We live in perilous times. There is so much that is working against us. It seems at times that the enemy is winning. But, WE KNOW that GOD is in Control. He warned us about all that was coming. So we can take great comfort in knowing. I am convinced that we are not suffering anything that generation after generation has suffered throughout history. I believe that the same scenario has been playing out over and over again. That way EVERYONE lives through the same trials and testing. That is what I believe.
However, I also believe that we have reached the end of this world as we know it. God did say that in the last days, it would be the WORST TIMES ever. Nothing that went before or that will come after will ever be as bad as what is now at the door. I am pleading with you to get to know HIM. If you know HIM you have nothing to FEAR. GOD will get you through. If you do not know him…you have nothing to hold on to. YOU will be at the mercy of the Fallen.
AI is out of Control. It appears that the elite have been designing AI to become GOD. Follow with me through the following. I hope you come out at the end wiser and more prepared.
DISCLAIMER: In my posts I normally collect a number of written articles and videos related to the topic. I hightlight in red or black the parts of the articles that I think are important to note and try to leave it to the reader to come to their own conclusions. The object is to bring the facts/truths to your attention and cause you to look further into them yourself. Why? Because that is the only way to make the subject real to you. When you view the available information, search it out on your own, hopefully guided by the Holy Spirit, YOUR CONCLUSION is exactly that YOURS. It means something to you. It may be similar to mine or it may be completely different. We are all on our own course and in different places with our spiritual development. I pray that GOD speaks to you in a way that touches you. IF you see notes in green, those are my comments. Anything else, you’ll find the source links on the titles, and the author and date will be below the titles. Just because I post an article or video in my articles, it does not mean that I agree with the author or support their stand. It does mean that I felt there was worthwhile information to be gleaned.
Portrait with digital manipulation Photograph: Liam Norris/Getty Images
After losing her faith, a former evangelical Christian felt adrift in the world. She then found solace in a radical technological philosophy – but its promises of immortality and spiritual transcendence soon seemed unsettlingly familiar.
I first read Ray Kurzweil’s book, The Age of Spiritual Machines, in 2006, a few years after I dropped out of Bible school and stopped believing in God. I was living alone in Chicago’s southern industrial sector and working nights as a cocktail waitress. I was not well. Beyond the people I worked with, I spoke to almost no one. I clocked out at three each morning, went to after-hours bars, and came home on the first train of the morning, my head pressed against the window so as to avoid the spectre of my reflection appearing and disappearing in the blackened glass.
The Kurzweil book belonged to a bartender at the jazz club where I worked. He lent it to me a couple of weeks after I’d seen him reading it and asked him – more out of boredom than genuine curiosity – what it was about. I read the first pages on the train home from work, in the grey and ghostly hours before dawn. (when demons are most active, and being tired and disillusioned, this person was most susceptible.)
“The 21st century will be different,” Kurzweil wrote. “The human species, along with the computational technology it created, will be able to solve age-old problems … and will be in a position to change the nature of mortalityin a postbiological future.”
It’s difficult to account for the totemic power I ascribed to the book. I carried it with me everywhere, tucked in the recesses of my backpack, though I was paranoid about being seen with it in public. It seemed to me a work of alchemyor a secret gospel. It is strange, in retrospect, that I was not more sceptical of these promises. I’d grown up in the kind of millenarian sect ofChristianity where pastors were always throwing out new dates for the Rapture. But Kurzweil’s prophecies seemed different because they were bolstered by science. Moore’s law held that computer processing power doubled every two years, meaning that technology was developing at an exponential rate. Thirty years ago, a computer chip contained 3,500 transistors. Today it has more than 1bn. By 2045, Kurzweil predicted, the technology would be inside our bodies.(Technology is already inside our bodies. Nanotechnology is in our food, our medicine, our water and even the air we breathe.) At that moment, the arc of progress would curve into a vertical line.
Many transhumanists such as Kurzweilcontend that they are carrying on the legacy of the Enlightenment – that theirs is a philosophy grounded in reason and empiricism (Gnosticism), even if they do lapse occasionally into metaphysical language about “transcendence” and “eternal life”. As I read more about the movement, I learned that most transhumanists are atheists who, if they engage at all with monotheistic faith, defer to the familiar antagonisms between science and religion. “The greatest threat to humanity’s continuing evolution,” writes the transhumanist Simon Young, “is theistic opposition to Superbiology in the name of a belief system based on blind faith in the absence of evidence.” (THIS is a LIE, real Science confirms the truth of the BIBLE, real Believers do not walk on blind faith, they walk in faith that is supported by evidence. They are the most awake, aware and knowledgeable people in the world! Followers of Jesus Christ are the ONLY people the devil and his clan cannot deceive. That is why they want us eliminated from his realm. HE HATES BIBLE BELIEVERS)
Yet although few transhumanists would likely admit it, their theories about the future are a secular outgrowth of Christian eschatology.(Most Non-believers refer to the Bible as a reference, have you noticed? Most Pagan religions are based on the Biblical structure.)The word transhuman first appearednot in a work of science or technology but in Henry Francis Carey’s 1814 translation of Dante’s Paradiso, the final book of the Divine Comedy. Dante has completed his journey through paradise and is ascending into the spheres of heaven when his human flesh is suddenly transformed. He is vague about the nature of his new body. “Words may not tell of that transhuman change,” he writes. (So, as in everything the devil does, the transhuman teaching is a perversion of a godly truth. In this instance the resurrection of body and soul, to spiritual life.)
