups working to:
- Stop gun violence against women in the home, on the streets or on the battlefield;
- Involve women fully in peacemaking, peacebuilding and disarmament;
- Ensure that women’s perspectives and experiences are taken fully into account in policies and programmes on guns and gun violence reduction;
- Reduce military spending;
- Break the link between violence and masculinity;
- Prevent gun violence around the world.
Together we produce information materials, advocate for new policies, and engage with civil society, governments and international organisations.
Watch the Global Week of Action Against Gun Violence Campaign 2021 Video:
spacer
UN Quietly Advancing International Gun Confiscation
I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again, there is no gun control, there is only gun confiscation, and this is exactly what the United Nations is quietly advancing while other things take precedence in the news today.
The United Nations’ International Action Network on Small Arms (IANSA) is getting ready to hold their annual 2018 Global Week of Action Against Gun Violence from May 7 to May 14, 2018.
Now, part of the problem of the UN lies in the fact that anyone actually acknowledges that they have any authority over any nation to promote the restriction of the right for the people to keep and bear arms. Yet, they promote such tyranny all the time.
Trending: Nancy Pelosi Refuses To Take Coronavirus Test Despite Being Exposed
The “Week of Action” is no exception.
take our poll – story continues belowNow, this year’s theme is “End the Crisis of Gun Violence.” Consider that the UN is largely populated by Communists, Islamists and other totalitarian led countries, but the theme sounds strangely familiar, doesn’t it, David Hogg? It’s because it’s the same ideology that drives it.
According to CPNN (Culture of Peace News Network):
“Taking place one month before the Third Review Conference (RevCon3) on the UN Programme of Action to Prevent, Combat and Eradicate the Illicit Trade in Small Arms and Light Weapons in All Its Aspects (PoA), this year’s Week of Action will be an opportunity for urge governments to:
* Exert greater control over ammunition–the component that makes guns lethal.
* Make concrete commitments to increasing women’s participation in small arms control.
* Provide greater support for survivors of gun violence.
* Crack down on corruption that facilitates the illicit trade in small arms and ammunition.
* Enact or strengthen legislation to disarm domestic violence abusers.
Within communities, the WoA is also a chance to:
* Raise awareness of intimate partner violence and the increased dangers of having a gun in the home.
* Network with young people who are also concerned about gun violence and help amplify their voices.
* Raise awareness of the support that survivors of gun violence need.
* Bring civil society organizations together for a common goal.
* Raise awareness of the Sustainable Development Goals–particularly SDG 16.4, “significantly reduce illicit financial and arms flows”, SDG 5.2, “eliminate all forms of violence against all women and girls”, and SDG 4.A, the aim to “provide safe, non-violent, inclusive and effective learning environments for all”.
Suggested actions for the week include:
* Meeting with parliamentarians or government officials to press for concrete actions and compromises to reduce gun violence that can be reported at RevCon3;
* Engaging media outlets to ensure gun control and disarmament remain a priority in your country – linking it with the upcoming RevCon3;
* Launching a social media campaign (Twitter, Facebook, Instagram and blogs) to push governments to take meaningful and effective actions to prevent gun violence. Where possible, use the hashtags #WeekOfAction #EndGunViolence #IANSA
* Holding seminars or workshops
* Organizing rallies or marches
* Participating in television, radio or newspaper interviews
* Conducting community awareness surveys
* Holding sports or arts activities that highlight the importance of reducing gun violence
* Releasing relevant studies and publications”
I don’t know what President Donald Trump was thinking when he continued to promote the UN during his first speech to it. Perhaps, he honestly thought he could sway these people, but in either case, they are doing just as they did before and advancing an agenda that is anti-American with American dollars.
Sounds to me like it’s overdue for Congress to put an end to funding the UN permanently and entirely, and to evict them from our shores.
One thing to understand and that is that the UN actually deems its agenda as “disarmament.” According to the United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs:
Under the Programme of Action to Prevent, Combat and Eradicate the Illicit Trade in Small Arms and Light Weapons in All Its Aspects (PoA), governments agreed to improve national small arms laws, import/export controls, and stockpile management – and to engage in cooperation and assistance.
In 2005 they also adopted the International Tracing Instrument (ITI), which requires States to ensure that weapons are properly marked and that records are kept. Moreover, it provides a framework for cooperation in weapons tracing – fulfilling one of the commitments governments made in the Programme of Action. Improving weapons tracing is now part of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.
At least they are somewhat honest about what they are doing rather than cloaking it in language like American Communists who call it gun control.
In a speech at the Global Week of Action Against Gun Violence, UN Disarmament Affairs Chief Izumi Nakamitsu told the world exactly what the position of the UN is when it comes to arms and the God-given right to keep and bear them.
“Every day, hundreds of lives are lost due to gun violence worldwide. Guns are responsible for about half of all violent deaths – nearly a quarter-million each year,” Nakamitsu said.
The UN claims that gun violence can be traced back to “a lack of adequate legislation and regulation on gun control; an insufficient ability to enforce existing laws; youth unemployment and a lack of job opportunities for former gang members and ex-combatants.”
“The international community must present a united front against gun violence which kills nearly 250,000 each year and injures many more,” Nakamitsu added.
Nakamitsu also said that the UN’s gun confiscation agenda is a part of its larger goal of Agenda 2030.
Stop and think a moment. Nakamitsu is either truly ignorant of the facts or is lying. I don’t think she is ignorant.
We know that America has the largest armed population in the world, and yet, when it comes to our murder rate, we aren’t even in the top 100 countries, many of those ahead of us have the strictest gun confiscation legislation in the world!
However, even in that, the incidents involving guns usually occur most heavily in areas of the US with the strictest gun confiscation legislation.
The UN is simply out to deceive the people.
While I grant that the UN doesn’t specifically make policy or law when it comes to the US, the fact is that Agenda 21 has been advancing in the US even though we never entered into it officially per our Constitution. Therefore, we must be vigilant about what the UN is promoting and lest you think I’m paranoid or a conspiracy theorist when I speak of the UN wanting full gun confiscation, just listen as Mike Adams of Natural News breaks down one of the seventeen points of Agenda 2030.
Goal 11) Make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable
Translation: Ban all gun ownership by private citizens, concentrating guns into the hands of obedient government enforcers who rule over an unarmed, enslaved class of impoverished workers. Criminalize living in most rural areas by instituting Hunger Games-style “protected areas” which the government will claim are owned by “the People” even though no people are allowed to live there. Force all humans into densely packed, tightly controlled cities where they are under 24/7 surveillance and subject to easy manipulation by government.
Adams writes, “The UN is planning nothing less than a global government tyranny that enslaves all of humanity while calling the scheme ‘sustainable development’ and ‘equality.’”
That’s exactly right. This is just one among a plethora of reasons why the UN should be abandoned by the united States. We should not keep it on life support. We should pull all our resources to it and any support for it, including housing the UN on our shores.
Legislation already exists to make this a reality, and the sooner the better. Now, that President Trump has taken a bold step in moving the US embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem in Israel, he should seriously consider pulling all funding to this anti-American, anti-Christian organization and providing them an eviction notice at their headquarters in New York. He’s already demonstrated he will cut funding to some portions of the UN. It’s time to fully pull out of this international body.
Don’t forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook and Twitter, and follow our friends at RepublicanLegion.com.
UPDATE: Video added 2/6/19
Report: United Nations Medical Vehicles Spotted In Mississippi
According to one report, UN medical vehicles have been spotted in Mississippi traveling west on Interstate 10, which is a transcontinental highway that stretches from the Pacific Coast Highway in Santa Monica, California all the way to I-95 in Jacksonville, Florida.
I can find only a single report of this sighting, although the site claims that these vehicles have been spotted throughout the south for a week. Only one picture exists and no video.
UN Vehicles Spotted On The Move Jacksonville Florida .
spacer
The United Nations Exposed: Who Is In Control? – Excellent article full of info, check it out, click the link. Excerpts shown below.
We are told that the United Nations (UN) is an international organization that aims to facilitate co-operation through social progress, economic development, international security, and international law. They promote themselves and are outwardly promoted as a reputable body that deals with peace, security, development, human rights, and humanitarian affairs. With this being the case it’s no surprise to see the UN at the forefront of all international conflict and instability since these exact events give them the ideal atmosphere to promote themselves as bringers of all that I previously mentioned. Throughout history, authoritative figures have always tried to paint a perception of themselves in hopes of influencing and brainwashing the masses into a desired agenda.
… Well, the same ones that own all of our mainstream media networks, also own, run and created the United Nations. The owners of the United Nations use their media networks to influence the perception of billions of people. Not many people know that our mainstream media networks are owned by less than 5 multinational corporations, and all of these corporations have ties to the Rothschild and Rockefeller families. If you dive in even further, all of the same corporations are directly related to suppressing clean energy technologies, like General Electric. You can find out more about free energy suppression here. More ties can be made in the food and medical industries as well. Our planet is owned by a small group of families and the corporations they run, this is no longer a secret, no longer a conspiracy theory. It’s becoming evident that these “people” do not have our best intentions at hand.
League of Nations/Treaty of Versailles
The forerunner to the United Nations was the League of Nations. It was created under the treaty of Versailles in 1919 (8)(14). Many believe the idea of the UN’s creation was due to the second world war, it wasn’t. A plan for global control through a well-disguised body of peace started long before 1945. The League of Nations was an intergovernmental organization created at the Paris peace conference that ended the First World War. Development of international organizations due to conflict is a way of trickery. The UN was created in 1945 as a result of World War 2. Anytime there is global conflict, something is created out of that conflict, to give the illusion that whatever is created out of that conflict is a direct solution to that conflict. Have you ever thought that the ones who created the conflict, are doing so in order to propose the solution? What a scam that would be, wouldn’t it? What a trick, using and controlling our will. Handing our will over to those who look to take advantage of us, to those that are not in service to others, but to themselves. The League of Nations was created by the Rockefeller Family, they were responsible for funding the entire operation(9). At the same time, the International Labour Organization was developed, which is and was heavily funded by the Rockefeller and Rothschild families(10). It is clear that the Rockefeller and Rothschild families both created the United Nations, without them the development of this global organization would not be possible.
The Same Groups That Funded Nazi Germany Created The United Nations? Both Sides of the War Were Funded by the Same Group?
A key question we must ask ourselves when it comes to international global governing bodies is, who is in charge? Who is making the decisions? What connections can be made between the United Nations and the other major governing bodies of planet Earth? How often do we ask these questions? And how often do we make the connections? If the United Nations was created for peace and stability in conflicting Wartime, why would the same parties fund both sides of the war? Was it just for profit, or did they want to create War, to create government bodies that would control our entire planet? The United Nations has branched off into the World Health Organization, which has other branched within it like Codex Alimentarius and the Food and Drug Administration.
… it is easy to see how the real founders of the United Nations (if you follow the money) were connected to many inhumane acts. So what makes you think it has stopped today? What if the United Nations give you the illusion of a peacemaking body, in order to drive chaos, fear, and to fulfill an agenda that started long before we were all born? How can the UN protect us against mining corporations for example, that commit atrocities all over the world, when the same ones who created the UN own all of the major mining corps, like the Rockefeller Hughes Corporation(18). I’ve provided sources for all of my claims, at the same time I like to leave a few out to inspire the readers to do some research. Feel free to look into the Bush connections yourself! Keep in mind, I’ve used only a few examples and connections in this article, there is a tremendous amount that you can make on your own if you are sparked to further your research.
One aspect of the current consciousness shift is waking up to new facts and possibilities of what really happened in our recent human history. Many people take different paths to awakening, but in the end, it all leads to one thing: we have to be the change we want to see. We’ve seen a lot of turmoil throughout the years on this planet, and in turn, it’s created a very dense energetic state for planet Earth. More people are starting to find peace, they are experiencing more joy and desire change for all on planet Earth. Through awakening, we are changing the vibrational frequency of the planet. We’ve been blind to many things for thousands of years. We are living in the age of transparency, everything has presented itself for us to see from the “darkest” experiences to the “lightest”. Either way, you look at it, everything that has and is playing out on planet Earth is all an experience for the human race. Events happen, in order to jolt us into waking up to truth. 9/11 for example, woke many up. Whether it’s the truth about hemp, the federal reserve, the Illuminati, extraterrestrials, spreading love, or anything else, the age of transparency is leading to a new truth within billions of people, and that truth is love. Love is required as a necessary building block for a new world. We are responsible for what is happening here, when we awaken from our sleep, I’m sure we won’t let continue what we’ve let continue for so long. No longer will we be used to uphold a system that does not resonate with us, instead we will create a new one that makes the old one obsolete.
There are multiple sources that go beyond mine, I could have used many more. Please feel free to do your own research to further verify some facts.
“Power Corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely!!” or if you will… “Unlimited power is apt to corrupt the minds of those who possess it” To much power surrendered to any one individual or group will end in NO GOOD THING! Even if that group be a US Congress or a United Nations, supposedly comprised of individuals representing the will of many.
THE UN PREPARES TO IMPLEMENT ONE WORLD
GOVERNMENT AND ONE WORLD RELIGION – By: Mac DominickSubtitle: The United Nations Millennium Assembly in September will gather more heads of state than at any other time in history. Their purpose–gain consensus for the Charter for Global Democracy, which would in effect, transform the UN into a World Government. As if that were not enough, the United Nations is also sponsoring the Millennium World Peace Summit. This summit will gather more than 1000 religious leaders to search for common ground and common values among their respective faiths. This will lay the groundwork for a One World Religion. The UN offers global peace and security as a result of these meetings. Is this going to be Utopia, or will the results be cataclysmic?
The New World Order is coming! Are you ready? Once you understand what this New World Order really is, and how it is being gradually implemented, you will be able to see it progressing in your daily news!!
Learn how to protect yourself, your loved ones!
Stand by for insights so startling you will never look at the news the same way again.
