RESTORED 10/21/20; Restored again 12/20/20; RESTORED 3/23/22
Then they took wives, each choosing for himself; whom they began to approach, and with whom they cohabited; teaching them sorcery, incantations, and the dividing of roots and trees.
In the light of what we have seen so far about the Fallen Angels and their offspring and how they are currently active on the earth, leading and sometimes even forcing mankind into all manner of evil, it should be obvious to you that the medical community is NOT YOUR FRIEND. The majority of what the Angels taught to humankind was related to mixing of materials to cause or to heal diseases and infirmities, to cause abortions or cure impotency, to stop aging and CHANGE DNA, to create life in many forms all perverted. Mixing of species, and polluting of DNA. Wake UP! Go back and read the list of Fallen Angels and what they taught to women/mankind.
Hey, just a side note here, I know we are not addressing abortion at the moment but, if you want to see the devil face to face visit an abortion protest, and look at the people who are pro-abortion! They are demon possessed. You will be amazed at the juxtaposition between those who are pro-life and those who are pro-abortion. They are scary! They will spit and growl and try to kill you. Be careful!
Many of you may be frightened to think that you cannot trust the medical professionals. Especially since you have done so all your life. You may even be one who was trained in nursing, pharmaceuticals, researcher, or maybe you are a physician. I am telling you, without question, that the medical field is totally corrupt and evil. Please don’t misunderstand. I am not saying that EVERYONE in the medical field is EVIL. There are multitudes of people in that industry that have good hearts and good intentions. However, they have been brought up and trained in an evil system.
One must be careful not to jump from one err to another. There are many alternative healers and healing disciplines. WATCH OUT, many of them are rooted in paganism and dark arts as well. IF you need healing, SEEK GOD. Seek like believers. PRAY. GOD will show you what you need to do and who you can trust.
The ELITES who run this world are driven by demonic spirits who want you dead… but first they want you to suffer while paying them for the privilege. Their goal with these Vaccines is to change your DNA, to corrupt everyone. That is the sin that condemned them to HELL, polluting the DNA. If you don’t think these people are evil and lying to you… start researching all the Holistic Doctors who were proving vaccines were causing Autism, who are now dead or mysteriously disappeared. Then you can research all the RESEARCHERS who were working with viral chemistry and see how many of them suddenly were dead or disappeared. Then you can research all the CDC workers and the reporters. These people will stop at nothing to keep the truth from you and to convince you that they are working in your best interest. WAKE UP!
Just to help you get your mind in the right place… LOOK at all of this information on VACCINES!
Published on Jul 16, 2019
Child vaccinations- Who will jab the children with the clot shot?All while never missing one text on their pimp phone.. ? 🤔
Over the last year, they purposely showed us people getting injected over & over & over again trying to magnify the power of suggestion with repetition; and who did we see injecting all those people?
4 months, 1 week ago
Dr. Judy A Mikovits & Travis Middletion ~ Deep Truths re: Medical Tyranny
Published on May 9, 2019
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN REPOSTED ON YOUTUBE BY SOUND MINDS VIEW IT BELOW:
THESE “SCIENTISTS” have a license to do whatever they want to do without having to answer to anyone. They don’t care about the consequences, and they certainly don’t care about you. As evidenced by CERN, they don’t even care if they blow up the WORLD! CERN scientists have stated that if we conceive of a possibility, we have to try it. No matter what. Where ever their crazy minds take them they can play and investigate and create any insanely dangerous and destructive thing they so desire and force it on the unsuspecting public. A public who erroneously believe that these things have been tried, tested and approved. WAKE UP!
The good old days
Ancient Bacterial DNA Could Thwart a Devastating Disease
The unique bacterial DNA of CpG oligonucleotides will reinforce the hepatitis B vaccine and could drop liver cancer rates.
Hepatitis B virus infects around 20,000 people per year in the United States, according to the CDC. Typically, the virus causes severe inflammation of the liver. Symptoms include fatigue, muscle aches, jaundice, abdominal pain, fever, discolored urine, weight loss, and an inability to tolerate fatty foods.
Normally, the virus comes and goes—but sometimes the virus causes long-term liver damage (cirrhosis) or liver cancer. In fact, hepatitis B virus is the most common cause of liver cancer in the world.
Two hepatitis B virus vaccines are currently on the market. Earlier this month, however, the Food and Drug Administration licensed another hepatitis B vaccine. This new vaccine employs a unique strategy: fighting the hepatitis B virus with … bacterial DNA.
Here’s how it works. All of our cells contain DNA, consisting of various combinations of nucleotides called cytosine, guanine, adenine, and thymine. DNA provides a blueprint that instructs cells on how to reproduce themselves.