Dante, in this passage, is dramatising the resurrection, the moment when, according to Christian prophecies, the dead will rise from their graves and the living will be granted immortal flesh. The vast majority of Christians throughout the ages have believed that these prophecies would happen supernaturally – God would bring them about, when the time came. But since the medieval period,there has also persisted a tradition of Christians who believed that humanity could enact the resurrection through science and technology.(Science trying to create immortality outside of GOD)The first efforts of this sort were taken up by alchemists. Roger Bacon, a 13th-century friar who is often considered the first western scientist, tried to develop an elixir of life that would mimic the effects of the resurrection as described in Paul’s epistles. (How silly is that? Scientists do not seem like they are very smart to me. They are just driven to prove they don’t need GOD. More importantly they want to prove to you that YOU don’t need GOD.)
The Enlightenment failed to eradicate projects of this sort. If anything, modern science (Modern science isn’t science at all, It is a religion. Scientism.) provided more varied and creative ways for Christians to envision these prophecies. In the late 19th century, a Russian Orthodox ascetic named Nikolai Fedorov was inspired by Darwinism to argue that humans could direct their own evolution to bring about the resurrection. (Resurrection to what? What is the Resurrection, if not to live eternally with GOD?) Up to this point, natural selection had been a random phenomenon, but now, thanks to technology, humans could intervene in this process. Calling on biblical prophecies, he wrote: “This day will be divine, awesome, but not miraculous, for resurrection will be a task not of miracle but of knowledge and common labour.” (and yet, they need the intervention of the AI GOD, which in truth are the Fallen Angels.)
This theory was carried into the 20th century by Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, a French Jesuitpriest and palaeontologist who, like Fedorov, believed that evolution would lead to the Kingdom of God. (wait, what?)In 1949, Teilhard proposed that in the future all machines would be linked to a vast global network that would allow human minds to merge. (You notice that they don’t really give you much by way of describing what that will be like, how it will manifest, what you will experience, how it will feel.)Over time, this unification of consciousness would lead to an intelligence explosion – the “Omega Point”– enabling humanity to “break through the material framework of Time and Space” (only you will no longer be HUMAN, this is a lot of double talk.)and merge seamlessly with the divine.(Wait, I thought they did not accept or want anything to do with GOD/The Creator/YAH so just exactly what divinity are the referencing here? THE god of this WORLD, SATAN, prince of the POWER of the AIR. Isn’t that where the ETHERNET exists?) The Omega Point is an obvious precursor to Kurzweil’s Singularity, but in Teilhard’s mind, it was how the biblical resurrection would take place. Christ was guiding evolution toward a state of glorification so that humanity could finally merge with God in eternal perfection. (Man started out in perfection, God did not allow man to become eternal until He was able to test and see if they were qualified for spiritual eternity. The way to reach resurrection and glorification is to submit to GOD, not science, not AI, not demons, NOT SATAN, who was the cause of your present state and your confinement to TIME.)
Transhumanists have acknowledged Teilhard and Fedorov as forerunners of their movement, but the religious context of their ideas is rarely mentioned.Most histories of the movement attribute the first use of the term transhumanism to Julian Huxley, the British eugenicist (IF you don’t know what a Eugenicist is, you better look it up.) and close friend of Teilhard’s who, in the 1950s, expanded on many of the priest’s ideas in his own writings – with one key exception. Huxley, a secular humanist, believed that Teilhard’s visions need not be grounded in any larger religious narrative. In 1951, he gave a lecture that proposed a non-religious version of the priest’s ideas. “Such a broad philosophy,” he wrote, “might perhaps be called, not Humanism, because that has certain unsatisfactory connotations, but Transhumanism. It is the idea of humanity attempting to overcome its limitations and to arrive at fuller fruition.”
The contemporary iteration of the movement arose in San Francisco in the late 1980samong a band of tech-industry people with a libertarian streak. They initially called themselves Extropians (“evolving framework of values and standards for continuously improving the human condition”. Extropians believe that advances in science and technology will some day let people live indefinitely.) and communicated through newsletters and at annual conferences. Kurzweil was one of the first major thinkers to bring these ideas into the mainstream and legitimise them for a wider audience. His ascent in 2012 to a director of engineering position at Google, heralded, for many, a symbolic merger between transhumanist philosophy and the clout of major technological enterprise. (Now, they had the power of MONEY to drive their agenda)
Transhumanists today wield enormous power in Silicon Valley – entrepreneurs such as Elon Musk and Peter Thielidentify as believers – where they have founded thinktanks such as the Singularity University and the Future of Humanity Institute. The ideas proposed by the pioneers of the movement are no longer abstract theoretical musings but are being embedded into emerging technologies at organisations such as Google, Apple, Tesla and SpaceX.