YOU ARE NOW ON THE CUTTING EDGE
The Arab nations and their Palestinian comrades never saw it coming. They finally made the fatal mistake of pushing Israel too far. The ensuing conflict brought all the nations of the world into the fray, but not soon enough to rescue Lebanon, Syria, Jordan, Iraq, parts of Egypt and Saudi Arabia, and the Palestinians from total devastation. With the populations of these nations almost completely annihilated, all of the land that God promised to the descendants of Abraham was now under Israeli control. The World Tribunal of the United Nations responded by mobilizing the global army to move against Israel. The hierarchy of global governance had no choice but to respond with force or face utter humiliation. Their efforts for personal gain under the guise of world peace culminated by leading all of mankind to the very brink of global thermo-nuclear war, and leaving the UN’s bureaucratic system of global governance in shambles.
Mankind had now come to its darkest hour, but out of this darkness the Great Man emerged into the world’s spotlight. He not only seized the reigns of the UN system of global governance, but he also proved his right as the legitimate heir to the Throne of David. In one fell swoop, this man had become the virtual global dictator as well as priest-king of the planet. He succeeded where all others had failed. He transformed the UN’s bureaucratic system into one of a world dictatorship. He also built on the UN’s spiritual foundation and world wide religious ecumenism to implement a one-world religion under his own leadership with the Pope as a more-than-willing puppet. He took the weak, corrupt UN system to the next level, One World Government and One World State Religion.
MILLENNIUM ASSEMBLY
Just as Christians are looking for the coming of Jesus Christ, those involved with the occult or new age beliefs are anxiously awaiting the coming of a system of world government led by the one Christianity will call Antichrist. This is the underlying premise of the New Age Movement, Illuminist Freemasonry, Fabian Socialism, Theosophy, and other occult globalist groups. As a result, many involved in the occult world have embraced the UN as the vehicle by which this system will transpire. Alice Bailey, the leader of the Theosophical Society who authored books “via automatic” writing of the “spirit guide” Dwahl Kuhl, said of the UN, “The UN is the hope of the World.” (1) Bailey has been joined in recent years by other notables such as the late John Denver, David Spangler, Jean Houston, Robert Mueller, and Maurice Strong.
In spite of all this support, the decade of the 1970s saw hopes for world government (with or without the UN) waning, as evidenced by Richard Gardner in the CFR publication, Foreign Affairs:
“What is ‘worst’ about our times for those who wish for rapid progress toward world order is clear enough. The United Nations is very far from being able to discharge the responsibilities assigned by its Charter for the maintenance of international peace and security. The willingness of U.N. members to risk their short-term interests for the good of the community seems at the level of the frontier town in High Noon, where the citizens abandoned their lawman as soon as the outlaw was released from jail… Nor are the world’s principal economic forums in much better shape. In contrast to the accomplishments of happier days, nobody now takes a major issue to ECOSOC, UNCTAD, GATT, IMF or OECD with much hope for a constructive result. Even the European Community threatens to unravel under current economic and political pressures. In this unhappy state of affairs, few people retain much confidence in the more ambitious strategies for world order that had wide backing a generation ago-‘world federalism’, ‘charter review’, and ‘world peace through world law’. The consensus on basic values and willingness to entrust vital interests to community judgment clearly do not exist. One need only picture a world constitutional convention including Messrs. Nixon, Brezhnev, Mao, Brandt, Pompidou, Castro, Peron, and Qaddafi, not to mention Mmes. Golda Meir and Indira Gandhi. What rules or procedures for world government could they agree upon? “(2) Even with this whining admission of defeat, the efforts to build the UN into a bonafide world government continued at a fever pitch. As mankind now enters the second half of the year 2000, the UN is putting the finishing touches on its efforts toward global governance. On September 6, the UN will convene the Millennium Assembly, the largest gathering of heads of state in the history of the world. The goal of the assembly is to achieve consensus among the heads of state concerning the 12 principles of the Charter for Global Democracy:
1. Consolidation of all international agencies under the direct authority of the United Nations.
2. Regulation by the UN of all transnational organizations and financial institutions.
3. Independent source of revenue for the UN such as the ” Tobin Tax” and taxes on aircraft and shipping fuels, licensing the use of the global commons.
4. Eliminate the veto power and the permanent member status on the Security Council.
5. Authorize a standing UN army.
6. Require UN registration of all arms and the reduction of national armies ” as a part of a multilateral global security system” under the authority of the UN.
7. Require individual and national compliance with all UN ” Human Rights” treaties.
8. Activate the International Criminal Court, make the International Court of justice compulsory for all nations, and give individuals the right to petition the courts to remedy social injustice.
9. Create a new institution to establish economic and environmental security by insuring sustainable development.
10.Create a new international environmental court.
11. Adopt a declaration that climate change is an essential global security interest that requires the creation of a ” high-level action team” to allocate carbon emission based on equal per- capita rights.
12. Cancellation of all debt owed by the poorest nations, global poverty reductions, and for ” equitable sharing of global resources” as allocated by the UN.One may quickly observe that these principles are in direct conflict with the principles found in the Constitution of the United States and the Declaration of Independence. There are no guarantees of individual liberties, no protection of minority rights, no protection from global taxation, and certainly no right to bear arms. Furthermore, please take note that the ” 12 Principles” do not include one single mention of freedom. In its place, the word ” security” is substituted. This begs the question: What price will the citizens of the western world (and the US in particular) be willing to pay for security? The globalist UN planners are wagering that these citizens will be willing to squander all that remains of true freedom for this grand illusion of security. In lieu of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, the UN Santa Claus offers this so-called security through the philosophies of ” global governance” and ” sustainable development” . The implementation of these principles will lead to the creation of a massive, socialist bureaucracy that will then legislate pagan ideologies. The culmination of this implementation will be the loss of personal property and freedoms, and those who lose these most cherished possessions will be the very individuals to finance the their own demise. At the same time, a very few will become extremely rich and extremely powerful — all accomplished in the name of democracy.
MILLENNIUM WORLD PEACE SUMMIT
To make matters worse, the Millennium Assembly will be preceded by the Millennium World Peace Summit. This summit, hosted by the UN, is expected to bring 1,000 religious and spiritual leaders together Aug. 28-31. UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan will give the welcoming address at the religious summit, which is intended to investigate ways that the religious leaders can ease tension in areas of conflict. The idea for the gathering emerged from a conversation between Annan and Ted Turner, the multi-millionaire owner of CNN, who has promised to broadcast the proceedings live. Ted Turner reportedly told Annan, “If you want peace in the world you have to bring together religious leaders at the UN and get them to sign a declaration.” (3)
This meeting is not by any means the first of its type. In 1986, the Church of Rome sponsored the Vatican Interfaith Conference, a council of world religions that included Catholics, Protestants, Buddhists, Hindus, Zoroastrians, Native Americans, African Animists, and Aboriginal Snake Worshippers (4). This was an effort to find common ground, common values, and learn tolerance — the building blocks of the One World Religion.
Since 1986, many other groups have begun similar efforts. In 1993, Chicago hosted the Council for a Parliament of the World’s Religions. This meeting generated a proclamation for a Declaration of Human Values, and this declaration included those values common to all religions. (5) The Parliament met again in South Africa in 1999 with similar results. Also in 1993, Rev. William Swing (Episcopal) announced the formation of the United Religions (UR). The UR became fully functional this year, and will serve as a NGO (non-governmental organization) to the UN. One goal of the UR is the establishment of a “Values Bank” that will allow people to invest their money to “promote the values of the UR”. The UR also desires to be a “symbol of unity in a world of disunity” . (6) The UR was officially launched with the signing of its charter 6/29/00. The World Conference of Religion and Peace, organized in 1970, gathered at Melbourne, Australia, in July 1997. This organization stressed “Acceptance, Tolerance, and Collaboration” among all religions EXCEPT those who hold to any form of exclusivity (i.e. . no man cometh to the Father but by me. ) or absolutism (i.e. absolute truth as evidenced by the Word of God). They also endorsed the UR and sought the common values found in all religions. (7) This reoccurring theme of tolerance, cooperation, and common values is echoed by the UN in Our Global Neighborhoodwhen it stated,
SO FROM ITS INCEPTION, THIS ONE WORLD RELIGION IS NOT TOLERANT OR ACCEPTING OF CHRISTIANS, JEWS OR MUSLIMS. IN FACT, THEY HAVE DECLARED FROM THE BEGINNING THAT THESE GROUPS ARE TO BE EXCLUDED!
“We need a set of common, core values around which we can unite people irrespective of their cultural, political, religious, or philosophical backgrounds…” (8)
This era of ecumenism and tolerance is establishing the foundation on which a One World Religion will be built. This One World Religion will then, in turn, be utilized by Antichrist to establish himself as the Messiah of the planet.
STATE OF THE WORLD FORUM
In conjunction with the Millennium Assembly, The State of the World Forum, founded by Mikhail Gorbechev, will meet in New York September 4-10 to seek solutions to all the problems of mankind. The main principles of this group echo those of the UN: “sustainable development” , “global governance” , and the need for a “compassionate society”. The Forum will address “Shaping Globalization: Convening the Community of Stakeholders” and is being pitched as a global town meeting in which the private sector and civil society can come together for substantive dialogue with selected heads of state. The themes highlighted in the forum will include:
- The Social Implications of Globalization
- Accelerating the Impact of information & Biotechnologies
- Global Finance and Capital Flows
- Core Economic Productivity & Sustainability
- Ethical Challenges in Globalization
- Governing Globalization (9)
This gathering of self-professed wise persons is mobilized to solve the problems of the less intelligent members of the species. The State of the World Forum is merely one of the hundreds of NGOs that do the bidding of the UN. By utilizing the multitude of NGOs, the UN is protected from the scrutiny it would receive by an overt exercise of power. This method is just one aspect of “Piece-Meal Functionalism” , developed by Harlan Cleveland of the Aspen Institute of Humanistic Studies. (10) Piecemeal Functionalism evolved as a result of the mistakes of the globalists of the 1950s and 1960s. To again quote the CFR’s Richard Gardner:
” In short, the ‘house of world order’ will have to be built from the bottom up rather than from the top down. It will look like a great ‘booming, buzzing confusion’… sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault…” (11)
Piecemeal Functionalism was then implemented to do just as Gardner recommended. The result will be buzzing confusion — deliberately undetectable. Zbigniew Brezenski, National Security Advisor to President Carter, CFR member and first Director of the Trilateral Commission detailed this principal:
“ Coalitions of specialists can be built across national borders in specific areas, blunting the nationalism that otherwise might hinder agreement“(12)
This strategy has been perfectly implemented in the decades of the 1980s and 1990s with the hundreds of NGOs such as The State of the Word Forum, the UR, the International Green Cross; and many other political, economic, and environmental organizations — all performing the agenda of the UN. This, and the intentional lack of media attention, has allowed the UN to multiply its power without raising much more than an eyebrow. Gardner’s statement was truly prophetic. National sovereignty has, indeed been eroded piece by piece, virtually undetected.
CONCLUSION
Many of the ancient and not-so-ancient prophecies of cataclysm and doom forecasted for the coming of the year 2000 failed to materialize. However, as the Summer of 2000 begins to wane, ominous storm clouds appear upon the horizon. The New World Order is poised to take a giant step toward “global governance” and a consensus among the world’s religions. While the results of the Millennium Assembly and the Millennium Summit may not immediately result in World Government and World Religion, the final pieces of the puzzle are coming into place. In the mean time, the citizens of this great nation are as the proverbial frog in water slowly brought to a boil. Our precious freedoms are teetering precariously on the lip of the global chasm of democracy, and we are too busy with material acquisition to even notice. Worse yet, the system that will be seized and utilized by Antichrist is becoming a reality right under the nose of Christians; but they have been mesmerized by the pleasures of this life and the siren song of unity with those building the One World Religion. Will God give us more time? Will these events be postponed with the triumph of righteousness? Will Christians wake up, reach the lost with the Gospel, and make eternal changes in our world? — OR — Is it too late? Will we pay the price for complacency? The Word of God reveals:
“For yourselves know perfectly that the day of the Lord so cometh as a thief in the night. For when they shall say Peace and safety; then sudden destruction cometh upon them, as travail upon a woman with child; and they shall not escape…” (1 Thessalonians 5:3-4)
The phrase in this passage, “Peace and safety” is very interesting when viewed in the context of UN goals. The UN is certainly seeking for world peace, and is not “safety” a synonym of “security”? Look again at the words of Richard Gardner and the words of the Charter for Global Democracy. The underlying theme of both is “peace and safety” . Is this simply coincidence that the Word of God warns of great destruction when these goals are achieved? Is anything a coincidence with God? Some day, in the not too distant future, there will be “peace and safety” for the entire world. The UN will attain that illusive state that globalists believe will usher in the Utopian Society — Heaven on Earth. However, according to the truth and authority of the Word of God, this will not be Heaven on Earth. Even a Utopian Society apart from God will be judged, and this brief era will end with judgment as the world has never seen. As God warned, ” sudden destruction shall come upon them… and they shall not escape”.
Paul Warburg, on February 17, 1950, while speaking before the United States Senate proclaimed:
“We shall have World Government, whether or not we like it. The only question is whether World Government will be achieved by conquest or consent.” (13)
Millennials, God bless them, many of them are truly acting out of a good heart and sincerely believe what they are doing is right and loving. There are those who don’t really care what is right or true. THEY ARE EQUALLY DECEIVED.
This next article is here to help you get a better understanding of the way they think, or at least the way they are perceived to think or are programmed to think and behave.
Millennials and the Rising Demand for Corporate Social Responsibility
January 20, 2017; by: Kelsey Chong
In a 1970 New York Times Magazine article titled, “The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits,” economist Milton Friedman reiterated the opinion that businesses focused on CSR programs “reveal a suicidal impulse.” [1] By Friedman’s logic, the desperate race to pull in consumers and build up one’s brand name is pitted against social accountability in a zero-sum game.