Bacteria also contain DNA. Bacterial DNA, however, has certain patterns of nucleotides that aren’t found in human DNA. From the moment that we crawled out of the ocean onto land, we have been able to recognize these unique bacterial DNA patterns—a crude and early part of our immune system. There’s a reason for this primitive form of immunity: Once microbes breach the surface of our skin or intestines, where they live in large numbers, they can kill us. We need a defense system that is capable of recognizing these unique bacterial-specific molecular patterns and responding to them—immediately.
Which brings us back to the new hepatitis B vaccine. It’s identical to the two existing hepatitis B vaccines—which have been available since the 1990s—in that it contains 20 micrograms of a protein that is located on the surface of the virus. But unlike these other hepatitis B vaccines, the new vaccine also contains 3 milligrams of repeated linkages of cytosine and guanine—a molecular pattern unique to bacterial DNA called CpG oligonucleotides.
It’s the first time this immune-boosting product has been used in a vaccine. (The “p” just stands for the phosphodiester linkage that binds the cytosine and guanine.)
The FDA licensed this novel hepatitis B vaccine for people older than 18 years of age in certain high-risk groups like household contacts of someone who is infected, injection drug users, healthcare workers, or people with HIV, diabetes, or chronic lung or kidney diseases.
Although the existing hepatitis B vaccines have been lifesavers (virtually eliminating the disease in children), some problems have remained, especially for adults. About 5 percent of adults don’t respond to the vaccine. No matter how many doses are given, they are simply unable to make an adequate immune response. Second: some groups, including those most likely to benefit, don’t always develop an effective response. This is where the CpG oligonucleotides come in.
The CpG-containing hepatitis B vaccine has now been tested in about 14,000 adults. To figure out whether this novel vaccine strategy worked, researchers tested the quantity of hepatitis B virus-specific antibodies in serum (seroprotection). Two doses of the new hepatitis B vaccine were compared to three doses of one of the other hepatitis B vaccines. Seven months after the last dose, 95 percent of those who had received the vaccine containing the CpG motif developed protective antibodies as compared with 81.2 percent in the comparator group. The CpG vaccine also induced protective immunity more quickly and offered greater seroprotection in patients with type-2 diabetes (90 percent vs. 65.1 percent), people who were obese (94.7 percent vs. 75.4 percent), and people who smoked (95.3 percent vs. 78.8 percent).
Furthermore, the CpG-containing hepatitis B vaccine worked better in all age groups, including those who were 18 to 29 years old (100 percent vs. 93.9 percent), 30 to 39 years old (98.9 percent vs. 92 percent), 40 to 49 years old (97.2 percent vs. 84.2 percent), 50 to 59 years old (95.2 percent vs. 79.7 percent), and 60 to 70 years old (91.6 percent vs. 72.6 percent).
Notably, the two hepatitis B vaccines tested were indistinguishable with regards to mild or severe reactions—with the exception of one weird observation. Using small numbers derived from the large database of 14,000 vaccine recipients, the new vaccine was found to cause a statistically significant increase in heart attacks, along with a statistically significant decrease in prostate cancer. Because both of these outcomes are biologically implausible, both can be viewed skeptically. The issue of heart attacks, however, will be followed up in post-licensure studies.
Ironically, the best way to address the problems with the hepatitis B vaccine—as well as with any strategy necessitating the induction of long-lasting, specific immunity—might be to solicit the help of a part of our immune system that is designed to respond to something entirely different.
Extracting ancient DNA
Museums worldwide hold large collections of preserved specimens of living things. In well preserved specimens, the cell nucleus contains DNA that scientists can extract and use for experimentation. This DNA is known as ancient DNA.
Why are we interested in extracting ancient DNA?
Ancient DNA gives us a snapshot of the molecular make-up of an individual in a species at a certain point in time. It’s particularly useful for molecular evolutionary studies where questions about speciation or phylogenetics are being investigated.
Find out about the research that looked at barcoding New Zealand swamp hens.
Where can we find ancient DNA?
Ancient DNA can be extracted from a wide range of source material. Much of this source material is found in museums. This material includes archaeological specimens, fossils, historical skeletal material, mummified tissues, medical specimen archives and preserved plant remains.
Extracting ancient DNA from bone samples
The DNA extraction process varies according to the source material. These are the steps for a bonesample:
- Take a small sample (0.5–1.0g) of bone.
- Grind this into powder.
- Decalcify by suspending the sample in EDTA overnight at room temperature.
- Centrifuge to collect the sediment.
- Digest the sediment with proteinase K and DTT (dithiothreitol) overnight at 50–55°C.
- Extract the samples twice with phenol and once with chloroform.
- Centrifuge to recover the DNA.
- Make multiple copies of the DNA using polymerase chain reaction (PCR).
(Source: Leonard, J., Wayne, R.K. and Cooper, A. (2000). ‘ Population genetics of Ice Age brown bearsPNAS, 97 (4): 1651–1654.)
Find out more about polymerase chain reaction (PCR).