Losing faith in Godin the 21st century is an anachronistic experience. You end up contending with the kinds of things the west dealt with more than a hundred years ago: materialism, the end of history, the death of the soul. When I think back on that period of my life, what I recall most viscerally is an unnamable sense of dread.There were days I woke in a panic, certain that I’d lost some essential part of myself in the fume of a blackout, and would work my fingers across my nose, my lips, my eyebrows, and my ears until I assured myself that everything was intact. My body had become strange to me; it seemed insubstantial. I went out of my way to avoid subway grates because I believed I could slip through them. One morning, on the train home from work, I became convinced that my flesh was melting into the seat. (These experiences are demonically created and are similar to what many drug addicts experience during the ALTERED STATE of Consciousness.)
At the time, I would have insisted that my rituals of self-abuse – drinking, pills, the impulse to put my body in danger (clear evidence of demonic activity) in ways I now know were deliberate – were merely efforts to escape; that I was contending, however clumsily, with the overwhelming despair at the absence of God. But at least one piece of that despair came from the knowledge that my body was no longer a sacred vessel; that it was not a temple of the holy spirit,formed in the image of God and intended to carry me into eternity; that my body was matter, and any harm I did to it was only aiding the unstoppable process of entropy for which it was destined. (the absence of the Holy Spirit and the power of the blood of Jesus, leaves you open to attack by demons.)
To confront this reality after believing otherwise is to experience perhaps the deepest sense of loss we are capable of as humans. It’s not just about coming to terms with the fact that you will die. It has something to do with suspecting that there is no difference between your human flesh and the plastic seat of the train. It has to do with the inability to watch your reflection appear and vanish in a window without coming to believe you are identical to it.
What makes the transhumanist movement so seductive is that it promises to restore, through science, the transcendent hopes that science itself has obliterated.Transhumanists do not believe in the existence of a soul, but they are not strict materialists, either. Kurzweil claims he is a “patternist”, characterising consciousness as the result of biological processes, “a pattern of matter and energy that persists over time”. These patterns, which contain what we tend to think of as our identity, are currently running on physical hardware – the body – that will one day give out. But they can, at least in theory, be transferred onto supercomputers, robotic surrogates or human clones. A pattern, transhumanists would insist, is not the same as a soul. But it’s not difficult to see how it satisfies the same longing. At the very least, a pattern suggests that there is some essential core of our being that will survive and perhaps transcend the inevitable degradation of flesh.
Of course, mind uploading has spurred all kinds of philosophical anxieties. If the pattern of your consciousness is transferred onto a computer, is the pattern “you” or a simulation of your mind? One camp of transhumanists have argued that true resurrection can happen only if it is bodily resurrection. They tend to favour cryonics and bionics, which promise to resurrect the entire body or else supplement the living form with technologies to indefinitely extend life.
It is perhaps not coincidental that an ideology that grew out of Christian eschatology would come to inherit its philosophical problems. The question of whether the resurrection would be corporeal or merely spiritual was an obsessive point of debate among early Christians. One faction, which included the Gnostic sects, argued that only the soul would survive death; another insisted that the resurrection was not a true resurrection unless it revived the body.
Transhumanists, in their eagerness to preempt charges of dualism, tend to sound an awful lot like these early church fathers. Eric Steinhart, a “digitalist” philosopher at William Paterson University, is among the transhumanists who insist the resurrection must be physical. “Uploading does not aim to leave the flesh behind,” he writes, “on the contrary, it aims at the intensification of the flesh.” The irony is that transhumanists are arguing these questions as though they were the first to consider them. Their discussions give no indication that these debates belong to a theological tradition that stretches back to the earliest centuries of the Common Era.
While the effects of my deconversion were often felt physically, the root causes were mostly cerebral. My doubts began in earnest during my second year at Bible school, after I read The Brothers Karamazov and entertained, for the first time, the problem of how evil could exist in a world created by a benevolent God. In our weekly dormitory prayer groups, my classmates would assure me that all Christians struggled with these questions, but the stakes in my case were higher because I was planning to become a missionary after graduation. I nodded deferentially as my friends supplied the familiar apologetics, but afterward, in the silence of my dorm room, I imagined myself evangelising a citizen of some remote country and crumbling at the moment she pointed out those theological contradictions I myself could not abide or explain.
I knew other people who had left the church, and was amazed at how effortlessly they had seemed to cast off their former beliefs. Perhaps I clung to the faith because, despite my doubts, I found – and still find – the fundamental promises of Christianity beautiful, particularly the notion that human existence ultimately resolves into harmony. What I could not reconcile was the idea that an omnipotent and benevolent God could allow for so much suffering.
Transhumanism offered a vision of redemption without the thorny problems of divine justice. It was an evolutionary approach to eschatology, one in which humanity took it upon itself to bring about the final glorification of the body and could not be blamed if the path to redemption was messy or inefficient. Within months of encountering Kurzweil, I became totally immersed in transhumanist philosophy. By this point, it was early December and the days had grown dark. The city was besieged by a series of early winter storms, and snow piled up on the windowsills, silencing the noise outside. I increasingly spent my afternoons at the public library, researching things like nanotechnology and brain-computer interfaces.