But contrary to Friedman’s beliefs, many successful businesses are now prioritizing CSR (Corporate Social Responsiblity) more than ever before. CSR reports, or publicly released records of a company’s sustainability blueprint, are taking the business world by storm. [2] With 7,838 CSR reports published worldwide in 2014, CSR reporting showed a sharp 30% rise in popularity over just four years. [3] Furthermore, as of 2016, over 9,000 companies around the world have signed the UN Global Compact – a promise to uphold social responsibility in human rights, labor standards, and environmental protection. [4] [5]
If the profit-based business model still remains unchanged, what could have inspired this sudden shift in attitude?
The Past Success of Traditional Marketing
In the emergence of mass media, branded content was the go-to formula for instant consumer popularity. The basic strategy of branded content was to create fun and engaging material that viewers would associate with one’s brand – thus raising brand recognition. [6] Because the entertainment industry was still severely lacking in diversity and public accessibility, businesses were able to use branded content to establish their brands in mainstream popular culture with almost no competition. [5]
By throwing a few special effects, a catchy tune, or an interesting short story into advertisements, companies could more easily win over amused viewers and bring fame to their brands. [5] In addition to branded content, companies would also sneak their brands into consumers’ minds by regularly sponsoring beloved entertainers, new films, and large-scale public events. [5]
However, these “surefire” traditional marketing strategies suddenly hit a wall with the rise of the millennial generation.
Millennials: A Generation of Opinionated Skeptics
Born into the age of manually filtering through overwhelming amounts of sources and misleading content, millennials are inherently curious and suspicious of information they receive on a daily basis. [7] But above all, constant exposure to ploys and advertisements has made this generation especially skeptical towards marketing. [8] Unlike their predecessors, millennials were born into the digital era, making them accustom to mass media. Therefore, instead of being immediately swayed by brands with entertaining ads, these digital natives are more likely to question companies’ authenticity and true motives behind the bright colors and catchy slogans. [9]
On top of this inherent skepticism, social media platforms like Facebook and Twitter have also led millennials to create content under their own personal “brand,” or online persona. [10] Whether it be through sharing political views in status updates, posting live-tweet reactions, or uploading reaction videos to YouTube, millennials are constantly transmitting their thoughts and opinions into the world. This tech savvy generation simply wants to be heard, and have its voice both contribute to and make a difference in a broader community. [10]
Millennials’ suspicion towards businesses’ motives coupled with a desire to actively make an impact on the world has given birth to a new, overwhelming demand for CSR. Rather than blindly patronizing corporations with unclear intentions and shady operations, millennials strongly favor businesses with transparency and a clear commitment to give back to society. [9] According to a 2015 Cone Communications Millennial CSR Study, “more than 9-in-10 millennials would switch brands to one associated with a cause,” and millennials are “prepared to make personal sacrifices to make an impact on issues they care about, whether that’s paying more for a product, sharing products rather than buying, or taking a pay cut to work for a responsible company.” [11]
“more than 9-in-10 millennials would switch brands to one associated with a cause”
Exceeding 80 million in population, and accounting for about one trillion dollars of total consumer spending in the United States, it’s no wonder that businesses are now scrambling to appease the demands of this up and coming consumer base. [11]
Effective Social Media, Effective CSR Branding
So how exactly can companies show consumers that they are good global citizens? The key lies in the one thing millennials do best: social media.
Just like how a single Facebook post seems to make or break a high schooler’s social reputation, corporate social media similarly functions as a double-edged sword for a brand’s relationship with its customers. If a company uses social media to send out messages to the public, but does not pay attention to followers’ responses, it risks shutting out the consumers’ voices and ignoring any major complaints or problems. [12] Additionally, millennials are also masters of online surveillance – taking note of every mention, like, or tag a brand’s social media page receives. [9] The innate transparency of social media allows participants to access a greater understanding of businesses. If a business slacks on properly maintaining its social media profile, it will soon fall victim to critical millennials who have noticed a lack in response, engagement, and interaction.
However, if used correctly as a two-way communication system, well-maintained social media pages can increase transparency in business operations and help attract loyal millennial customers. Rather than only using social media to talk about promotional information, taking the time to instead listen to what customers are saying and analyzing the demographic of their followers online will allow businesses to learn what kinds of social issues their audience may care about. [5] By consistently advocating for these causes online and opening up honest dialogue with followers on social media, brands can publicly demonstrate both authenticity and their genuine devotion to making the world a better place. [11]
Author – Kelsey Chong
Author – Kelsey ChongSadly, Millenials don’t realize that Organized causes are a ruse. They are fraudulent. These young people are buying the propaganda that these organizations are actually working for the good. It is a total deception. ALL Organizations are controlled by the same entities that are working to enslave them. They don’t care at all about causes.
This next article is part of a series. It is chock full of solid information. I wish I could have included this part of the series in its entirety but there was no room. I know there is a lot to read here. But, it is all relevant and helpful information.
by William F. Jasper
from NewMexicoIndyMedia Websitehttps://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/un_exposed/un_exposed.htm#Contents
Below the surface of public attention, internationalists have been working for decades to build the United Nations into an all-powerful world government.
In this carefully documented study, William F. Jasper shows that, with the United Nations, the American people are being offered what amounts to poison disguised as candy.
From all directions we hear that global problems require global solutions which means, we are told, that America must surrender more authority to the United Nations. Mr. Jasper exposes that power grab, one of the greatest “trust me” schemes in all of history, as totally corrupt.
Behind the humanitarian pretexts, he demonstrates a much more sinister agenda at work.
In The United Nations Exposed, the author offers readers an incredible treasure of understanding of what is happening to America – how and by whom.
But most importantly, Mr. Jasper concludes his expose by explaining how responsible Americans can use an understanding of the threat to preserve freedom.
Part III
Bringing It HomeChapter 12
The UN’s One-World Religion
[T]he Antichrist and the Second Coming of women are synonymous. This Second Coming is not a return of Christ but a new arrival of female presence…. The Second Coming, then, means that the prophetic dimension in the symbol of the Great Goddess … is the key to salvation from servitude….5
— Mary Daly, radical feminist “theologian,” Boston College
Witches were freedom fighters for women because they taught contraception and abortion. The modern contribution is to elevate reproductive freedom to a universal human right….6
— Gloria Steinem, socialist, radical feminist, founder of Ms. magazineOnly a person totally deaf and blind could fail to notice the incredible occult, New Age, and neo-pagan explosion that has been rapidly transforming the Americas and Western Europe into what the advocates of global change gleefully refer to as “post-Christian civilizations.”
A majority of Americans still consider themselves Christian, but find they are increasingly in retreat before a steady onslaught of anti-Christian media assaults, court rulings, attacks from academia, and pop culture offerings. Meanwhile, hedonism, Satanism, witchcraft, astrology, vampirism, homosexuality, Eastern mystic cults, and “Indigenous Peoples” religions are exalted by the same media mandarins and Hollywood elites who control our “news” and “entertainment.”
What very few of these Americans realize is that this hideous “spiritual transformation” is tied directly to the United Nations, where the one-world architects intend to enthrone their planned New World Religion. And as this Satanic enthronement progresses (yes, we mean, literally, Satanic), Christians — and Orthodox Jews and Muslims as well — will find themselves increasingly in the crosshairs of the new world order, singled out as “bigoted,” “dogmatic,” and “intolerant” for insisting on clinging to their “archaic” and “divisive” religious beliefs.
Religious leaders and adherents of all sects are being aggressively evangelized to adopt the UN’s new “global ethic,” a gooey mélange of religious syncretism, environmentalism, socialism, and militant secular humanism. People of all religious backgrounds are being enlisted to embrace this “global ethic” as a “core belief” of their religious faith.
As more and more people adopt this new “planetary consciousness,” the one-world Insiders know that support will grow for:
global disarmament, for both individuals and nations
world government
paganism
environmental extremism
socialism and Communism
religious persecution, in the name of “tolerance” and combating “hate”
If the above statements are shocking and incredible to you, then you are unaware of easily verifiable facts concerning events and developments that are dramatically impacting our society. Many of the steps in this diabolic scheme are taking place before our very eyes, in the open, as British novelist and Fabian Socialist historian H.G. Wells proposed in 1928 in his The Open Conspiracy: Blue Prints For a World Revolution.
Occultt Connections
The global religion envisioned by Wells was a secular, socialist one, but some of his fellow Fabians had migrated from atheism to the occult. Two of the most important pilgrims of that variety were radical feminist Annie Besant and British journalist and newspaper publisher William Stead.
Besant became a fervent disciple of Madame Helena Blavatsky, the occultist, satanist founder of the modern Theosophical movement. Besant eventually became the international president of the Theosophical Society.
Alice and Foster Bailey, who succeeded Annie Besant, unabashedly revealed their demonic sympathies with the launching of Lucifer Publishing Company and its theosophical journal, Lucifer. Later, however, they realized that the Christian West was still too “unenlightened” to accept open Luciferian doctrine and changed the name of Lucifer Publishing Company to the more esoteric (and less likely to offend) Lucis Publishing Company.
They also established the Lucis Trust to serve as the umbrella organization for a profusion of globalist/New Age/occult organizations and programs that are key catalysts of the emerging new world religion. These include the Arcane School, World Goodwill, Triangles, Lucis Publishing, Lucis Productions, Lucis Trust Libraries, and the New Group of World Servers.11
According to the Lucis Trust,
“World Goodwill is recognized … at the United Nations as a Non-governmental Organisation” and is “represented at regular briefing sessions at the United Nations in New York and Geneva.”12
The “regular weekly broadcasts of talks given at World Goodwill Forum meetings and programs produced by Lucis Productions” in London and New York are beamed by Radio For Peace International in English, Spanish, German, and French, on shortwave, to a “worldwide audience” from the UN University for Peace in Costa Rica.13
Lucis Trust also serves as custodian of the Meditation Room at the UN’s New York headquarters.14 This dark and ominous theosophical shrine contains no symbols of the world’s major religions. A barren, metallic altar and a stark, Picassoesque mural of geometric shapes provide spiritual symbolism. Literature provided at the UN describes the symbols as “a rectangular six-ton block of iron ore lit by a single shaft of light and a muted abstract painting at the far end of the small room, similarly illuminated.”15
* Another principal conduit of UN spiritualism is the Temple of Understanding, operated with the support of the Lucis Trust. It is located near the UN at the historic Cathedral of St. John the Divine, a center of political and occult/New Age activism, which also houses the radical Interfaith Center of New York and the Luciferians of the Lindisfarne Center. Launched in the early 1960s as the “spiritual counterpart of the United Nations,” The Temple of Understanding’s founding sponsors included an odd assortment of Establishment Insiders, socialists, humanists, Communist frontiers, religious figures, and entertainment celebrities: Senator John D. Rockefeller IV (CFR, TC); then-Secretary of Defense Robert S. McNamara (CFR, TC); Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger; IBM president Thomas J. Watson (CFR); Socialist Party leader Norman Thomas; Eleanor Roosevelt; Time-Life president James A. Linen (CFR); homosexual author Christopher Isherwood; and Fabian Socialist professor and columnist Max Lerner.19
The Temple of Understanding works closely with the UN Secretariat, the World Council of Churches, the World Conference on Religion and Peace, the UN’s Society for Enlightenment and Transformation, and other “spiritual leaders” to sponsor convocations for “global spirituality.” These conferences, which have burgeoned in size and frequency over the past decade, invariably turn out to be workshops for religious syncretism, which aims at melding and blending the world’s disparate faiths into one global, neo-pagan, occult religion or “Earth Ethic.”
William Stead, publisher of the radical Pall Mall Gazette, was not only a socialist and theosophist — he was also an intimate associate of the super-rich, megalomaniacal, homosexual Cecil Rhodes, whom we discussed in Chapter 3.
Recall that Rhodes, William Stead, and a small group of highborn graduates of Oxford and Cambridge, all fervent apostles of the socialist Professor John Ruskin, formed a “secret society” (the words are Rhodes’) called the “Society of the Elect.” Rhodes admitted that his plan for dominion was “a scheme to take the government of the whole world.”17
In other words, a conspiracy. Envisioning a UN-type world government vested with irresistible military force, Rhodes insisted that the scheme must entail “the foundation of so great a power as to hereafter render wars impossible.”18 It was in the furtherance of this conspiracy that Rhodes’ secret society founded the Royal Institute of International Affairs and CFR.
Both of these front groups, as we have seen, played key roles in establishing the UN, and are likewise involved in building the new global religion.
THIS WAS THE BEGINNING PHASES OF OUR CURRENT EDUCATION/INDOCTRINATION SYSTEM!
Indoctrination: Subordination to the State
Let us drop back for a moment to revisit H.G. Wells. We have noted the continuing influence of his occult, socialist confreres Annie Besant and William Stead from early in the last century to the present day.
But Wells himself is also very much alive in “world order” circles. Quotations from his works are scattered throughout New Age and new world order books and publications. The World Federalist Association (WFA), for instance, continues to publish some of his essays, including “How a Federal World Government May Come About,” taken from his book The Outline of History (1920).20
According to Wells, in that one-world polemic:
The essential task of men of goodwill in all states and countries remains the same, it is an educational task, and its very essence is to bring to the minds of all men everywhere, as a necessary basis for world co-operation, a new telling and interpretation, a common interpretation, of history…. The world perishes unless sovereignty is merged and nationality subordinated.21
Wells sets down what he sees as “the broad fundamentals of the coming world state.”
“It will be based,” he says, “upon a common world religion, very much simplified and universalized…. This will not be Christianity nor Islam nor Buddhism nor any such specialized form of religion, but religion itself pure and undefiled; the Eightfold Way, the Kingdom of Heaven, brotherhood, creative service, and self-forgetfulness. Throughout the world men’s thoughts and motives will be turned by education.… And education, as the new age will conceive it, will go on throughout life.”22
Sound familiar?
This is precisely what we have been experiencing in our schools and colleges, as well as the government-directed “lifelong learning” programs that gradually have become an integral part of so many corporate and governmental jobs. Which is not to imply that we are, or ought to be, opposed to “lifelong learning,” as the term is commonly understood, in its most innocent and benign meaning.