DNA contamination is a problem
Working with ancient DNA presents a number of challenges for scientists.
In particular, because the amount of ancient DNA is so small, scientists need to avoid contamination from other sources of DNA. In the lab, they use several procedures to ensure results are authentic and reproducible:
- Using a ‘clean’ lab where no other DNA is handled and wearing protective clothing.
- Adding negative controls to monitor for introduction of contaminating DNA, for example, including PCR blanks.
- Reproducing the results, for example, by using the same PCR primers on different DNA extracts from the same source material.
DNA quality is lower
Unlike DNA extracted from fresh samples, ancient DNA is mostly low-quality DNA. Ancient DNA is of low average molecular size and is often damaged over time by exposure to air. This makes cloning ancient DNA difficult. Most molecular analyses of ancient DNA use PCR to amplify the number of copies of the DNA. Generally, ancient DNA cloning is restricted to high copy number mitochondrial DNA sequences.
What is extracted ancient DNA used for?
Scientists are using ancient DNA to investigate:
- evolutionary relationships between species
- how new species arise (speciation)
- how species became extinct
- impacts of climate change on species
- DNA barcoding.
Read the article DNA barcoding to find out more.
Dangers of Vaccines
Exposing the myths and the lies!
Harmful Ingredients in Vaccines
What’s in a vaccine? Have you ever wondered? Many times, we just “trust the authorities” on vaccination and don’t ever ask this simple question. Obviously vaccines contain antigens. Aside from that, vaccines contain adjuvants and other chemicals, stabilizers, and preservatives. Antibiotics are added to help prevent contamination during manufacturing. Despite the presence of antibiotics, many vaccines are still contaminated. Other questionable harmful ingredients in vaccines include formaldehyde, mercury, aluminum, and other toxic ingredients.
These ingredients make some wary parents concerned about vaccine safety. In today’s world, we are highly conscious about what types of foods we eat and what we give our children. We do our best to avoid toxins and chemicals in our food. Research is still out on the safety of genetically modified food, preservatives and food additives. So we find ourselves spending longer in the grocery isle reading labels, trying to avoid things that are processed or artificial.
Breast-feeding is encouraged as the healthiest thing for both baby and mom. We take giant measures to make sure we are doing what’s best for our children. How are we as a society reconciling injecting the following harmful ingredients in vaccines as healthy for our children?
Additives and Harmful Ingredients in Vaccines
For many years children received 237 micrograms (mcg) of mercury in vaccines during their first two years of life. The Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA), recommended “safe” level (to ingest, not inject) is 1/10th of 1mcg per kilogram a day. Vaccines have far exceeded these levels. Many people now question if thimerosal in vaccines contributes to the striking rise in autism that has occurred right alongside the increased number of vaccines.
Injected mercury is different than ingested mercury. In fact, it is 100 times more toxic and is associated with neurological damage. Mercury is 500 times more toxic than lead and is second only to Plutonium as the most toxic metal known to man. Mercury poisoning and the symptoms of autism are strikingly similar. In addition, mercury is a known carcinogen. Ironically, cancer is the leading cause of death to children past infancy. Could taking combined vaccines with mercury be contributing to cancer in our children?
Mercury is one of the most harmful ingredients in vaccines. A rabbit will die if given a mere 35 mcgs. Many people have mercury amalgam fillings. Having these type fillings complicates matters by creating a build up of mercury in the body. Why on earth are we putting one of the most toxic substances known to man in a vaccine?
There are NO safe amounts of mercury established for humans. Children receive combined vaccines that can build up mercury in the body and cause problems. Not one study exists showing it’s safe to inject mercury into humans.
Aborted Fetal Tissue in Vaccines
Vaccines which contain aborted fetal tissue are a concern for some people, especially those who are religious. The irony is, it’s legal to abort a fetus, but if that fetus is born, you are forced by law to inject other aborted fetus’s tissue into your child so that your child can attend school. So a mother’s rights over her child end with abortion.
Furthermore, there appears to be a correlation between the uses of aborted human fetal cells with the coincidental rise of autism.
Several online articles corroborate that coincidence demonstrating that aborted fetal tissue may be one of the most harmful ingredients in vaccines.
We see a spike in autism in 1995 with the introduction of human DNA to the MMR (measles, mumps, ruebella) vaccine, suggesting a possible link. According to Helen Ratajczak, former senior scientist at a pharmaceutical firm, there is a link to brain damage and human DNA in vaccines. DNA in vaccines is taken up by human cells and recombined into their genome.