Once, after following link after link, I came across a paper called “Are You Living in a Computer Simulation?” It was written by the Oxford philosopher and transhumanist Nick Bostrom, who used mathematical probability to argue that it’s “likely” that we currently reside in a Matrix-like simulation of the past created by our posthuman descendants. Most of the paper consisted of esoteric calculations, but I became rapt when Bostrom started talking about the potential for an afterlife. If we are essentially software, he noted, then after we die we might be “resurrected” in another simulation. Or we could be “promoted” by the programmers and brought to life in base reality. The theory was totally naturalistic – all of it was possible without any appeals to the supernatural – but it was essentially an argument for intelligent design. “In some ways,” Bostrom conceded, “the posthumans running a simulation are like gods in relation to the people inhabiting the simulation”.
One afternoon, deep in the bowels of an online forum, I discovered a link to a cache of “simulation theology” – articles written by fans of Bostrom’s theory. According to the “Argument for Virtuous Engineers”, it was reasonable to assume that our creators were benevolent because the capacity to build sophisticated technologies required “long-term stability” and “rational purposefulness”. These qualities could not be cultivated without social harmony, and social harmony could be achieved only by virtuous beings. The articles were written by software engineers, programmers and the occasional philosopher.
The deeper I got into the articles, the more unhinged my thinking became. One day, it occurred to me: perhaps God was the designer and Christ his digital avatar, and the incarnation his way of entering the simulation to share tips about our collective survival as a species. Or maybe the creation of our world was a competition, a kind of video game in which each participating programmer invented one of the world religions, sent down his own prophet-avatar and received points for every new convert.
By this point I’d passed beyond idle speculation. A new, more pernicious thought had come to dominate my mind: transhumanist ideas were not merely similar to theological concepts but could in fact be the events described in the Bible. It was only a short time before my obsession reached its culmination. I got out my old study Bible and began to scan the prophetic literature for signs of the cybernetic revolution. I began to wonder whether I could pray to beings outside the simulation. I had initially been drawn to transhumanism because it was grounded in science. In the end, I became consumed with the kind of referential mania and blind longing that animates all religious belief.
I’ve since had to distance myself from prolonged meditation on these topics. People who once believed, I have been told, are prone to recidivism. Over the past decade, as transhumanism has become the premise of Hollywood blockbusters and a passable topic of small talk among people under 40, I’ve had to excuse myself from conversations, knowing that any mention of simulation theory or the noosphere can send me spiralling down that techno-theological rabbit hole.
Last spring, a friend of mine from Bible school, a fellow apostate, sent me an email with the title “robot evangelism”. “I seem to recall you being into this stuff,” he said. There was a link to an episode of The Daily Show that had aired a year ago. The video was a satirical report by the correspondent Jordan Klepper called “Future Christ”, in which a Florida pastor, Christopher Benek, argued that in the future, AI could be evangelisedjust like humans. The interview had been heavily edited, and it wasn’t really clear what Benek believed, except that robots might one day be capable of spiritual life, an idea that failed to strike me as intrinsically absurd. (Robots are not redeemable, they are not human, they do not have a spirit -other than the spirit of the fallen/demon that animates it. The fallen and their offspring are not redeemable. They are already condemned by GOD.)
I Googled Benek. He had studied to be a pastor at Princeton Theological Seminary, one of the most prestigious in the country. He described himself in his bio as a “techno-theologian, futurist, ethicist, Christian Transhumanist, public speaker and writer”. He also chaired the board of something called the Christian Transhumanism Association. I followed a link to the organisation’s website, which included that peculiar quote from Dante: “Words cannot tell of that transhuman change.” (They can call themselves anything they want, it will not save them. There is no Transhuman theology that will qualify you for heaven. No true believer in the Word of God can be associated with any organization that seeks eternal life outside of GOD’s plan of redemption.)
All this seemed unlikely. Was it possible there were now Christian Transhumanists? (NO) Actual believers who thought the Kingdom of God would come about through the Singularity? (NO)I had thought I was alone in drawing these parallels between transhumanism and biblical prophecy, but the convergences seemed to have gained legitimacy from the pulpit. How long would it be before everyone noticed the symmetry of these two ideologies – before Kurzweil began quoting the Gospel of John and Bostrom was read alongside the minor prophets?
A few months later, I met with Benek at a cafe across the street from his church in Fort Lauderdale. In my email to him, I’d presented my curiosity as journalistic, unable to admit – even to myself – what lay behind my desire to meet.
He arrived in the same navy blazer he had worn for The Daily Show interview and appeared nervous. The Daily Show had been a disaster, he told me. He had spoken with them for an hour about the finer points of his theology, but the interview had been cut down to his two-minute spiel on robots – something he insisted he wasn’t even interested in, it was just a thought experiment he had been goaded into. “It’s not like I spend my days speculating on how to evangelise robots,” he said.