“Tolerance” no longer means “live and let live” civility; it means using the power of government to force majority acceptance of the perverse practices of a militant minority.
“Peacekeeping” means carpet-bombing and/or invading and militarily subjugating whomever the UN has designated as villain du jour.
“Multiculturalism” means demonizing Christian and European civilization for genocide, exploitation, and raping Mother Earth.“Investing” doesn’t mean private individuals freely deciding what to do with their own capital assets; it means politicians and bureaucrats plundering your savings through taxation, and then spending it on socialist boondoggles.
“lifelong learning.” In their lexicon it no longer is an elective; the individual cannot be allowed to determine if and when he will take any continued formal schooling. Such important decisions must be made by superior “experts.” Or as Wells put it, “we should have the collective affairs of the world managed by suitably equipped groups of the most interested, intelligent and devoted people” — such as himself and his fellow Fabians.23
Subversive World Council of Churches One of the early major attempts to co-opt religion in the service of world government came in 1942. Time magazine devoted considerable space in its March 16, 1942 issue to a report on a gathering at Ohio Wesleyan University of hundreds of delegates representing the more than 30 denominations called together by the notoriously pro-Communist Federal Council of Churches (FCC).
The FCC (which later changed its name to the National Council of Churches, NCC) was the American branch of the Communist-controlled World Council of Churches, which still exists and has never ceased its subversive activities.
Chairing the 1942 FCC, Wesleyan confab was Insider John Foster Dulles, a founder of the CFR and, together with his brother Allen Dulles (CFR), a member of the Woodrow Wilson-Colonel House team that tried to foist the League of Nations on the United States. John Dulles would later go on to promote the new world order as Secretary of State under President Eisenhower. However, at the 1942 FCC conference he was lining up church support for the United Nations that would be coming three years later.As Time reported, the Dulles-led conference produced a political program of “extreme internationalism.” Some of the “high spots” of that program were, said Time:
1. Ultimately, “a world government of delegated powers.”
2. Strong immediate limitations on national sovereignty
3. International control of all armies and navies.
4. “A universal system of money….”
5. Progressive elimination of all tariff and quota restrictions on world trade.24According to Time, the conference,
“held that ‘a new order of economic life is both imminent and imperative’ — a new order that is sure to come either ‘through voluntary cooperation … or through explosive political revolution.'”
The Dulles-FCC propaganda parley no doubt greatly assisted the Insiders’ globalist plans, both in building religious support for U.S. entry into the forthcoming United Nations, and in neutralizing opposition to the same organization. In the decades since that confab at Ohio Wesleyan University, UN religious summitry has played an increasingly important part in the one-world transformation scheme.
The World “Peace” Summit
The granddaddy of these convocations, the United Nations Millennium World Peace Summit of Religious and Spiritual Leaders, was held in New York City in late August 2000 (not to be confused with the gathering of Heads of State at the UN’s Millennium Summit, which followed in September). The Peace Summit offered terrifying glimpses of the outrageous and demonic “global spirituality” the Insiders have planned for us.
The outrages began even before the Peace Summit began, when the UN organizers announced that the Dalai Lama would not be invited because his attendance would offend Communist China!27
So, while more than a thousand religious leaders and gurus representing every conceivable “faith tradition” gathered in New York under banners of “tolerance,” “peace,” and “brotherhood,” one of the world’s best-known religious figures, the revered leader of millions of Buddhists, and a man who exemplifies those virtues the UN summit extolled, was barred from attendance — because the totalitarian, genocidal butchers who have been brutally occupying his tiny kingdom of Tibet for half a century would get upset!
The hypocrisy and outrage multiplied as the Summit got underway. Not only was the Dalai Lama excluded, but Red China was given a platform to denounce him and the many other victims of their brutal religious persecution. Representing the Butchers of Beijing at this UN spiritual confabulation was “Bishop” Michael Fu Tieshan of the PRC’s “Patriotic Catholic Church.”28
Most Americans, if they saw or heard any coverage of the Summit in the major CFR-dominated media, were not apprised of the cruel charade that was played out there. Few are aware that Bishop Fu Tieshan is a fraud or that religionists of all types are routinely persecuted in Red China.
CNN certainly wasn’t going to expose this sham; CNN founder and current vice-chairman of CNN parent company Time Warner, Ted Turner, not only was a major financial sponsor of the Summit, but also honorary chairman of the event.
Turner, who is infamous for his profanity, womanizing, and scathing verbal attacks on Christianity, Christian leaders, the Ten Commandments, and Biblical morality, couldn’t resist using the Summit podium to criticize the “very intolerant” Christianity of his boyhood and to propose a more global, all-embracing spirituality for the “one human race.”37
Global Ethic Kung Phooey
The “spirituality” that One-World Ted and his fellow Insiders have in mind is to be found in the UN’s “Declaration of a Global Ethic,” which UNESCO commissioned renegade “theologian” Hans Kung to draft.38 Yes, while real Christian heroes like Cardinal Kung, who suffer torture for their faith, are completely ignored by the CFR “news” cartel, left-wing ideologues like Hans Kung are celebrated.
For those who like their theology dished up from the likes of Ted Turner and Bishop Fu Tieshan — which appears to be most of the globalist folk who populate the UN diplomatic corps and delegations to UN conferences — Hans Kung was a perfect choice.
In his 1991 book Global Responsibility: In Search of a New World Ethic, Kung declared:
Any form of… church conservatism is to be rejected…. To put it bluntly: No regressive or repressive religion — whether Christian, Islamic, Jewish or of whatever provenance — has a long-term future.39
So we see that from its inception the UN World Church is not to allow Christians, Jews Or Muslims. So much for acceptance and tolerance. All who believe in ONE TRUE GOD… will not be tolerated in the New World Order.
Moreover, he said:
“If ethics is to function for the well-being of all, it must be indivisible. The undivided world increasingly needs an undivided ethic. Postmodern men and women need common values, goals, ideals, visions.”40
That’s right, UN “diversity” is broad enough to embrace every imaginable navel-gazing mystic, diapered swami, saffron-robed guru, befeathered sachem, spell-chanting shaman, New Age psycho-babbler, tree-worshiping pantheist, witch, warlock, druid, animist, or Marxian spiritualist — but not those terrible, monotheistic creeds. Mustn’t tolerate any of those “dogmatic,” “absolutist” faiths; of that the “tolerant” globalists are dogmatically, absolutely certain.
Another prominent “theologian” of the UN’s “global ethic” is Dr. Robert Muller (whom we introduced in our Prologue). A former UN Assistant Secretary-General, Dr. Muller served 38 years as a United Nations “civil servant,” and — following his retirement in 1985 — has served as chancellor of the UN’s University for Peace in Costa Rica. He is the author of the World Core Curriculum now in use in schools worldwide.
In his influential book New Genesis: Shaping a Global Spirituality, Muller opines:
“If Christ came back to earth, his first visit would be to the United Nations to see if his dream of human oneness and brotherhood had come true. He would be happy to see representatives of all nations.”41
…We remind you, dear reader, that in the contorted theosophical sophistry of Muller and company, “Christ” is not Jesus Christ but Lucifer. According to Muller, the UN’s wondrous endeavors are leading us on a “grand journey of humanity towards oneness, convergence and unprecedented happiness.”
What’s more,
“We were approaching Teilhard’s point of convergence, Wells’ last chapter of The Outline of History … Sri Chinmoy’s world oneness … the apotheosis [deification] of human life on earth.”42
“Spiritual Leaders” for the New Millennium It was Master Chinmoy, appropriately, who presented the UN’s U Thant Peace Award to Maurice Strong, the globe-trotting billionaire best known for his role as Secretary-General of the 1992 UN Earth Summit in Brazil.44 Strong was receiving the honor, said Chinmoy, for “his lifelong commitment to the soaring ideals of the United Nations.”
The award was named for U Thant, the Burmese Marxist who served as the UN’s third Secretary-General and who, in 1970, brazenly declared:
“Lenin was a man with a mind of great clarity and incisiveness.”45
Maurice Strong, who apparently shares Lenin’s “great clarity and incisiveness,” has been a driving force in bringing the most extreme enviro-Leninism and far-out reli-gio-Leninism into the social, political, economic, religious mainstream.
Earth Charter Subversion and Perversion
Comrade Gorbachev knows something about the Earth Charter, since he helped compose it. It was his good friend, Maurice Strong, as chief of the Earth Summit, who commissioned him to take up the important task. While much of the Charter sounds like harmless eco-babble, or even sensible earth stewardship that is compatible with Christian theology, it is larded with deceptive code words and traps aimed at destroying Judeo-Christian moral values and the non-socialist political-economic systems.
Article 12 (a) of the Earth Charter commits signatory governments to:
Eliminate discrimination in all its forms, such as that based on race, color, sex, sexual orientation, religion, language, and national, ethnic or social origin.52
This is very clearly aimed at expanding the socialist state into all spheres of life and especially to undermine the legal codes of nations based upon the moral precepts of the monotheistic religions, all of which proscribe homosexuality. The Charter, like the many “human rights” conventions it promotes, seeks to give homosexual activists a pretext to claim legal footing to challenge in the courts and legislatures national, state, and local laws against sexual perversion.
This is already happening. The first case we are aware of was launched in 1992 when Nick Toonen, a homosexual rights activist in Australia, asked the UN Human Rights Committee to investigate the state of Tasmania’s anti-homosexuality statute. The UN committee determined that Toonen could be classified as a “victim.”53
Similarly, here in the United States, militant sodomites have charged that they are “victims” of human rights violations because of our laws against homosexual practices and have taken their cause to the United Nations. If we allow current trends to continue, we most certainly will see a federal court in the near future rule that U.S. state laws concerning sodomy must be struck down to comply with UN “human rights” law.
Christian-Marxist “Unity*’ Following the conclusion of the State of the World Forum 2000 (September 4th-10th) in New York, Mr. Gorbachev was off on a multi-week evangelistic crusade that took him to some surprising venues. He was received with apparent enthusiasm at churches in Florida and Tennessee.
Then it was off to Salt Lake City, where Gorby addressed Franklin Covey’s International Symposium at the Salt Palace.*
*Thanks to a celebrity status that has been bestowed on him by the Insiders, Gorbachev is received like a rock star by politicians, journalists, business and religious leaders, educators, and entertainers worldwide. He is, reportedly, the highest-paid name for hire in the world, commanding $100,000 for a half-hour talk. Gunter Kunkel, president of the Phoenix Club in Anaheim, California, felt his group had gotten a “bargain” because they only had to pay $75,000 for 50 minutes of the Gorbachev wisdom and charm. “Can you think of anybody bigger?” the awestruck Kunkel asked the Los Angeles Times’ Mike Anton. “It will probably be the greatest night we have seen here.”58 Prior to the Millennium Summit, Gorbachev scored one of his biggest coups to date, when, on June 27, 2000, he was given a place of honor between Cardinals Sodano and Silvestrini at a Vatican press conference in Rome.59
At a Salt Lake City press conference, the Nobel Prize winner lamented to the assembled media corps that “we do not have a new world order, the kind of new world order that we need.” 54
Later, in California, he shared a stage with William “Star Trek” Shatner, before beaming his “global ethic” sermonette to a global television audience from the Reverend Robert Schuller’s famous Crystal Cathedral. “I know that he calls himself an atheist,” Rev. Schuller said, but Schuller believed, nonetheless, that God had used Gorbachev “in a mighty way.”
And he hoped that one day the former Communist dictator would become “a man of faith.”55
We join Rev. Schuller in that hope, as we hope that all atheists will become “men of faith” — as that term has been understood traditionally by believers. But, in the meantime, is there any justification for Christians to turn over their pulpits to atheists — to enemies of God — like Gorbachev? Comrade Gorbachev, after all, is a “man of faith”: He believes in the gospels of Marx and Lenin.
To anyone familiar with Communist dialectical materialism as it concerns religion, Gorbachev’s fixation with religion over the past decade makes perfect sense. He is one of the leading global activists working to transform Christianity, to unite it with Marxism! As a master dialectician, he is expert in the use of words as weapons, particularly in using words that will appeal to and disarm Christians.
Gorbachev is following precisely the Leninist dialectical line that was spelled out by Li Wei Han of the Central Committee of the Chinese Communist Party in 1959, in instructions sent to Fidel Castro’s new Communist regime.
According to Comrade Li:
The line of action to follow against the Church is to instruct, to educate, to persuade, to convince, and, gradually, to awaken and fully develop the political conscience of Catholics by getting them to take part in study circles and political activities. By means of these activities, we must undertake the dialectical struggle within religion. Gradually, we will replace the religious element with the Marxist element.61
More importantly, it is a simple matter to observe them in action. These same instructions form the basis of the “Liberation Theology” revolution that was launched from Cuba into Latin America and North America in the 1960s and is operating throughout the world today. These instructions form the basis of the Soviet push (under Gorbachev) for development of the new “global spirituality.”
While Christian leaders naively praise the new “openness” to religion in Communist countries, Leninists like Gorbachev know this is only a temporary, tactical “one step back.” There is no question that the Leninists — with the aid of foolish Christians, as well as agents posing as Christians — are “[replacing] the religious element with the Marxist element.”
This is the same subversive dialectic that permeates Gorbachev’s annual State of the World Forums63 as well as all of the UN’s “spiritual” confabulations. When the leaders of these events aren’t directly “replacing the religious element with the Marxist element,” they are fast at work replacing the Christian element with various pagan and New Age elements, which they recognize as far more flexible and conducive to their Marxist one-world schemes than what they scornfully denounce as “dogmatic,” “rigid,” and “sectarian.”