The following is a list of vaccines containing aborted fetal cells:
- Polio Vaccines, Pentacel, DT Polio Absorbed, Quadracelâ€”all by Sanofi
- Measles, Mumps, Rubella Vaccines
- MMR II, Meruvax II, MRVax, Biovax, ProQuad, MMR-V all Merck vaccines
- Priorix and Erolalix by GlaxoSmithKline
- Varicella Vaccines for Chickenpox or Shingles
- Verivax, ProQuad, MMR-V, and Zostavax all by Merck
- Varilix by GSK
- Hepatitis Vaccines
- Vaqta by Merck
- Havrix and Twinrix by GSK
- Avaxim and Vivaxim by Sanofi
- Epaxal by Crucell/Berna
- Rabies Vaccine
- Imovax by Sanofi
Animal DNA also Used in Vaccines
Vaccines also contain foreign animal DNA from monkeys, pigs, and insects. If you are a vegan, this may be an issue for you. In addition, scientists grow some vaccines in chicken embryos so they contain egg protein.
These vaccine ingredients are known as adjuvants, excipients, and growing mediums. If you would never eat these things, and they are not even safe to place on your skin, why on earth would you inject them? Vaccines have always contained harmful ingredients that are linked to numerous health issues including cancer.
—SV40 (Simian Virus) Responsible for Cancer Cases
In the 1950s, rhesus monkey kidney cells, which contain Simian Virus 40 (SV40) if the animal is infected, were used in preparing polio vaccines. SV40 is a cancer causing virus that now infects humans thanks to the US government.
Because SV40 was not discovered until 1960, no one was aware in the 1950s that the polio vaccinecould be contaminated. Almost 100,000 people were given a vaccine with this cancer-causing agent. Both the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and vaccine giant Merck admitted this atrocity publicly.
Dr. Maurice Hilleman, MD, a renowned scientist who developed Merck’s vaccine program and dozens of vaccines, made astounding revelations to the public that Merck had been injecting this dangerous virus into people worldwide.
MERK – CANCER – SV40 and AIDS in VACCINES – ADMISSION BY Dr. Maurice Hilleman
alt link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-uGWut6IRfA&feature=youtu.be
Even after the US government knew about contamination, they allegedly continued to inject children with the contaminated vaccine until the 1990s.
SV40 is known to cause different types of cancers in laboratory animals including mesotheliomas, lymphomas and brain cancers.
A study in The New England Journal of Medicine, found that mothers who received the Salk polio vaccine had brain tumors at a rate “13 times greater” than mothers who received no vaccine! When harmful ingredients in vaccines include cancer, it’s time to step back and re-evaluate your risk vs. benefit ratio.
Recombinant DNA a Biohazard
Yes, a bio hazard has been found in vaccines. Recombinant DNA, often shortened to rDNA, can occur when a combination of two or more gene sequences occur. rDNA is basically an artificial DNA strand.
Believe it or not, genetically modified Human Papillomavirus (HPV) DNA, (firmly attached to aluminum) was found in blood samples of a 13 year old girl who became chronically ill following her third dose of the controversial vaccine Gardasil. This vaccine purports to protect against HPV and cervical cancer. We’ve yet to see any solid research to back those claims.
However, a quick visit to the website The Truth About Gardasil website proves there are plenty of injuries and deaths caused by the harmful ingredients in this vaccine. rDNA could potentially cause human cell mutations and cancer. Yes, we now know rDNA can form and attach to the adjuvant aluminum.
Research shows aluminum is harmful to all life forms. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved aluminum for use as an adjuvant in vaccines as a way to boost immune response.
Aluminum interferes with many cellular and metabolic processes in the body’s nervous system and tissues. The American Academy of Pediatrics confirms aluminum affects the body negatively.
Apparently, the FDA limits the dosage to 0.85 milligrams per vaccine. This is supposed to minimize exposure to children. How can this possibly work when children receive other vaccines at the same time that also contain aluminum?
Children receive multiple aluminum containing vaccines at once. Repeated exposure to aluminum can have damaging effects. If following the recommended schedule of the CDC, a child gets injected every couple of months with more aluminum. Studies with mice demonstrate a transient rise in aluminum levels in brain tissue. This means aluminum builds up in the brain and potentially other organs. Aluminum is widely associated with breast cancer. More recent research shows a link between aluminum and Alzheimer’s Disease.
A preservative used in vaccines called Polysorbate 80 is so toxic that it should never touch your skin or be ingested. Injecting something directly into the body, bypassing all our normal walls and fences, is even more dangerous. Polysorbate 80 should definitely not be injected, and yet it is in vaccines. Studies with lab rats show this preservative has both carcinogenic and infertility effects.
Yet, it’s ironic that this carcinogenic ingredient is found both in Merck’s cancer vaccine, Gardasil, and is also used in chemotherapy given to cancer patients.
Formaldehyde is another toxic ingredient injected into millions of children annually. There is sufficient evidence from cancer studies in humans proving the carcinogenic effects of this ingredient. Both the Environmental Protection Agency and the International Agency for Research on Cancer admit formaldehyde is a carcinogen. Why is the CDC putting known carcinogens in vaccines?
Is it a coincidence that leukemia is the number one cancer in children? Vaccines poison the blood and formaldehyde has been associated with leukemia.