I explained that I wanted to know whether transhumanist ideas were compatible with Christian eschatology. Was it possible that technology would be the avenue by which humanity achieved the resurrection and immortality? I worried that the question sounded a little deranged, but Benek appeared suddenly energised. It turned out he was writing a dissertation on precisely this subject.
“Technology has a role in the process of redemption,” he said. (NOT)Christians today assume the prophecies about bodily perfection and eternal life are going to be realised in heaven. But the disciples understood those prophecies as referring to things that were going to take place here on Earth. Jesus had spoken of the Kingdom of God as a terrestrial domain, albeit one in which the imperfections of earthly existence were done away with. This idea, he assured me, was not unorthodox; it was just old.
I asked Benek about humility. Wasn’t it all about the fallen nature of the flesh and our tragic limitations as humans?
“Sure,” he said. He paused a moment, as though debating whether to say more. Finally, he leaned in and rested his elbows on the table, his demeanour markedly pastoral, and began speaking about the transfiguration and the nature of Christ. Jesus, he reminded me, was both fully human and fully God. What was interesting, he said, was that science had actually verified the potential for matter to have two distinct natures. Superposition, a principle in quantum theory, suggests that an object can be in two places at one time. A photon could be a particle, and it could also be a wave. It could have two natures. “When Jesus tells us that if we have faith nothing will be impossible for us, I think he means that literally.”
By this point, I had stopped taking notes. It was late afternoon, and the cafe was washed in amber light. Perhaps I was a little dehydrated, but Benek’s ideas began to make perfect sense. This was, after all, the promise implicit in the incarnation: that the body could be both human and divine, that the human form could walk on water. “Very truly I tell you,” Christ had said to his disciples, “whoever believes in me will do the works I have been doing, and they will do even greater things than these.” His earliest followers had taken this promise literally. Perhaps these prophecies had pointed to the future achievements of humanity all along, our ability to harness technology to become transhuman. Christ had spoken mostly in parables – no doubt for good reason. If a superior being had indeed come to Earth to prophesy the future to 1st-century humans, he would not have wasted time trying to explain modern computing or sketching the trajectory of Moore’s law on a scrap of papyrus. He would have said, “You will have a new body,” and “All things will be changed beyond recognition,” and “On Earth as it is in heaven.” Perhaps only now that technologies were emerging to make such prophecies a reality could we begin to understand what Christ meant about the fate of our species.
I could sense my reason becoming loosened by the lure of these familiar conspiracies. Somewhere, in the pit of my stomach, it was amassing: the fevered, elemental hope that the tumult of the world was authored and intentional, that our profound confusion would one day click into clarity and the broken body would be restored. Part of me was still helpless against the pull of these ideas.
It was late. The cafe had emptied and a barista was sweeping near our table. As we stood to go, I felt that our conversation was unresolved. I suppose I’d been hoping that Benek would hand me some portal back to the faith, one paved by the certitude of modern science. But if anything had become clear to me, it was my own desperation, my willingness to spring at this largely speculative ideology that offered a vestige of that first religious promise.I had disavowed Christianity, and yet I had spent the past 10 years hopelessly trying to re-create its visions by dreaming about our postbiological future – a modern pantomime of redemption. What else could lie behind this impulse but the ghost of that first hope? Main photograph by Liam Norris/Getty Images
DECEPTION IS RAMPANT IN THESE LAST DAYS. But, God warned us that it would. EVERYTHING that the Bible predicted has come or is coming to pass. That should give all of us comfort.
Spacer
If she knew GOD, she would have comfort.
THERE is NOTHING random about GOD. He is a very deliberate being. He ALWAYS has a PLAN. For the WORLD, FOR SALVATION, FOR YOUR LIFE. He is perfect in all His ways and CHANGES NOT. He does not need constant readjusting and recalculating. He has no imperfections that need to be addressed. No personality failings or issues. HE IS NOT HUMAN. HE is GOD! ONLY HE knows the end from the beginning. EVERY SINGLE thing that HE declares will come to Pass. NO DOUBT ABOUT IT. And God was not waiting for AI to be developed in order to accomplish HIS WILL. That is ABSURD! GOD has a plan and He has a TIME for EVERYTHING. In GOD’s TIME you will see HIS Salvation. You will see how He wraps everything up. Believe me, there will be no one to argue with HIM. EVERYONE will know that they got, what they deserved. No One will be able to call HIM unjust.
Isaiah 46: 8-10
8Remember this, and shew yourselves men: bring it again to mind, O ye transgressors. 9Remember the former things of old: for I am God, and there is none else; I am God, and there is none like me,10 Declaring the end from the beginning, and from ancient times the things that are not yet done, saying, My counsel shall stand, and I will do all my pleasure:
John 13:19 & 20 19 Now I tell you before it come, that, when it is come to pass, ye may believe that I am he.20Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that receiveth whomsoever I send receiveth me; and he that receiveth me receiveth him that sent me.