Christianity’s Epitaph? Where is this leading? It is worthwhile noting what the militant paganists themselves say about this. In the Fall 1995 issue of the occult journal Gnosis we find a very sobering report entitled “State of the Hidden Arts: An Overview of Esotericism Today,” which offers analyses by a variety of pagan activists.64
Christopher Bamford, head of Lindisfarne Press, exults that the last 10 years,
Gnosis also trumpeted the exultant reports of Diane Conn Darling regarding the rise of neo-paganism, which is busy “building interfaith relations with mainstream religious groups.”
One major achievement in this effort, the not-so-darling Ms. Darling reported, occurred when,
“several major Neopagan groups were represented at the 1993 World Parliament of Religions in Chicago. Our presentations were heavily attended, including a beautiful Full Moon Circle celebrated in a nearby park…. Pagan priestess Deborah Light and the Fellowship of Isis (the world’s largest Pagan organization) are signatories on our behalf to the Declaration of [a] Global Ethic….”66
Darling glowingly remarked that “polytheism is nearly universal in neopaganism.” As is pantheism. According to Ms. Darling:
“Neopagans see the God/dess in all things: in each other, in persons following different paths, in animals, plants, planets, rivers, rocks, and in ourselves…. The Neopagan mythos gives rise to an ethos grounded in the Earth. Indeed, for a great many Neopagans, the Great Goddess is the living Earth herself.”67
These denizens of darkness, when speaking amongst themselves, are jubilant because they are positive that they are riding a cosmic neopagan wave that will soon overwhelm what they see as a crumbling, dying Christianity.
Darkness Clothed in Light Having closely followed the UN for more than two decades as a journalist and researcher, and having attended UN Summits from Rio to San Francisco to Rome to New York, it is clear to this writer that the neo-pagan one-Worlders at the UN Tower of Babel are accelerating the tempo of their program of spiritual subversion, even as they become more swollen with arrogance. The Rio Earth Summit was a watershed event, very powerfully and publicly wedding the UN to the New Age, one-world, neo-pagan “worldview.”
In his opening address to the UNCED (Earth Summit) plenary session, Maurice Strong directed the world’s attention to the Declaration of the Sacred Earth Gathering, which was part of the pre-Summit ceremonies.
“[T]he changes in behavior and direction called for here,” said Strong, “must be rooted in our deepest spiritual, moral and ethical values.”68
According to the declaration, the ecological crisis,
“transcends all national, religious, cultural, social, political, and economic boundaries…. The responsibility of each human being today is to choose between the force of darkness and the force of light. We must therefore transform our attitudes and values, and adopt a renewed respect for the superior law of Divine Nature.” 69
However, in the twisted theosophic theology of Maurice Strong, Robert Muller, Sri Chinmoy, and other occultists who dominate the United Nations, “light” is darkness and “darkness” is light. Their “light” comes not from Jesus Christ (“I am the Light of the world,” John 8:12), but from Lucifer, “the Light bearer.” The Earth Summit was a non-stop orgy of pagan, Gaia-worshiping ceremonies, rituals, sermons, eulogies, declarations, manifestos, and celebrations. It not only marked the introduction of the radical NGO legions as an emerging superpower, but brought the occult nature of the UN out in the open.
Not entirely into the open, however. The controlled U.S. media never gave the American public at large an accurate view of this clamorous chorus. Most frequently, the media presented them as noble, if sometimes eccentric, idealists. The viewing and reading public had no way of knowing the extent and depth of the specifically and rabidly anti-American, anti-Christian animus of the vast majority of the official delegates and NGO radicals.
Nor were they made aware of the overtly pagan and communistic emphasis of the entire Earth Summit program and the conventions, declarations, and treaties that came out of it.
American television viewers did not see the ubiquitous Communist flags, posters, and graffiti that festooned the NGO’s Global Forum at Rio’s Flamengo Park. Nor did they see the even more plentiful pagan, occult, and Wicca symbols, exhibits, seminars, and programs that could not be avoided at the Summit. They did not see the incredibly gross homosexual pornography display that was allowed to daily assault the eyes of thousands of Brazilian families who visited Flamengo Park. This Ford Foundationfunded70 exhibit of life-size photographs would have been illegal in most cities in America, but it was a welcome addition at the UN celebration.
Quite the opposite of the image of peace, brotherhood, and tolerance presented by the U.S. media, the Earth Summiteers were almost universally venomous, foul, blasphemous, and profane in their constant verbal attacks on the United States, the middle class, capitalism, technology, Christianity, and Christian leaders viciously attacking Dr. James Dobson, Rev. Jerry Falwell, and most especially Pope John Paul II.
Having sat amongst the NGO leaders and cadres in their strategy sessions, and having interviewed, dined with, and mingled with top UN officials and delegates at UN venues around the world, I cannot help but arrive at the conclusion that these “peace people,” these “civil servants” and self-appointed representatives of “global civil society,” are the most pathetic and concentrated collection of pompous, privileged, pampered, hateful, tyrannical, hypocritical, morally revolting specimens of humanity one is likely ever to encounter.
Even more outrageous than the behavior of these miscreants, however, are the arguments of elected American officials that we must continue participating in and supporting this dangerous charade. The UN is elevating, legitimizing, and popularizing all of the demonic influences that are pushing our civilization into the dark abyss.
The average American has become so inured to the neo-pagan influences that are saturating our culture that he is apt to simply shrug his shoulders at each new offense, and figure there is nothing that can be done. It’s all just part of our inevitable, downward moral spiral, he sadly reasons. But there is something that can be done about this. The American taxpayers and voters have it within their power to change that.
We will explain that in detail in our final chapter.
United Nations Human Rights Council – ExposedMarch 21, 2012
The Human Rights Council (HRC), on the one hand, and human rights on the other hand, constitutes an oxymoron. The HRC – elected by the majority of the UN members – constitutes an authentic reflection of the UN.
On Friday, the HRC will conclude a month long deliberation by submitting four more resolutions condemning Israel.
The HRC heard testimony from a representative of the Assad regime, in formulating one of the resolutions, which denounces Israel for, alleged, violations of human rights on the Golan Heights. At the same time, the Assad regime has already murdered 8,000 Syrian dissidents and rebels, causing tens of thousands of refugees, some seeking asylum in Israel’s Golan Heights.
The HRC was privy to testimonies from Palestinian representatives, while an increasing number of Palestinians attempt to relocate to Jerusalem, in order to avoid the ruthless rule of the Palestinian Authority. The HRC never discussed intra-Palestinian violence, which has caused substantially more fatalities than those produced during Israel’s confrontation with Palestinian terrorism. It failed to act against the PLO/Hamas-led hate-education, brainwashing Palestinian children to become suicide bombers; rewarding Palestinian mothers for raising suicide bombers; executing rival Palestinians by throwing them off high-rise buildings; spraying them with bullets from the waist down; torturing, maiming and executing Palestinian opponents; abusing Palestinian civilians as human shields; physically abusing critical Palestinian journalists; suppressing Palestinian civil liberties; and systematically and deliberately targeting Israeli civilians for terrorism, missile launching and mortar shelling.
The HRC welcomed a report by Professor Richard Falk – who accused the US Administration for complicity and cover up in the September 11terrorism – on “the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territories occupied since 1967.” Prof. Falk – a Hamas sympathizer, justifying suicide bombing as a legitimate struggle – was appointed in 2008 to a six-year term as UN Special Rapporteur. Falk succeeded Professor John Dugard, who shares his worldview.
The HRC is assisted by an advisory committee, chaired by Morocco’s Halima Warzazi, who, in 1988, blocked a UN initiative to condemn Saddam Hussein’s chemical warfare against Iraq’s Kurds. The vice-chair is Switzerland’s Jean Ziegler, who co-established the “Qaddafi International Prize for Human Rights” and authored books accusing the USA of being responsible for global malaise. Another advisor is Nicaragua’s Miguel D’Escoto Brockman, former President of the UN General Assembly, an admirer of Ahmadinejad, a defender of Omar al-Bashir, Sudan’s president indicted by the International Criminal Court for crimes against humanity, a friend of Fidel Castro and self-hating Americans such as Ramsey Clark and Noam Chomsky.
Since June 2007, Israel has been the only country to be listed on the HRC’s permanent agenda. Out of the ten permanent items on the HRC agenda, eight are organizational and procedural, one deals with global human rights and “item seven” – “the human rights situation in Palestine and other occupied Arab territories” – is the only one that is country-specific. The outcome of the investigation is prejudged, not subject to review. Israel – the only Middle Eastern democracy – is the only UN member to be ostracized annually, while its enemies are exempt from scrutiny.
According to former US Ambassador to the UN, John Bolton, “there are permanent members of the Security Council and non-permanent members, but Israel is the only permanent non-member.”
80% of all 2010 UN resolutions criticizing specific countries for human rights violations were directed at Israel. Only six other UN members faced human rights criticism at all, one of which was the United States. The HRC subjected the USA to harsh criticism – by Venezuela, Cuba, North Korea, Iran and Russia – for, supposed, human rights violations. The HRC criticized the elimination of Bin-Laden and Israel’s defense against PLO, Hamas and Hezbollah terrorists.
Simultaneously, the HRC has ignored Islamic terrorism, which has afflicted Asia, Africa, Europe and the USA. No emergency sessions and inquiries were held and no resolutions were adopted
55% of the HRC members are Muslim countries, which contribute little to the UN budget, but dominate policy-making. The HRC is formally the guardian of human rights, but its members – e.g., Libya, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Cuba, China, Kyrgyzstan, Uganda, Djibouti, Senegal, Mauritania, Malaysia, Russia and China – deny their peoples fundamental civil liberties.
In view of the track record of the UN in general, and the HRC in particular, and in light of the intensifying threat of Islamic terrorism, the Free World should grow independent of the UN, militarily and policy-wise. The Free World should heed Ambassador Bolton’s assessment that “the UN was marginal during the Cold War, and is well on its way to marginalizing itself when it comes to the world’s greatest threat, terrorism.”
BY: Yoram Ettinger http://www.israelhayom.com/site/newsletter_opinion.php?id=1594
spacer
United Nations No Defender of Muslim Women’s Rights
Monday, 19 February 2018
UN Exposed as Haven for Child Rapists; More Scandals Coming
Written by Alex Newman
After decades of United Nations “peacekeeping” troops and officials raping women and children all over the world with complete impunity and even “diplomatic immunity,” a chorus of global outrage and media attention is reaching epic proportions. A handful of predators are now facing justice. But the tsunami of public fury comes as widely reported estimates suggest some 60,000 victims have been raped and sexually abused by UN officials over just the last decade — with almost nobody punished but the victims and whistleblowers.Still, the wheels of justice are turning, slowly but surely. Just this week, the top “children’s rights” chief at the disgraced UN “children” agency UNICEF admitted to raping a 12-year-old boy — after the same agency was caught running a child pornography studio in its basement in Belgium using African children it procured. That UN child rapist was sentenced to prison this week. But former UN officials have said that the revelations so far are just the “tip of the iceberg.”
The escalating pedophilia and sex abuse scandals engulfing the UN and its “peacekeeping” forces have become so massive that even the pro-UN media, including the notoriously globalist CNN and The Guardian, have been forced to cover it. Indeed, all over the world, the UN is making headlines for raping and exploiting children — not to mention sexual abuse and harassment of the UN’s own employees. Various “aid” groups funded by taxpayers are in the crosshairs, too.
As the scandals grow, the UN formally announced — for the first time ever — that it would not claim “diplomatic immunity” to protect the estimated 3,300 pedophiles working for the global organization. So far, though, virtually none of the UN troops involved in the widespread rape of children have been held criminally accountable. In fact, those who tried to stop the pedophile rapists were viciously persecuted while the predators continued their horrific abuses.
Meanwhile, as the UN faces global criticism for the abuse, the UN “education” agency known as UNESCO has just sparked controversy by releasing radical new “Comprehensive Sexuality Education” standards for humanity. Among other concerns, critics suggested the radical indoctrination program, which begins by normalizing the “LGBT” agenda and promoting “sexual pleasure” at age five, would help sexualize and “groom” young children, facilitating sexual abuse. UNICEF and other agencies repeatedly caught in pedophilia scandals were also involved in the new sex standards that critics say facilitate exploitation and abuse of children.
Aside from the UN itself, a number of globalist and leftist “non-governmental organizations” that purport to fight for “children” are also ensnared in growing child-rape scandals. So far, tax-funded Oxfam, the radical left-wing outfit that shills for globalism and statism, has taken center stage, with some of its top executives implicated in organizing or covering up orgies with local victims in Haiti, including allegations that some of the girls coerced into the bizarre “sex parties” were children. The scandal reportedly goes all the way to the top.
Among the explosive stories coming out is one that just hit the headlines this week. Former UNICEF “child rights” campaigner Peter Newell, who led the global effort to jail parents who spank their children as a disciplinary measure, was sentenced to six years in a British prison for raping a young boy, who was just 12 when the predatory UN official began raping him. The “horrific” abuse was perpetrated by Newell while he worked for the UN drawing up the guidelines for the totalitarian “UN Convention on the Rights of the Child,” a global scheme that sidelines parents and parental rights — thereby facilitating abuse of children by predators. The U.S. government has not joined the UN CRC.
And Newell-style abuse of children by UN officials is systemic, experts say — UN officials were even caught running a child porn studio in UNESCO’s basement forcing children to engage in sex acts for the cameras. “There are tens of thousands of aid workers around the world with pedophile tendencies, but if you wear a UNICEF T-shirt nobody will ask what you’re up to,” said attorney and professor Andrew MacLeod, former chief of operations of the UN’s Emergency Coordination Center who became an anti-sex abuse campaigner after realizing the enormity of the problem. “You have the impunity to do whatever you want. It is endemic across the aid industry across the world.”
Citing UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres’ own figures released last year, MacLeod and a group of campaigners known as “Hear Their Cries” estimated that there have been 60,000 victims of UN sex abuse just in the last decade. They also estimate that the UN currently employees some 3,300 pedophiles, many of whom have access to children and “diplomatic immunity” to shield them from justice.