Common sense tells us to avoid toxins in our food, so why have we allowed authorities to brainwash us into thinking injecting these poisons can lead to health of any kind? Just take a look at what your child receives before they start kindergarten, unless you opt out of a vaccine or two.
Vaccine Ingredients Given to Small Children
In the first 6 years of life your child potentially receives the following:
• 17,500 mcg 2-phenoxyethanol (antifreeze)
• 5,700 mcg aluminum (a known neurotoxin)
• Unknown amounts of fetal bovine serum (aborted cow blood)
• 801.6 mcg formaldehyde (carcinogen, embalming agent)
• 23,250 mcg gelatin (ground up animal carcasses)
• 500 mcg human albumin (human blood)
• 760 mcg of monosodium L-glutamate (causes obesity & diabetis)
• Unknown amounts of MRC-5 cells (aborted human babies)
• Over 10 mcg neomycin (antibiotic)
• Over 0.075 mcg polymyxin B (antibiotic)
• Over 560 mcg polysorbate 80 (carcinogen)
• 116 mcg potassium chloride (used in lethal injection to shut down the heart and stop breathing)
• 188 mcg potassium phosphate (liquid fertilizer agent)
• 260 mcg sodium bicarbonate (baking soda)
• 70 mcg sodium borate (Borax, used for cockroach control)
• 54,100 mcg of sodium chloride (table salt)
• Unknown amounts of sodium citrate (food additive)
• Unknown amounts of sodium hydroxide (Danger! Corrosive)
• 2,800 mcg sodium phosphate (toxic to any organism)
• Unknown amounts of sodium phosphate monobasic monohydrate (toxic to any organism)
• 32,000 mcg sorbitol (Not to be injected)
• 0.6 mcg streptomycin (antibiotic)
• Over 40,000 mcg sucrose (cane sugar)
• 35,000 mcg yeast protein (fungus)
• 5,000 mcg urea (metabolic waste from human urine)
• Other chemical residuals
(From the book, “What The Pharmaceutical Companies Don’t Want You To Know About Vaccines” – By Dr Todd M. Elsner)
TOXIC INGREDIENTS FOUND IN VACCINES
- aluminum hydroxide
- aluminum phosphate
- ammonium sulfate
- amphotericin B
- animal tissues: pig blood, horse blood, rabbit brain, dog kidney, monkey kidney, chick embryo, chicken egg, duck egg, calf (bovine) serum
- fetal bovine serum (Foetal Bovine Serum (FBS), also known as Fetal Calf Serum (FCS) and a range of other high quality animal blood products are available from TCS Biosciences)
- gelatin (derived from collagen taken from animal body parts. Brittle when dry and gummy when moist, it is also called hydrolyzed collagen, collagen hydrolysate, gelatine hydrolysate, hydrolyzed gelatine, and collagen peptides. It is commonly used as a gelling agent in food, medications, drug and vitamin capsules, photographic films and papers, and cosmetic)
- human diploid cells (originating from human aborted fetal tissue)
- hydrolized gelatin
- mercury thimerosol (thimerosal, Merthiolate)
- monosodium glutamate (MSG) (a poison used to kill rats in china)
- neomycin sulfate
- phenol red indicator
- phenoxyethanol (antifreeze)
- potassium monophosphate
- polymyxin B
- polysorbate 20
- polysorbate 80
- porcine (pig) pancreatichydrolysate of casein
- residual MRC5 proteins (Human Fetal Lung Fibroblast Cells (MRC-5 Line)
- VERO cells, a continuous line of monkey kidney cells
- washed sheep red blood
(Source: The Physician’s Warranty of Vaccine Safety)
In summary, if we are cognizant about other toxins in our environment, shouldn’t we be taking a deeper look at what’s injected into our children? Vaccines have known neuro-toxins and carcinogens, foreign DNA, aborted fetal cells, and preservatives. Is it a coincidence we have skyrocketing autism, cancer, and chronic illness in our children?
Product is 20 ml of a 10% suspension of sheep red blood cells collected into Alsever’s solution (Dextrose, sodium chloride, sodium citrate), washed with phosphate buffered saline and preserved with borate buffer, sodium acetate and 1% penicillin streptomycin.
Sheep Red Blood Cells, 10% is suitable for immunoassays (rosetting), hemolytic and hemagglutination assays and for assays of heme inhibition.
Immunoassays | Microbiological Applications
You Took Vaccines, Now What?
If you’ve ever had a vaccine (and most of us have), detox can be extremely important to rid yourself of the toxins. Always eat a diet high in organic, raw, leafy greens. This will help pull heavy metals out of your body. Many people have great success with chelation, water and juice fasting, and zeolite (a mineral that picks up metals like a magnet and flushes them safely out of your body.