John 14:25-30
25 These things have I spoken unto you, being yet present with you. 26 But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you.27 Peace I leave with you, my peace I give unto you: not as the world giveth, give I unto you.Let not your heart be troubled, neither let it be afraid. 28 Ye have heard how I said unto you, I go away, and come again unto you.If ye loved me, ye would rejoice, because I said, I go unto the Father: for my Father is greater than I. 29 And now I have told you before it come to pass, that, when it is come to pass, ye might believe. 30 Hereafter I will not talk much with you: for the prince of this world cometh, and hath nothing in me.
spacer
In the following video you will learn more about the Satanic Cabal that is planning to bring in the New Millennium their way using AI/Transhumanism. You will find connections between the Media Industry and this agenda. You will learn why we are suddenly seeing the term IAM everywhere. It has become a huge advertising gimmick. spacer
In this weeks show I chat with Wayne Mcroy who is the author on one of the best books about artificial intelligence and quantum computersout at the moment. His book “The Alchemical Tech Revolution” details how the satanic cult (Sabbatean?) that is running our world right now plans to use technology to realise an Agenda for a One World Order from the Middle East.
Using Quantum Mechanics and CERN technologies, Wayne’s research is a detailed study on how technology, 5G and A.I will be used in conjunction with a new Solomons Temple in Jerusalem. Going back thousands of years there has been a plot to invert the Hermetic Laws and inline with a Satanic Cultthat comprises some of the biggest names in the world, including Prime Ministers, Presidents, Big Pharma, Big Tech and of course the Private Banking bloodlines and Royalty.
The belief is that once the new Solomons Temple is built on Temple Mount in Jerusalem then the Messiah will return to earth and take up those who have followed him/her in The Rapture, whilst the 7 year war wipes the rest of us off the earth. Once the war is over they will return to earth and live with their Messiah for a 1,000 years in a New World Order and Heaven on Earth. They plan to bring this about using the technologybeing pushed out today, and the disturbing quantum computers being tested in CERN with all its Satanic Symbology. This is also seen in Christian Zionism and it appears that Donald Trump may believe he has a big part to play in this.
In the video you will hear about the esoteric agendas from the ancients and how the elite are using technology to complete the final stages of “THE WORK” that has been in process for thousands of years. You will hear about the Dangers of Vaccines in general, and the real purpose of the Current Vaccine Agenda. IT is all about TOTAL CONTROL of the MASSES. It is about the ruling ELITE becoming gods. That should not be a surprise to you, they have been declaring for years that they ARE BECOMING GODS and anyone who tries to stand in their way will be killed. You will also get an idea of how 5G is tied into the Vaccines. I believe the Vaccine will introduce the nano bacteria into your body that will then be controlled by the Technocrats. They are very excited that they have created controllable bacteria, that are merely tiny computers that can be inserted into your body and controlled by them.
To view the following Video on BitCHUTE:CLICK HERE
Published on: 12 April 2019 Last updated on: 20 April 2019
A future ‘human brain/cloud interface’ will give people instant access to vast knowledge via thought alone, experts predict.
Imagine a future technology that would provide instant access to the world’s knowledge and artificial intelligence,simply by thinkingabout a specific topic or question. Communications, education, work, and the world as we know it would be transformed.
Writing in Frontiers in Neuroscience, an international collaboration led by researchers at UC Berkeley and the US Institute for Molecular Manufacturing predicts that exponential progress in nanotechnology, nanomedicine, AI, and computation will lead this century to the development of a ‘human brain/cloud interface’ (B/CI), that connects brain cells to vast cloud-computing networks in real time.
Nanobots on the brain
The B/CI concept was initially proposed by futurist-author-inventor Ray Kurzweil, who suggested that neural nanorobots – brainchild of Robert Freitas, Jr, senior author of the research – could be used to connect the neocortex of the human brain to a ‘synthetic neocortex’ in the cloud. Our wrinkled neocortex is the newest, smartest, ‘conscious’ part of the brain. (so, every thought will be in the cloud, where it is accessible forever, under the control of AI. Wow, does that really sound like a good idea to you? I don’t even like to upload ANYTHING of mine to the cloud. Though they automatically take your documents/photos etc. now, without your consent. They have already stated that they cannot control AI, computers are already smarter than our smartest humans. They communicate with each other now in language we cannot even decipher. DO YOU FEEL COMFORTABLE WITH THAT?)
Freitas’ proposed neural nanorobots would provide direct, real-time monitoring and control of signals to and from brain cells. (So, they not only have access to what you think, but they can put things into your mind, they can control your bodily functions, they can make your heart beat or stop beating. They can affect your breathing or they can make it CEASE!)
‘These devices would navigate the human vasculature, cross the blood-brain barrier, and precisely autoposition themselves among, or even within brain cells,’explains Freitas. ‘They would then wirelessly transmit encoded information to and from a cloud-based supercomputer network for real-time brain-state monitoring and data extraction.’ Researchers Predict Matrix Style Internet of Thought
The internet of thoughts
This cortex in the cloud would allow ‘Matrix-style’ downloading of information to the brain, the group claims.
‘A human B/CI system mediated by neuralnanoroboticscould empower individuals with instantaneous access to all cumulative human knowledge available in the cloud, while significantly improving human learning capacities and intelligence,’ says lead author Dr Nuno Martins.