Other former UN employees-turned-whistleblowers have cited the culture at the UN as one of the reasons for the horrors. Speaking of “predatory pedophiles” in the so-called “aid” world who abuse children with impunity, former UN official Rasna Warah explained that “the culture of silence allows such wrongdoing to continue.” Warah, who wrote the book UNSilenced: UNmasking the United Nations’ Culture of Cover-ups, Corruption and Impunity, said that this impunity was likely to continue at the UN — especially if the predators in question are senior UN officials.
“When in 2005, the UN established an Ethics Office, staff members believed that they could report criminal or unethical behaviour confidentially without being punished,” said Warah, who also suffered retaliation for trying to blow the whistle on UN corruption. “However, the UN Ethics Office has proved to be a channel through which wrongdoing is covered up. Very few staff members who have approached the office for help have obtained justice; on the contrary, many have been forced to resign or been fired.” To deal with the impunity, Warah wrote in her column at Kenya’s The Daily Nation newspaper that officials of donor countries should consider withdrawing funds for UN agencies.
The problem of impunity and persecuting whistleblowers at the UN is well documented. When UN insiders have attempted to expose even horrifying abuses such as widespread child rape by the UN and its “peace” armies, the whistleblowers have typically faced persecution by UN leaders, while the perpetrators are generally protected at all costs. Anders Kompass, for example, the former UN human rights worker who tried to stop child rape in Africa by “peace” troops there, faced extreme retaliation for doing the right thing. After the persecution, he even wondered publicly whether ethics could ever return to the UN. He concluded that the answer was probably no.
Top officials are implicated, too. The UN “High Commissioner for Human Rights,” Islamic prince and anti-freedom zealot Zeid Ra’ad al Hussein, was a key figure who orchestrated the persecution of Kompass and other whistleblowers. Hussein oversaw a vicious campaign of retaliation and abuse waged against his own officials such as Kompass, who blew the whistle on the rape of children by “peace” troops in Africa. He also persecuted whistleblowers who exposed UN agencies sending sensitive technology to North Korea and another which helped Beijing target human rights activists.
Even UN employees are not immune from the predators in the UN — and that is according to even left-wing globalist publications that love the UN and normally shield it from bad press. “The United Nations has allowed sexual harassment and assault to flourish in its offices around the world, with accusers ignored and perpetrators free to act with impunity,” the far-left U.K. Guardian reported last month. “Dozens of current and former UN employees described a culture of silence across the organization and a flawed grievance system that is stacked against victims.” When victims report the rapes or abuse, they get fired.
While U.S. lawmakers have been suspiciously quiet about the horrifying abuse they continue to fund with American tax dollars, British politicians are turning up the heat. Senior Conservative (Tory) Member of Parliament Conor Burns, who serves as Foreign Minister Boris Johnson’s parliamentary aide, suggested that what has emerged thus far is just “the tip of an iceberg in finding out what has been going on.” “I believe that there has been systematic, organised and covered-up activity going on over many, many years,” said Burns, who said MacLeod needed to be taken very seriously.
Other British lawmakers and even Prime Minister Theresa May have suggested that the United Kingdom would withhold funds from the UN until it dealt with the wave of sex abuse and pedophilia. A handful of U.S. lawmakers have also threatened to defund the UN’s predatory UN “peace” troops, but so far, the massive U.S. funding continues to flow. Trump’s latest budget proposal cuts the funding somewhat — with disgraced agencies such as UNICEF being cut off entirely — but U.S. taxpayers would still be the largest financiers of the dictators club and its horrific crime spree.
Unfortunately, the evil now being exposed at the UN was hardly surprising to seasoned observers of the UN. In fact, as this publication and others have documented extensively, the problem is systemic. Everywhere UN troops go — Africa, Europe, Asia, the Americas — they have been exposed raping children, killing civilians, abusing power, and more. In one town in the Ivory Coast where a survey was done, eight out of ten underage girls admitted to being routinely raped and exploited by UN troops. In that same country, the UN and UN-backed jihadist militias who butchered thousands of Christians with machetes violently removed the elected Christian presidentand put a totalitarian Islamic central banker in his place.
Even without knowing the ghastly history of UN abuses, it should be no surprise that so much evil inhabits the halls of the dictators club. And it is clear that “reform” is beyond useless. The UN was in fact birthed from a poison seed — it’s first Secretary-General, American Alger Hiss, who played a lead role creating the UN, was eventually convicted for serving as a spy of mass-murdering Soviet dictator Joseph Stalin, one of history’s most savage and murderous tyrants. Since then, the UN has waged practically perpetual war on national sovereignty, self-government, morality, and freedom.
Related articles: MOST OF THE ARTICLES ARE POBABLY CENSORED. I left them here so you can see that they once existed.
Why Is the UN Protecting Child Rapists?
Thousands of Sex Abuse Claims Against UN “Peace” Troops
UNsilenced: Whistleblower Exposes UN Culture of Corruption
UN “Sex Education” Standards Push LGBT Agenda on 5-Year-Olds
UN Child-abuse Whistleblower Skeptical That Ethics Can Return to UN
Citing Officials’ “Impunity” on Child Sex Abuse, UN Whistleblower Quits
Whistleblower Targeted for Exposing UN Troops Raping Children
Congress Threatens Funding for Child-raping UN “Peace” Troops
Silly Puppet Hammers UN on Serious Child Sex Abuse Scandals
UN Panics Amid Growing Scandal on Child Rape by “Peace” Troops
UN “Peace” Forces in Haiti Prey on Civilians, Children
CFR: To Deal With Child-raping UN Troops, UN Needs More Power
Sex Abuse by UN “Peace” Troops Becoming Global Scandal
UN-backed Forces Slaughter Christians in Ivory Coast
UN Troops Accused of Sex Crimes Worldwide
United Nations Exploits Pseudo-“Human Rights” to Attack U.S.
Ruthless Tyrants Win Seats on UN “Human Rights” Council
UN LGBT Czar on Indoctrinating Children: “The Younger the Better”
United Nations Exploits Pseudo-“Human Rights” to Attack U.S.
U.S. Independence Attacked as Never Before by UN Interdependence
Nelson Mandela’s passing focused the world on his great achievements, while ignoring the increased sexual violence during the period of his leadership in South Africa, a country often described as the “rape capital of the world.” Violence against women is rife in other African states and the mislabeled Arab Spring swept in much abuse. As custodian of the world’s moral high ground, the United Nations could do more to tackle this scourge, particularly in some Muslim societies.
The recent international global campaign, “16 Days of Activism Against Gender Violence,” called for groups and individuals to focus on militarism and gender-based violence. However, the campaign fell short as it failed to highlight Islamist violence against women associated with the Arab Spring uprisings and the radical militias that have terrorized women in Libya, Tunisia, and Yemen.
A recent report found that the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood’s Justice and Freedom Party (FJP) tended to blame victims for the sexual harassment they suffered, and were probably behind mob attacks on women during the street protests that followed the party’s election to power. The FJP also encouraged Female Genital Mutilation as a religious obligation.
In Morocco, where sexual violence reportedly affects 40 percent of 18 to 24 year old women, a long anticipated bill to criminalize violence is being evaluated. The Islamist government excluded women from the drafting process but under pressure from activists, they have been forced to create a review committee.
Women are targets of violent Islamists in Nigeria and northern Mali, despite French military intervention in the latter. Rape and forced marriage are commonplace, and stoning and public whipping for sex outside marriage is enforced as part of an extremist version of Islamic Sharia law.
The Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) did not focus on Islamist mistreatment of women in the “16 Days of Activism” campaign, and also overlooked persecution of female apostates, Christians, Kurds and Baha’is.
Voting patterns in the UN are unlikely to support Muslim women’s rights. The influential Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), a 57-member UN voting bloc, has previously supported criminalizing insults to religion in order to avoid criticism of Islam. It would be understandable if they ignored a campaign against Islamist oppression of women.
Moreover, such a drive might be unacceptable to some OIC member states that have registered reservations to the UN Convention on the Elimination of Discrimination from Women (CEDAW), because some of the articles conflict with Sharia.
Many Muslim majority countries reject the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR). Instead, they acknowledge the Cairo Declaration on Human Rights in Islam, which is grounded in Sharia. Yet they see no conflict in their membership of the UN Human Rights Council, which is based on the UDHR, and where they tend to vote en bloc and defend each other against criticism.
Defenders of women’s rights have been thwarted by the U.S. Administration’s disregard of reformers, and backing for the Islamist Muslim Brotherhood, despite Egypt and Tunisia deposing their Brotherhood affiliated governments.
Women’s rights were also hindered in the UN when Iran was elected to the UN Commission on the Status of Women (CSW), and Islamist Sudan was nominated to join the UN Human Rights Council and the Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC), which elects members of CSW.
Although the UN does important humanitarian work, it is overgrown with the weeds of a dysfunctional bureaucracy and spineless leadership, and has become a watering hole for states that are prepared to sanction sex discrimination and extremist ideology without fear of serious challenge by the world body.
The Arab Human Development Report 2005 offered guidance regarding Muslim women’s rights, noting that “an Arab renaissance cannot be accomplished without the rise of women… Directly and indirectly, it concerns the well-being of the entire Arab world.” The Report also encouraged Arab states to remove all reservations incompatible with international treaty law, in particular CEDAW, and to cease using the pretext that CEDAW is contrary to national law.
The UN has significant political capital, and a mandate to take moral, not merely consensus positions on human rights in general, and women’s rights in particular. By persistently sidestepping Islamist misogyny, the world body is discredited as a travesty of the universal values it claims to uphold.
Can two walk together, except they be agreed? (Amos 3:3)
About
Founded in 1948 the World Council of Churches (WCC), is an international, interdenominational fellowship of Christian churches that was proclaimed “a fellowship of churches which accept our Lord Jesus Christ as God and Saviour” at the 1948 inaugural assembly [01]. Based in the Ecumenical Centre in Geneva, Switzerland, they are made up of some “350 member churches who together represent more than half a billion Christians around the world.”WCC member churches can be found in all regions of the world and include most of the world’s Orthodox churches (Eastern and Oriental), as well as African Instituted, Anglican, Assyrian, Baptist, Evangelical, Lutheran, Mennonite, Methodist, Moravian, Old-Catholic, Pentecostal, Reformed, United/Uniting and Free/Independent churches, Disciples of Christ and Friends (Quakers) [02]
The Encyclopedia Britannica says “The WCC is not a church, nor does it issue orders or directions to the churches. It works for the unity and renewal of the Christian denominations and offers them a forum in which they may work together in the spirit of tolerance and mutual understanding. [03]
And, in their own words, (Emphasis added)
All WCC programmes aim to support the member churches and ecumenical partners to journey together, promoting justice and peace in our world as an expression of faith in the Triune God. [04]
The Reality
However, in reality the WCC seems to be miles removed from “a fellowship of Churches which accept Jesus Christ our Lord as God and Saviour” with the mission of “promoting justice and peace in our world as an expression of faith in the Triune God”.According to the Gatestone Institute, a non-partisan, not-for-profit, international policy council and think tank, “after the retirement of its founding spirit, Willem Visser’t Hooft, it drifted away from its original concerns, a development that accelerated after his death in 1985.” [05]
In fact, according to an article by Dr. M. H. Reynolds entitled The World Council Of Churches – An Ecumenical Tower Of Babel says their “doctrinal basis” is meaningless because as an official WCC document goes on to explain
“Since the World Council of Churches is not itself a church it passes no judgment upon the sincerity with which member churches accept the basis.” Document 24 (Appendix 111) of the WCC Central Committee Meeting of August 22-29, 1973, specifically states: “The World Council of Churches has no common confession. It is a fellowship of churches confessing Jesus Christ each in its own way.”
I would suggest reading the article in its entirety HERE
The truth is that the WCC tolerates an enormous number of heretical beliefs – the ordination of women and practicing homosexuals just the tip of the iceberg. (This reminds me of Jesus’ words “Why do you call Me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ and do not do what I say? (Luke 6:46)
The 1993 Re-Imagining Conference
Attended by some 2,000 women “seeking to change Christianity”, the Re-imaging conference in Minneapolis, Minnesota was sponsored by the World Council of Churches growing out of their Decade of Solidarity with WomenSponsoring and participating denominations included the United Methodist Church, United Presbyterian Church, Evangelical Lutheran Church in America, United Church of Christ, United Church of Canada, Church of the Brethren, American Baptist Convention, Episcopalian, and Mennonite. There were also 234 Roman Catholic participants.
Speakers included Chung Hyun Kyung, Korean “theologian” who equates the Holy Spirit with ancient Asian deities; Virginia Mollenkott, an avowed pro-abortion lesbian; Elizabeth Bettenhausen, professor at Harvard Divinity School; Lois Wilson, a United Church of Canada “minister”; Jose Hobday, a Roman Catholic nun….
Eighteen times Chung summoned the spirits of the dead and claimed that “without hearing the cries of these spirits, we cannot hear the voice of the Holy Spirit.” Chung said, “I hope the presence of all our ancestor’s spirits here with us shall not make you uncomfortable.” She also summoned “the spirit of Earth, Air, and Water.” Chung said, “I also know that I no longer believe in an omnipotent, Macho, warrior God who rescues all good guys and punishes all bad guys.” Chung concluded her message by likening the “spirit” to the idolatrous image of Kwan, “a goddess of compassion and wisdom (worshipped in) East Asian women’s popular religiosity.” Chung went even further in her blasphemy when she said, “Perhaps this might also be a feminine image of the Christ who is the first born among us, one who goes before and brings others with her.” [06]
,At the conference in Minneapolis “the deputy general secretary of the WCC, Mercy Oduyoye, taught that we all have “spirit mothers” who avenge us and that the spirits of the dead surround us “in the rustling of trees, in the groaning woods, in the crying grass, in the moaning rocks.” The same conference also featured Kwok Pui-Lan, a WCC member who defined salvation as “bringing out what is within you” and quoted the Gnostic gospels. Pui-Lan justified her use of Gnostic texts by stating that, since it was men who decided the canon of the Bible, she was not obliged to accept it. [07]
While I know nothing about their beliefs, The Brethren Revival Fellowship presents some very disturbing facts about the 1993 conference. Here are some excerpts from the article (All emphasis added)
Re-shaping Christianity: “The entire Conference was an assault on the Gospel and a trampling under foot of key tenets of the Christian faith. The new religion promoted at the Re-imagining Conference soundly rejected the incarnation of Jesus, as well as His atonement on the Cross. The reporter in the Minneapolis Star Tribune, said that the conference leaders were “re-shaping the Christian understanding of [the] foundations of theology.” Participants and speakers alike angrily denounced the Christian church, charging that its teachings about Jesus Christ constitute the chief source of women’s oppression, human violence, racism, sexism, classism, and the abuse of the earth.