Zeolite comes in both powdered and liquid. Here is the zeolite I recommend and use. I used both liquid and powder after my son went into anaphylactic shock following a dtap vaccine. Spirulina crosses the blood-brain barrier to also bind with heavy metals and flush them out of the body. Click on the pictures below to get 50% off your very first order. Read this short article about 5 ways to detox from vaccines.
The Polio Vaccine Cover-up
Harmful Effects of Vaccines < PREVIOUS NEXT > Herd Immunity Debunked
Animal and Human DNA in Your Vaccine?!
AMERICA’S PEDIATRICIAN REVEALS SHOCKING AUTISM DISCOVERY
They CENSORED the original of this video but I found it again posted below:
HIstorical Lawsuit Filed!!! ~ CA Medical Dr. Sues CA Medical Board over Mandatory Vaccine Laws
TO VIEW THIS VIDEO on 153NEWS.net click here: LINK
Dr. Ron Kennedy Contact and Donations : mail to: 2448 Guerneville Rd. Ste # 800 Santa Rosa, CA 95403
707-591-4088 email: firstname.lastname@example.org website: www.medical-library.net
Check for Aplanetruth backup video https://153news.net/watch_video.php?v=K5538HH7NS2H
Dr. Kennedy has been in medicine for almost 50 years. He is currently residing and practicing in the State of California.
After the passage of California SB 277 in 2015 which removed parental rights to refuse vaccines for their children, parents began coming to see him to see if they could receive a medical exemption for vaccines.
Dr. Kennedy believes that so many parents came to him because other doctors were afraid to write medical vaccine exemptions, fearing reprisals from the California State Medical Board.
Dr. Kennedy states that doctors fear the loss of their medical license for writing vaccine medical exemptions. This is reportedly what the Medical Board has tried to do with Dr. Bob Sears. See:
California Pediatrician Bob Sears Breaks Silence on Medical Board Opposition to Vaccine Exemptions
Dr. Kennedy states that the California Medical Board goes from school to school demanding medical records of children, without any permission from the parents. Dr. Kennedy says that according to his attorney, this practice by the Medical Board violates two federal laws and two state laws.
The Medical Board then allegedly examines these medical records of school children to find out which doctors are writing vaccine medical exemptions, and then goes after those doctors.
Dr. Kennedy claims that no doctor has been willing to stand up to this practice until now. He is suing each of the 14 members of the State Medical Board in California.
Published on Jan 29, 2019
Robert F. Kennedy Jr.: Q&A About Vaccine Safety
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is the chairman of the World Mercury Project.
The nonprofit organization’s goal is to “ban all uses of mercury on a global level.”
The group states that mercury is the second most toxic element on Earth and can cause inflammation in brain tissue. That inflammation has been connected to autism, Alzheimer’s disease, multiple sclerosis, and other ailments.
The group says mercury is released into the air by coal-fired power plants and can be found in our food supply.
Mercury is also in thimerosal, a preservative that in the past was used in some but not all childhood vaccines. The ingredient was removedTrusted Source as a safety precaution in 2003.
Thimerosal is still used in flu and tetanus shots.
Officials at the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) say thimerosal is safe to use as a preservative in vaccines, but Kennedy and others aren’t convinced.Bipolar I Medication Option – Official Patient SiteLearn About a Longer Acting Treatment Option That May Help Manage Bipolar I.Prescription Treatment Website
They point out that flu shots are given to pregnant women as well as children.
The group feels strongly enough about the issue that they held a press conference last month and offered a $100,000 reward to anyone who can present a peer-reviewed study that proves that thimerosal is safe.
Healthline has taken a look at both sides of the vaccination debate in a detailed article.
As part of that research, Healthline talked with Kennedy about his concerns. Here are excerpts from that half-hour interview.
Healthline: Why is this issue so important to you?
Kennedy: I was litigating and managing around 30 cases against coal-fired power plants, principally focusing on mercury emissions. I had learned a lot about mercury toxicity. I was going around the country speaking on the issue and I began running into women who would tell me that if I was truly interested in mercury exposures to children that I needed to look at thimerosal in vaccines … As I began reading the science, I was struck by the huge delta between what the actual science said and how it was being presented by the press and the public health regulators … It made me angry that they were continuing the practice of injecting children with neurotoxins.
Healthline: It seems that there is an element in here of fighting against big business. It seems that you could compare this to what the sugar and the tobacco industry did with science.
Kennedy: Sugar, tobacco, the carbon industry. They all did this.
Healthline: Do you see a similarity here?
Kennedy: It’s very similar. This is really almost identical to the global warming debate because you have all the independent science … saying there is an effect. In other words, that carbon is warming the globe and with neurodevelopment disorders [that] mercury in vaccines are causing [them]. Then you have a small [amount] of industry-created science … that purportedly exonerates thimerosal and is really designed and written by industry scientists … and it appears on the CDC’s website. But the science is weak and fraudulent … We brought to our press conference 321 studies … 240 studies on neurological effects other than autism and 81 studies indicating a link to autism. We could not find a single study that says thimerosal was safe … What the CDC tells you is not science. What The New York Times reports is not science. And what your doctor tells you is not science … If you look at [studies] done by research scientists you will find a mountain of studies that support my position and very, very few studies that dispute me.