B/CI technology might also allow us to create a future ‘global superbrain’ that would connect networks of individual human brains and AIs to enable collective thought. (No room for individuality or privacy.)
‘While not yet particularly sophisticated, an experimental human “BrainNet” system has already been tested, enabling thought-driven information exchange via the cloud between individual brains,’ explains Martins. ‘It used electrical signals recorded through the skull of “senders” and magnetic stimulation through the skull of “receivers”, allowing for performing cooperative tasks.
B/CI technology might also allow us to create a future ‘global superbrain’.
‘With the advance of neuralnanorobotics, we envisage the future creation of “superbrains” that can harness the thoughts and thinking power of any number of humans and machines in real time. This shared cognition could revolutionise democracy, enhance empathy, and ultimately unite culturally diverse groups into a truly global society.’ (How can they claim that it will enhance empathy, when they know that AI has no concern for humans, and we know that the elite have no concern for the masses, and we KNOW that the demonic forces behind this technology HATES HUMANS. They come to steal, kill and destroy! Are we so stupid as to believe that once they have us under their TOTAL CONTROL that any of those entities will suddenly care about us, become empathetic or even sympathetic toward us. I am not that STUPID, I hope you are not either.)
When can we connect?
According to the group’s estimates, even existing supercomputers have processing speeds capable of handling the necessary volumes of neural data for B/CI – and they’re getting faster, fast.
Rather, transferring neural data to and from supercomputers in the cloud is likely to be the ultimate bottleneck in B/CI development.
‘This challenge includes not only finding the bandwidth for global data transmission,’ cautions Martins, ‘but also, how to enable data exchange with neurons via tiny devices embedded deep in the brain.’ Thoughts on Big Data and the Internet of Things
One solution proposed by the authors is the use of ‘magnetoelectric nanoparticles’ to effectively amplify communication between neurons and the cloud.
‘These nanoparticles have been used already in living mice to couple external magnetic fields to neuronal electric fields– that is, to detect and locally amplify these magnetic signals and so allow them to alter the electrical activity of neurons,’explains Martins. ‘This could work in reverse, too: electrical signals produced by neurons and nanorobots could be amplified via magnetoelectric nanoparticles, to allow their detection outside of the skull.’
Getting these nanoparticles – and nanorobots – safely into the brain via the circulation, would be perhaps the greatest challenge of all in B/CI.
‘A detailed analysis of the biodistribution and biocompatibility of nanoparticles is required before they can be considered for human development. Nevertheless, with these and other promising technologies for B/CI developing at an ever-increasing rate, an “internet of thoughts” could become a reality before the turn of the century,’ Martins concludes. (Oh, they expect to have it completed much much sooner than that.)
spacer
To be able to regulate the internet, we need to understand the programs that manage how it works and what it does. Shutterstock
Yet, the technocrats will tell you…they have no idea how AI works. Once the data is fed into it…AI is a mystery. They have no CONTROL over it. spacer
A daemonis early computer slang. (which should tell you, they knew from the beginning that they were connecting to demonic entities through technology.) In the first computer labs, daemons meant the programs running in the background, doing the invisible work of keeping systems online. The word came from Maxwell’s demon,a 19th-century thought experiment that imagined a supernatural creature capable of bringing order to the world;this inspired generations of scientists to try to make daemons real.
‘Internet Daemons: Digital communications possessed’ received the Canadian Communication Association’s 2019 Gertrude J. Robinson Book Prize.University of Minnesota Press
My open-access book, Internet Daemons: Digital communications possessed, explores the daemons that keep the Internet connected. But daemons — and other computer programs — do much more than transmit information. Here, I want to connect my intensive focus on internet daemons to extensive ways that computing orders and optimizes life today.
Daemons are integralto understanding contemporary concerns over smart city projects like Google’s Sidewalk Labs in Torontoand recent attention to surveillance capitalism. To address these recent matters ofalgorithmic regulation, we need to understand the long history of internet daemons and their ensuing policy problems.
By embedding computers in its infrastructure, ARPANET mandated daemons to better manage our communications.Daemons were a collective intelligence distributed across the ARPANETand in constant contact with each other and early users. Their collective intelligence optimized the flows of information on the ARPANET. (Is it possible that some of the elite have already merged with AI? Well, certainly their body, soul and minds have been possessed by the demons in the machine.)
ARPANET established that daemons could indeed better manage communications and that an optimal network would be solved through their coordination. As ARPANET turned into our home internet, these theoretical challenges became public ones, left for internet service providers to solve. (So, they feel that just by using their internet we have surrendered our computer life to the ARPANET. That is why we now have so little control over what is downloaded to our computer, and/or what is uploaded to the “CLOUD”. When we first started using PC computers, we were given the impression that we maintained some control, and our privacy. This has disappeared.) Computer Networks – The Heralds of Resource Sharing
‘Computer Networks: The Heralds of Resource Sharing’ is a 1972 documentary about ARPANET.