Faye Short, in the United Methodist Good News magazine, says that the Conference speakers praised every imaginable religion or spirituality except orthodox Christianity, and recognized the power of every deity except Jesus Christ….”
The Atonement: “Delores Williams, a professor at Union Theological Seminary in New York, told the group, “I don’t think we need a theory of atonement at all … atonement has to do so much with death …l don’t think we need folks hanging on crosses, and blood dripping, and weird stuff …we just need to listen to the god within.” Another speaker, Virginia Mollenkott, who serves on the National Council of Churches commission to prepare an inclusive language lectionary, claimed that the death of Jesus was the ultimate in child abuse. She said that the commonly accepted view of Christ’s atonement pictures God as an abusive parent, and Jesus as an obedient child.”
Monism: “Speaker Chung Hyun Kyung drew many of her ideas from Eastern pantheistic religions, in which God is an all-encompassing energy force uniting and permeating all that exists. Chung led the delegates in an exercise that she called “pranic healing,” and said that “this life-giving energy came from god and it is everywhere; it is in the sun and in the ocean; it is from the ground and it is from the trees…lf you feel very tired and you feel you don’t have any energy to give…go to a big tree and ask [the] tree,’Give me some of your life energy.'”
IPS Note: Chung Hyun Kyung is a lay theologian of the Presbyterian Church of Korea, and is also an Associate Professor of Ecumenical Theology at Union Theological Seminary in the United States. See Footnote on Monism
Sophia: “One of the most disturbing aspects of the Minneapolis gathering was the worship and adoration paid to Sophia. The Greek word for “wisdom” is “sophia,” and the name “sophia” is a feminine name. At the Re-imagining Conference, as each speaker took the podium, she received a chanted blessing from the entire assembly. The women chanted, “Bless Sophia, dream the vision, share the wisdom dwelling deep within.” Those who promulgate Sophia-worship claim that they are using “Sophia” as just another name for God, and that they are simply trying to show that there is a female side to God. From their point of view, God must no longer be referred to by male names alone. Speaker Barbara Lundblad raised a few eyebrows when she declared that she “did not need Jesus” as long as she had Sophia.
Lesbianism: “During a workshop entitled “Prophetic Voices of Lesbians in the Church,” one speaker said that the biblical Mary and Martha were not actual sisters, but lesbian lovers. One presenter at the Conference concluded her speech by declaring that her theology is first of all informed by “making love to Coni” her lesbian partner. At least ten of the 34 speakers at the Minneapolis Conference identified themselves as lesbians.
And there is more – plenty more See Paganism At The Re-Imagining Conference In Minneapolis (1993) HERE
Also See Feminism and The Bible
Radical feminists, not only reject historic Christian orthodoxy in favor of neo-paganism and goddess worship, but realizing that in order to change a civilization built on the Bible, the very Bible must be changed. Much of the problems stem from the doctrine of male head-ship… one of the most controversial subjects in the Scripture. Feminists are quite convinced that Head-ship = domination and Subordination = inferiority and denigration. Unfortunately both feminists and an altogether too large a number of traditional church leaders have myopically focused on what they think is Scripture’s treatment of, and instructions regarding, the sexes, with complete disregard for what the Scriptures actually reveal. What is certain is that the Biblical concept of male head-ship has all too often been twisted to generate horrible evil.The WCC and The Catholic Church
Although the Catholic Church is not a formal member of the W.C.C, (because of divergent visions on doctrinal, moral and social questions)various dicasteries of the Roman Curia collaborate in some of its working groups and commissions. A joint working group between the W.C.C. and the Catholic Church was established in 1965 as one of the first fruits of the Second Vatican Council, and over these past 50 years relations have improved considerably”. [08]
One of the many areas of cooperation is between the church and W.C.C. team is in inter-religious dialogue and cooperation.
Papal Visits
On June 21 2018, Pope Francis -the third pope to visit the W.C.C. headquarters – was present for their 70th anniversary celebrations. He was preceded by Pope Paul VI who went to the council headquarters on June 10, 1969 and who hailed the W.C.C. as “a marvelous movement of Christians” and by St. John Paul II who visited twice in 1982.“On the eve of the pope’s trip, Dr Fykse Tveit, a Lutheran pastor of the Church of Norway and general secretary of the WCC since 2010, described Francis’ visit as ‘a strong signal of recognition by the Catholic world; a signal that there exists a worldwide ecumenical movement, in which the Catholic Church participates.’” [09]Footnote I – Monism
Monism is the view that reality consists of one fundamental, ultimate essence. It comes from the Greek mono, which means one. All is one thing, one essential substance; hence, the term substance monism. Therefore, in monism, God, if he exists, and the universe are the same thing. This would mean that energy, motion, matter, thought, consciousness, etc., are all of one substance. However, they are perceived differently. They appear as different things though, in reality, they are ultimately the same essence. Therefore, monism is a fundamental part of the philosophy of pantheism which teaches that all existence is part of the nature of God. [10
Can two walk together, except they be agreed? (Amos 3:3)
“It shall come about if you ever forget the LORD your God and go after other gods and serve them and worship them, I testify against you today that you will surely perish. (Deuteronomy 8:19)
By M. H Reynolds, Editor, FEA News & Views
——————————————————————————————————-.
“WHAT IN THE WORLD IS THE WORLD COUNCIL OF CHURCHES?” This catchy question is also the title of a 1978 publication of the WCC. It is an obvious attempt to answer some of the vital questions and criticisms which are being raised by those who love Jesus Christ and who value o ur cherished American freedoms. However, far from answering such questions and complaints, a discerning reader will discover that the WCC actually confirms the charges of doctrinal deviations and political radicalism,
This leaflet is written to provide factual, up-to-date information regarding the World Council of Churches. We are concerned when we find so many true, Bible-believing Christians who still hold membership in denominations which are a part of the WCC (see complete listing of USA and Canada member denominations on the last page). We also believe that others, both within and without the church, who believe in our free-enterprise system should be informed as to how ecumenical church leaders are seeking to replace capitalism with some form of socialism or communism under the false label of the Kingdom of God. All quotations given in this article are either from the above-mentioned WCC publication or from one of the official documents presented at the meeting of the WCC Central Committee held in Kingston, Jamaica, January 1-1 1, 1979, which the author of this leaflet attended as a member of the press. Thus, all information is strictly up-to-date and fully documentable.
THE HISTORY OF THE WORLD COUNCIL OF CHURCHES begins with its organization in 1948 with 147 denominations from both Protestant and Orthodox backgrounds. Today, it has grown to include 293 member denominations representing some 400 million people. It has been and is a major force and voice of what is commonly called ECUMENISM,A term used to describe the effort to bring all churches into “a visible unity in one faith and one eucharistic fellowship”. The WCC, while admitting that the ecumenical movement is broader than its own institution, claims with ample justification that it is “the most nearly comprehensive instrument of the ecumenical movement in the world today”. It should be further noted that, while the original goal of the ecumenical movement and the WCC was “the unity of the churches”, the new vision of the WCC is for the unity of all religions – and, in fact, all mankind. It should be clear to all who have been watching the WCC that it has become a modern Tower of Babel.
THE DOCTRINAL POSITION OF THE WORLI) COUNCIL OF CHURCHES is deceptive. Supporters of the WCC frequently point to their doctrinal basis when charges of doctrinal heresies and deviations are leveled against the Council. But be sure to read the fine print! Be sure to observe how this doctrinal basis is either ignored or stretched beyond recognition.
THE WCC’s DOCTRINAL BASIS SIMPLY SAYS: “The World Council of Churches is a fellowship of Churches which confess the Lord Jesus Christ as God and Saviour according to the Scriptures and therefore seek to fulfil together their common calling to the glory of the one God, Father, Son and Holy Spirit.” It is hard to find anything wrong with that, right? However, two paragraphs later in this WCC publication, we read, “Since the World Council of Churches is not itself a church, it passes no judgement upon the sincerity with which member churches accept the basis.” Did you get that? You can sign the WCC doctrinal basis whether or not you are sincere and no one will question it. And in the very next paragraph we read the following: “Some very conservative churches judge the basis not biblical enough; some liberal churches DO NOT ACCEPT THE TRINITARIAN FORMULA.” What do you think about that? How can anyone claim to be Christian who denies the Trinity? Yet, the WCC admits it has such churches in membership. In fact, the WCC actually boasts of and glories in their doctrinal diversities. They admit that “Ecumenism exists by holding contradictions together.” They admit that “it is impossible to speak of a single ‘theology of the Council’ as such.” We remind Bible believers that such unity is not true Biblical unity – it is plain open disobedience to the Word of God. II John 9-11
WCC DOCTRINAL DEVIATIONS WERE CLEARLY OBSERVABLE from the Central Committee documents in Jamaica. For instance, note the FALSE TEACHING OF BAPTISMAL REGENERATION. One document said, “Through Baptism every person is made part of the Christian Community . . .” Again, “Through Baptism we are redeemed from the powers of sin and death and incorporated into the one body of Christ.” Note also the FALSE TEACHING OF UNIVERSALISM: “Put succinctly, salvation is a total involvement of God in the world. There is no sphere of life with which human beings, as individuals, as community or as nations, have to wrestle that is not related to God. Jesus Christ is this total involvement of God. In His life, suffering, cross and resurrection, all humanity with its agonies and struggles is judged, liberated and REDEEMED. It is this Christ who has called us as Christians to follow him in God’s continuing work of creation and re-creation.” And again, “Christians believe that all human beings are part of a dynamic pointing towards the messianic Kingdom . . . The Biblical witness refers to this final aim as the ‘Kingdom of God’ which embraces the two dimensions of redemption of the whole of creation and personal fulfilment for each human being.” No wonder the WCC is confused in its programs! It is confused in its doctrine!
THE POLITICAL RADICALISM OF THE WORLD COUNCIL OF CHURCHES is apparent. Just as in the case of doctrinal diversities, the WCC boasts of its ability to hold together exact opposites in the realm of politics. They say, “On other issues the churches recognize strong differences of opinion and seek to maintain a continuing dialogue among their own members. These differences are not limited to trivial matters. For example, THE WORLD COUNCIL OF CHURCHES INCLUDES PACIFIST MEMBER CHURCHES…. IT ALSO INCLUDES REVOLUTIONARIES. Both groups contribute insights to the WCC, They continue to try to influence each other. And the WCC INCLUDES BOTH WITHIN ITS FELLOWSHIP. There you have it. Do not forget for one minute, however, that when WCC leaders speak and WCC pronouncements are issued IT IS ALWAYS THE VOICE OF RADICALISM AND REVOLUTION THAT IS HEARD. There are repeated attacks upon “Western Imperialism” and “capitalism” but seldom a word of criticism for socialism and communism. Noncommunist dictatorships are repeatedly attacked but no word is ever spoken against the communist dictators. A few conservative voices are occasionally heard within WCC meetings – but these rarely, if ever, become a part of the official statements which go to the governments of the world and to the United Nations as a “representative voice of the churches”. Those who claim that the WCC is becoming more “evangelical” are either blind or naive. Evangelicals who remain in the WCC are being used as window dressing to hide the WCC apostasy,
IN JAMAICA, A PRIME TOPIC OF DISCUSSION WAS THE $85,000 GRANT TO THE PATRIOTIC FRONT OF ZIMBABWE (actually a communist guerilla group). The Salvation Army, the Irish Presbyterian Church and a Lutheran Church in Germany have all suspended membership in protest. Both the secular and religious press waited for some explanation, some justification of this atrocious grant to a group which has boasted of murdering missionaries and shooting down a commercial airplane. But all the press really got from the WCC was a charge that the news media had misrepresented and falsified the situation. The WCC Central Committee stood behind its PCR Commission which had recommended the grant and the executive officers who approved it. They concluded by saying that “although the adverse image and understanding of the PCH needs to be changed, the content and thrust of the PCR itself should not be changed.” Incidentally, PCR is the abbreviation for the WCC’s “Program to Combat Racism” – but in reality, it should be called the “Program to Continue Revolution”. Over three million dollars has been given to radical groups around the world. While it is claimed that all monies in this fund come from designated gifts, this program could not operate without the administrative offices and support of the WCC. Those who remain in membership in WCC affiliated churches cannot be absolved from responsibility for giving this aid to the revolutionaries around the world.
THE WORLD COUNCIL OF CHURCHES IS FULLY COMMITTED TO THE CREATION OF ANEW SOCIETY based on socialistic principles and deceitfully called “7ne Kingdom of God”. They state: “The participation of the Church in the creation of a new society is not a secondary or derivative dimension of its existence. It begins at the very centre in the celebration of the sacraments as an anticipation of what the world is to become . . . .” Dr. Philip Potter, WCC General Secretary, quoted from a 1969 WCC Central Committee directive as follows: “We call upon the churches to move beyond charity, grants and traditional programming to relevant and sacrificial action leading to new relationships of dignity and justice among all men and to become THE AGENTS FOR THE RADICAL RECONSTRUCTION OF SOCIETY.” He also made it perfectly clear what this involved when he said, “But the conflict has become intense when it has been perceived that A RADICAL CHANGE OF ECONOMIC, SOCIAL AND POLITICAL STRUCTURES ARE NEEDED AND NOT THE MERE PRUDENTIAL TRANSFER OF RESOURCES AND TECHNOLOGIES.” Another WCC document stated: “in the developed countries it means changes in the production structure and employment policies which will ONLY BE POSSIBLE THROUGH A CERTAIN ‘SOCIALIZATION’ of decisions that have so far been taken autonomously on the basis of interests of the private sector.” MR. BUSINESSMAN, MR. and MRS, FREEDOM-LOVING AMERICAN – the World Council of Churches has made it abundantly clear what their goal is! Are you willing to sit idly by or even help support this effort to destroy the very foundations of our faith and freedom?