Healthline: What about vaccines in general? Would you agree that the vast majority of science says vaccines in general are safe?
Kennedy: It’s not my expertise. I don’t think there is any study you can do that would say that particular thing. I think you’d have to look vaccine by vaccine.
Healthline: It seems your main concern is the flu shot, which is given to children and pregnant woman. Is that your focus?
Kennedy: It’s being given to children at 6 months and it’s being given to pregnant women. So, today the exposure a child suffers is probably the greatest in history. If you give a flu shot to a woman who is one or two months pregnant, that child could be getting thousands of times of exposure levels to mercury.
Healthline: You’re talking about a pretty big cover-up or conspiracy here. Do you really think those agencies are in cahoots? That there’s all this corruption within the industry? Because that’s what it would take to pull this off?
Kennedy: The CDC has systemically [within its vaccine branch] ordered its scientists to destroy data, to manipulate data, to massage it, to dump it in garbage cans [if it uncovers] links between development diseases and vaccines. Do I think everyone at the CDC is corrupt? Of course not. There is a tiny handful of corrupt scientists and leaders … The rest of the public health community is not part of any conspiracy, but it has [become part of] the orthodoxy. It’s the same as the pedophile scandal in the Catholic Church … There was a tiny handful of corrupt priests, but the entire church — the bishops, the cardinals, the Vatican, and the other priests — and the prosecutors and the press and the police … told themselves it was more important to protect the institution even though it was injuring the children it was supposed to be protecting. The scandal and silence went on for years before it was exposed.
Healthline: Why would this handful [of CDC employees] do this?
Kennedy: [When information on thimerosal reached CDC officials]they said that if we come clean about this, not only are we going to get sued, but the vaccine companies are going to get sued, and they won’t be able to make any vaccines. I think there was a worry … that if they told the truth, that the American people would lose faith and the institution would be so badly injured that maybe it would create even bigger problems with public health … It’s not completely selfish … There was a genuine concern that this could destroy the whole program and they had to clean it up.
Healthline: Are you worried at all that some of the antivaccination campaigns … could do just that? That they could harm the overall vaccine industry and cause harm to public health?
Kennedy: I don’t see how they can do that because Congress has now passed a law that makes it virtually impossible to sue a vaccine company.
Healthline: Taking this a little broader, do you worry at all that some of the vaccine safety concerns from people might feed into the antiscience mood that seems to be building in the country and that includes climate change?
Kennedy: I’m trying to fight that trend and get people to pay attention to real science. There’s so much scientific illiteracy, especially in the press. The press doesn’t read science … They just parrot what the CDC tells them. Is there any other arena where the press thinks it’s OK to just parrot what a government official tells them?
Healthline: There’s something folks on the other side have said … They think a lot of this is fueled by parents who understandably just want an answer, just something to blame, for their kids’ autism. What would be your response to that?
Kennedy: They are dismissing the stories of tens of thousands that saw the same thing happen to their children … What are the chances they all made up the same story? … If this is not caused by mercury, then find out what it is and get rid of it.
The Following Video was also CENSORED. Please click the link below to view it:
WARNING: Blue Pill Junkies Should Avoid This Show
California Court of Appeal Rejects Challenge to Vaccine Law
Dorit Reiss, Health Law Policy, Immunization, Vaccines
By Dorit Reiss
The Second Appellate District’s Court of Appeal upheld the California law that removed California’s Personal Belief Exemption (PBE) from school immunization requirements earlier this month.
The decision is a strong endorsement of immunization mandates and is binding on all state courts until another appellate decision is handed down, or the Supreme Court of California addresses the question.
Known as SB277, the vaccine requirements became law in June 2015. Inspired by a large outbreak of measles at Disneyland earlier that year, the law gave California parents a choice: they could vaccinate a child against ten diseases, obtain a medical exemption stating that the child had a medical condition that prevents vaccinating, or keep the child at home and provide education through homeschooling or an independent study.
The law improved California’s immunization rates dramatically, though in some schools unjustified medical exemptions are a problem. Medical exemptions in California have tripled since the passage of SB277; in some schools, the rates of medical exemptions are unexpectedly high. The rate of growth and the distribution of exemptions suggest some doctors have been selling unjustified exemptions – as have online pronouncements by some such doctors. Dr. Bob Sears, recently sanctioned for giving an exemption to a child without checking the records, stated on Facebook that there are several disciplinary cases for unjustified exemptions pending against him.
Still, the overall immunization rate in California increased dramatically.
However, there were a few additional complications. For example, SB277 includes a clause stating that it “does not prohibit a pupil who qualifies for an individualized education program [IEP], pursuant to federal law and Section 56026 of the Education Code, from accessing any special education and related services required by his or her individualized education program.”
Whether this means that students with IEP are exempt from immunization requirements completely, or to a more limited degree, will likely be the subject of litigation at some point because districts interpret the clause differently.
The law was also implemented gradually. Children had to be up to date at checkpoints, when they first entered the system, in kindergarten, and at seventh grade. So, a child who entered seventh grade in 2015 (when the law was signed) could finish school unimmunized, and a child who started kindergarten during that year could stay unvaccinated until seventh grade.
To date, five lawsuits have been filed against the law—two by the same group of plaintiffs with substantially similar arguments, initially in federal court and then in state court. Five trial courts (two state, three federal) have so far rejected these suits. Two of these cases were appealed, and this was the first one decided.
In Brown v. Smith, six plaintiffs (out of an initial group of eight) challenged the law claiming that it was invalid because the state could not constitutionally mandate “unavoidably unsafe” products, and vaccines, they claimed, were very unsafe. It was unconstitutional because it violated their religious freedom as protected by the First Amendment and the California constitution, and it violated their children’s right to education because it violated equal protection. Far less convincingly, the group argued that the law violates a legal prohibition on medical experiments. The court rejected that swiftly.
The Court of Appeal rejected these claims. First, the court pointed out that the plaintiffs, in claiming vaccines were unavoidably unsafe, were mischaracterizing a Supreme Court case, Breuswitz v. Wyeth, from 2011. That case did not, as plaintiffs said, state that vaccines were unavoidably defective and cause “indiscriminate death and injury.” In fact, it emphasized the substantial benefits of vaccines and the risk that undermining immunization programs would lead to children’s deaths. (See also here).
The plaintiffs’ other claims were not more convincing. The court rejected their First Amendment claims, mostly because existing jurisprudence – for example, Phillips v. City of New York (2d Cir. 2015) 775 F.3d 538 and Prince v. Massachusetts (1944) 321 U.S. 158 166-167. In those cases, the courts found that “The right to practice religion freely does not include liberty to expose the community or the child to communicable disease or the latter to ill health or death.”
Even if the First Amendment required strict scrutiny, immunization mandates would stand: preventing communicable diseases is a compelling interest (the court addressed the other prong – least restrictive means – in its discussion of the right to education).
The court found the California constitution’s right to education did not prevent the state from imposing an immunization mandate.
The court’s reasoning here had three parts:
First, the court pointed out that the cases that plaintiffs relied on to claim education as a fundamental right, such as Serrano v. Priest from 1971 (Serrano v. Priest (1971) 5 Cal.3d 584, 608-609), were cases in which California’s supreme court found that the state cannot have a funding system for education – a fundamental interest – that discriminates on the basis of wealth, a suspect classification under California’s constitution (though not the federal constitution). Since there is no such classification at work in SB277, Serrano does not apply.
Second, the court pointed out that SB277 would survive strict scrutiny. As I mentioned, preventing disease outbreaks is a compelling interest. As to the claim that SB277 was not the least restrictive means, the court mentioned that plaintiffs did not specify an alternative means, and then went on to say:
“….compulsory immunization has long been recognized as the gold standard for preventing the spread of contagious diseases. As is noted in the legislative history, studies have found that “when belief exemptions to vaccination guidelines are permitted, vaccination rates decrease,” and community immunity wanes if large numbers of children do not receive required vaccinations.”
This is a strong (and fact-based) endorsement of immunization mandates. The court ended by quoting the conclusion of the first trial court to address SB277 on this point:
“The right of education, fundamental as it may be, is no more sacred than any of the other fundamental rights that have readily given way to a State’s interest in protecting the health and safety of its citizens, and particularly, school children,” and “removal of the [personal beliefs exemption] is necessary or narrowly drawn to serve the compelling objective of SB 277.”
The court rejected plaintiffs’ efforts to claim a violation of equal protection. Plaintiffs went so far as to compare SB277 to Brown v. Board of Education, claiming their children were being segregated. They named several distinctions the law made, including between immunized children and unimmunized ones, children with medical exemptions and those without, different age groups, and so on. But as the court pointed out, not only did plaintiffs not point to any authorities making any of these distinctions suspect, “[t]he statutory classifications and exemptions plaintiffs dispute do not involve similarly situated children, or are otherwise entirely rational classifications.” There is no discrimination when children that are unalike in meaningful ways are treated differently, and it does not violate equal protection.
The court, in short, following in a tradition of over 100 years of jurisprudence, rejected the claims against the immunization mandate. It went further, and strongly endorsed the law for its protection of children and the community. This is a good result for the children of California.
Streamed live on Feb 22, 2019
Continue to: GIFTS FROM THE FALLEN – Part 7