THE WORLD COUNCIL OF CHURCHES SUBSTITUTES DIALOGUE FOR WITNESSING. Having substituted the building of a new society in place of the preaching of the gospel of salvation by grace through faith in Jesus Christ, it is not surprising that the WCC should forsake “witness” for “dialogue” even while claiming that dialogue is a form of witness, In recent years, theWCC has been engaged in official dialogues with almost everyone. Roman Catholics, Jews, Muslims, Buddhists, Hindus, Humanists, Traditional African Religions and Communists. As previously noted, the original goal of “Christian unity” has been superseded with the goal of the “unity of all mankind”. They say, “opportunities and occasions for dialogue cannot and must not be confined to men of religious faiths but also must involve men of secular ideologies.” This dialogue program is attractively presented as the WCC claims: “Dialogue offers the promise of discovering new dimensions of understanding our faith.” One repeatedly is told of how dialogue “enriches dimensions of understanding our faith” but strangely, nothing is ever said about proclaiming the truth of the gospel in such a way that men “turn to God from idols to serve the living and true God.”
IT IS IMPORTANT TO REALIZE THAT DIALOGUE IS INDEED ONE OF THE GREAT DANGERS AND DECEPTIONS BEING PRACTICED AND ENCOURAGED BY THE WCC. What is dialogue? According to their own definition, dialogue is, “. . . an OPENING OF THE MIND AND HEART TO OTHERS. It is an undertaking which requires RISK as well as a deep sense of vocation . . . . THIS OPENING, THIS RISK, this vocation, this sensitivity are at the heart of the ecumenical movement and in the deepest currents of the life of the churches.” Further, the WCC says, “Love requires us to recognize and respect the integrity of our partners who enter into dialogue from the standpoint of their faith and commitment.” This is exactly the opposite of Biblical teaching. God says, “And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness but rather reprove them.” Ephesians 5:1 1. The WCC tells us that dialogue is a required form of witness in a pluralistic world, yet they take special pains to assure their partners in dialogue that they “come not as manipulators but as genuine fellow-pilgrims .. . .” The WCC principle of dialogue implies that the Christian is a searcher for truth rather than a proclaimer of the Truth. The WCC says, “Be open, be vulnerable, take a risk.” The Word of God says, “Beware!” “Beware of false prophets which come to you in sheep’s clothing but inwardly they are ravening wolves.” Matthew 7:15. Will you follow Christ or the WCC?
THE WORLD COUNCIL OF CHURCHES AND THE UNITED NATIONS continue their close ties. In fact, we might call them “blood brothers”. There were repeated favorable references to all sorts of UN programs in the Central Committee Documents at Jamaica – The New International Economic Order, the New International Information Order, the World Health Organization, the World Court, UNESCO, etc, It was reported that “an intervention was made on behalf of the WCC in the Security Council debate on South Africa in March 1977.” It was stated that they were seeking “to sensitize churches, inviting them to lobby with their governments . . . as well as to mark the 30th Anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.” The WCC issued a special document promoting the UN sponsored International Year of the Child, totally ignoring the fact that even though this appeal is made with the image of starving children in mind, the real thrust of this program is toward socialization of the child and the family. Individual believers and churches that are opposed to the philosophy and program of the UN should realize that it is not their voice which is heard in places of power and decision – it is the voice of the false prophets in the WCC that prevail and speak for you whether you like it or not.
THE WORLD COUNCIL OF CHURCHES stands for DISARMAMENT and against U.S. NATIONAL SECURITY. The WCC is geared for a massive propaganda effort against our historic concept of national security. They want complete and unilateral disarmament – and they want it now. But it is ironic that at the very time the WCC is attacking America and the nations of the Free World for wanting to maintain national security, they are insisting on national sovereignty and security for the many new nations and governments which have been formed through communist revolutions. Following the WCC “Program for Disarmament and Against Militarism and the Arms Race” would leave America defenseless against her enemies. Yet, the Central Committee in Jamaica said that the churches should give “the highest priority” to implementation of this program. But if you read the entire document, you find that the WCC has taken this strong position in spite of the admission that they have not fully explored the underlying theological issues, They say, “These two meetings … have underlined the need for more substantial work on the theological issues involved. They have posed questions rather than providing answers.” What dangerous hypocrisy and liberal bias this reveals. Americans should remember that nations which lose their freedom rarely have a second chance.
THE CONFUSION, DOUBLE-TALK AND CONTRADICTIONS IN FACT OF THE WCC ARE CLEARLY VISIBLE TO ANYONE WHO WILL TAKE THE TIME TO STOP, LOOK AND LISTEN! As the years have slipped by with little progress toward the goal of “one visible church”, their frustrations have been manifested in the use of clever language to hide their failures. Instead of “One Church” we hear talk of “conciliar fellowship” and “unity in reconciled diversity” and trying to “relate the right kind of diversity to the right kind of unity.” Through the years, they have followed the old ecumenical motto, “Service Unites, Doctrine Divides”. But in spite of their wish to ignore doctrine, the issue continues to re-appear. At times, WCC leaders introduce new word games or “theological breakthroughs” which they announce with a great fanfare, seeking to revive the hopes of their disillusioned followers.
THE LATEST “BRIGHT SPOT” ON THE WCC’s THEOLOGICAL HORIZON is the idea that while they may not all be able to agree on the content of their faith, they can all agree that there is HOPE. The problem is that they cannot even agree on what that HOPE is. One of the WCC documents at Jamaica said, “The difference between the hopes expressed from different parts of the world – Africa, Latin America, North America, Eastern Europe -diverged so widely that ONE WAS TEMPTED TO ASK WHETHER THEY WERE SPEAKING OF THE SAME HOPE or indeed whether they can even give a common account of hope.” But they went on to state, “Yet, the common attempt itself has become a source of hope.” How sad it is that those in the WCC are ignoring the Bible which tells us plainly that our hope our only hope – is the return of Jesus Christ. Titus 2:13. How sad it is that they ignore the teaching of Scripture that the Kingdom of God is not some socialistic kingdom established through the efforts of man, but a perfect and righteous Kingdom to be set up by our Lord Jesus Christ in spite of and apart from any effort of man to either thwart or aid the establishment of that Kingdom. Daniel 2:44. Revelation 19:13-16.
AT THE VERY HEART OF THE WHOLE MATTER IS THE FAILURE OF THE WORLD COUNCIL OF CHURCHES TO ACCEPT THE BIBLE as the authoritative, infallible, inerrant, eternal, unchangeable Word of God. Note the following: “In the WCC we experience both the possibility for common confession of faith and worship together and also the obstacles to Christian unity. We are agreed in giving vital place in our thinking to bible study and worship, we are able to worship our one Lord in the very different way of the churches represented among us. YET WE ARE ALSO AWARE OF PROBLEMS CONCERNING THE AUTHORITY OF THE BIBLE REMAINING UNSOLVED AMONG US and of the fact that we are not yet part of one eucharistic fellowship. It is not surprising therefore that there is controversy among Christians about the meditative use (rather than simply the intellectual study) of the holy books of other faiths and about the QUESTION OF COMMON WORSHIP BETWEEN THOSE OF DIFFERENT FAITHS.” One speaker said, “The document on Hope coming out of Bangalore had succeeded in bringing out the fruitful tension between doctrinal unity and union in radical involvement in human hopes. But it has not settled the underlying question.” What is that underlying question? “The problem is no longer the problem of loving one another, but the problem of understanding the faith.” The doctrinal basis of the WCC is an empty shell – a front to deceive the unwary. Only by accepting God’s Word as our only, absolute and final authority can we enter into true unity with those who truly belong to Christ – and at the same time be fully separated from those who appear as angels of light but are in reality the servants of Satan.
MANY OTHER PROGRAMS AND FACETS OF THE WORLD COUNCIL OF CHURCHES could be helpfully presented and documented if space permitted. Take Roman Catholicism for example. The WCC has grown so close to the Roman Catholic Church that they now say, “The days of winning converts from each other are over . . . .” Take the question of communism. You will never find the WCC to be anti-communist. In fact, they state plainly, “The story of primitive anti-communism and anti-communist crusades in the Christian Church is a long and sad one.” Red Agents and Communist puppet church leaders sit, work and propagandize at all levels of the WCC organization. The WCC and the NCC have been decisive forces in preparing the way for the shameful U.S. recognition of Red China. Though denying charges of pro-communism, the WCC track record is a long and consistent testimony to the fact that they are one of communism’s strongest and best allies. The WCC is doing everything possible to indoctrinate young people into the radical, revolutionary ecumenical philosophy. It was reported that four young people, including one WCC staff person, attended the “11th World Festival of Youth and Students” in Cuba in 1978. They reported a “warm and wholehearted welcome from the Cuban people and the freedom to move around the island and to talk to the people.” And what was the purpose of this meeting? They said, “These meetings provided opportunities for the Christian Youth to discuss the issues of the festival and the meaning of Christian commitment today, AS WELL AS TO EXPRESS SOLIDARITY IN THE STRUGGLES FOR JUSTICE AND AGAINST IMPERIALISM IN THE WORLD TODAY. “Is there any talk of struggling against Communism? Oh, no, it is only against Imperialism!
THE NEXT THREE YEARS WILL BE CRITICAL YEARS FOR THE WORLD COUNCIL OF CHURCHES, largely because of severe financial problems. The fact that most of the WCC money comes from the USA, coupled with the devaluation of the dollar in comparison with the Swiss Franc, means that the WCC is faced with what one leader called “The moment of truth in WCC finances”. To avoid drastic and immediate cut-backs of staff and programs, they approved deficit spending for the next three years, drawing on reserves or even borrowing if necessary. Financing is apparently already in hand or in view to proceed with their big conference in Cambridge, Massachusetts, July 12-24, 1979, on the theme, “FAITH, SCIENCE AND THE FUTURE” and their big missionary-evangelism conference to be held in Melbourne, Australia, May 12-25, 1980, on the theme “YOUR KINGDOM COME”. The 1979 conference will seek to join religion and science to further socialism and the 1980 meeting will promote socialism in the name of the Kingdom of God.
IF ONLY GOD’S PEOPLE WOULD WAKE UP AND SEE HOW THE WORLD COUNCIL OF CHURCHES IS USING THE CHURCHES TO DESTROY THE VERY FOUNDATIONS OF FAITH AND FREEDOM, what a difference it could make! If only God’s people would immediately withhold support and withdraw membership from the WCC and then begin attending and supporting only those churches that refuse to compromise with the ecumenical apostasy, what a difference it would make! Further loss of support now could be critical for the WCC. Are you one of those who are supporting the WCC by your finances and membership even while decrying its heretical, radical programs? If so, why not obey God – COME OUT AND BE SEPARATE (11 Corinthians 6:14-18) and join hands with those who are willing to stand up and speak out for our God-given liberties which enable us to preach the gospel (good news) of Jesus Christ instead of a socialist revolution.
WORLD COUNCIL OF CHURCHES MEMBER DENOMINATIONS IN THE USA AND CANADAUNITED STATES OF AMERICA
African Methodist Episcopal Church; African Methodist Episcopal Zion Church; American Baptist Churches in the U.S.A; American Lutheran Church; The Antiochian Orthodox Christian Archdiocese of New York and all North America; Christian Church (Disciples of Christ); Christian Methodist Episcopal Church; Church of the Brethren; The Episcopal Church; Hungarian Reformed Church in America; International Evangelical Church; Lutheran Church in America; Moravian Church in America (Northern Province); Moravian Church in America (Southern Province); National Baptist Convention of America; National Baptist Convention, U,S.A., Inc.; National Council of Churches of Christ in the U,S.A.; National Council of Community Churches; The Orthodox Church in America; Polish National Catholic Church of America; Presbyterian Church in the United States; Progressive National Baptist Convention; Reformed Church in America; Religious Society of Friends – Friends General Conference – Friends United Meetings; United Church of Christ; The United Methodist Church; The United Presbyterian Church in the United States of America.
CANADA
The Anglican Church of Canada; Canadian Council of Churches; Canadian Yearly Meeting of the Society of Friends; Christian Church (Disciples of Christ); The Evangelical Lutheran Church of Canada; The Presbyterian Church in Canada; The United Church of Canada,Fundamental Evangelistic Association P0, Box 6278 Los Osos, California 93412
EXECUTIVE ORDER: UNITED NATIONS ALLOWED TO USE FORCE ON US CITIZENS
The militarization of local police, combined with the arrival of a United Nations military presence, could mean big trouble for liberty and freedom here in America.
U.S. Ambassador Samantha Power told attendees at an important U.N. meeting that the United States was “proud” and “humbled” to be a included in the new agenda and promised to follow by the 18 pledges. Fox News
The arrival of the United Nations requires federalization of police in order to set a global standard of law enforcement. President Barack Obama has pounced on the opportunity to exploit recent shootings to push for the federalization of local police forces.
Videos have been flooding the internet documenting United Nations military-like vehicles moving across America.
One World Government Is Now INEVITABLE – The UN Global Migration Compact EXPOSED!
https://youtu.be/g2V9-tr4ck0
spacer
CONGRESS FORBIDS TRUMP To WITHDRAWAL From NATO
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Movlpe3Yxv8
Did Former President Donald Trump Take the U.S. Out of NATO?
House passes NATO bill to send a strong message to Trump …
Published on Mar 17, 2019
spacer
Please click here to continue to Part 2 – UN is not your FRIEND -THE NOAHIDE
spacer