5G, the term for next-generation wireless service, will raise these issues all over again. 5G requires even more daemonic intelligence to manage the complexity of sending its radio signals and allows service providers to prioritize signals so some applications preform better than others. This is a problem, because public policy makershardly understand the work of daemons today and will certainly lack proper oversight of the next-generation daemons necessary for 5G.
The problem of optimization, however, is not just a telecommunications issue.
Governance through optimization
Internet daemons optimize how computers actively manage systems toward certain goals or highest-efficency states. Optimization is another way to understand algorithmic governance. It is at once a way of thinking and a way of doing. To optimize is to calculate optimal states that solve social and political problems. Optimization also involves ways to actualize these states. Daemons are just one kind of optimization that has developed in the history of computing.
By understanding the particular work of daemons, we can begin to discern how pervasive optimization is today.Shutterstock
The coming pandaemonium
Daemonic optimization became a template for digital platforms. Today, daemons (and other programs like them) are everywhere.Embedded in our screens, apps and smartphones, their nudges, rankings and interventions influence our behaviours and our social activities.
Optimization has moved beyond networked communications and is being applied to approach social problems. Googleadmitted as much in a 2016 internal thought experiment called Selfish Ledgerthat speculated how global problems — like health or climate change — could be solved by phones and other networked devicestuned to monitor and optimize human activity. (Well, you know what that means. That means that they MUST GET NANOBOTS into every single living soul, in order to monitor health and climate. What better way to get them into EVERY ONE than to DEMAND TOTAL COMPLIANCE WITH VACCINATION? Vaccines which contain not only the nanobots, but the monitoring system. the tracking device, and the kill switch.)
Google functions as what I imagine as a global operating system, a distributed intelligence able to steer individuals toward its goals through nudges and other cues in our phones and other devices. It depend on daemons to link, standardize, mediate, secure and manage the flows of information.
Now, we are caught between competing operating systems run by Google, Amazon, Microsoft, Tencent and, to a lesser degree, Facebook. The power of optimizationis too much to be left in the hands of a few companies.
In user design, dark patterns refer to interfaces that trick people into making bad decisions.We see dark patterns everyday: for example, when we click a pop-up ad accidentally because it looked like a window on our computer or we are unable to uninstall an app because the “close window” button is hidden. These same technologies could optimize for addiction, anxiety or confusion.
Daemons illuminate the power of technological control today.Facing our daemons might be the first step in bringing optimizations under democratic control through better public oversight of daemons and regulatory institutions capable of deciding what’s optimal and holding these systems accountable. (ya, good luck with that. It is too late for that. NO ONE can control AI anymore. It has gone to far.)
spacer
Not only were computers set up to be managed and run by DEMONS, but the first mass marketing of Home PC’s was done by a company called GATEWAY, and their computers were called GATEWAY computers. Why? Because they were a GATEWAY for the DEMONS to enter you and/or your home. Gateways are VERY IMPORTANT in spiritual matters. And the screen on your computer is really as scrying mirror through with you view/or open their PORTALs A portal is known as a doorway, gate, or other entrance, especially a large and imposing one. A web portal is a specially designed website that brings information from diverse sources, like emails, online forums and search engines, together in a uniform way. And YES, the internet is the WORLD WIDE WEB! In which the demons entrap you.
spacer
The secret to success in battle is to identify your enemy. To know for certain who you are fighting. Then you must get to know how that enemy works. Know the way they think and how they operate. What motivates them?
The world have keept this hidden from us since the dawn of time! The Devil is real and he doesn’t want you to know this. Speaker: David Pawson Outro Music: Where I Belong-Building 429
spacer
In this next video we will look at how the ruling elite are attempting to hijack God’s plan for the redemption of mankind and create their own version of the end through technology.
TransHumanism Part 2 The Digital Messiah/ What the ELITE want! Link to Part 1: Mark of the Beast: Link to Part 3: Preparing for the Singularity: Other videos you might like: The Worst All Videos,Music,Documentaries and more at:
spacer
In this next video, from 2014, they talk about the singularity being reached when computer surpass human intelligence and begin to recreate themselves. Well, according to scientists we are there. Computers are already creating new versions AI is already smarter than mankind. Now, AI is not just a tool used in laboratories by scientists, or the military. AI is intricately involved in every area of our lives. AI RULES the world.
I have not included this next article in its entirety as written. If want to read the whole document click the title. I did include this information even though it is out of date, because there were helpful bits to glean from it.
The Singularity is another quasi-spiritual idea that believes an AI will become smarter than humans at some point. You might laugh at the notion of an AI being so powerful that humans bow down to worship it, but several experts who talked to VentureBeat argue that the idea is a lot more feasible than you might think.
One of the experts is Vince Lynch, who started a company calledIV.AI that builds custom AI for the enterprise. Lynch explained howthere are some similarities between organized religion and how an AI actually works. In the Bible used by Christians, for example, Lynch says there are many recurring themes, imagery, and metaphors.
“Teaching humans about religious education is similar to the way we teach knowledge to machines: repetition of many examples that are versions of a concept you want the machine to learn,”he says. “There is also commonality between AI and religion in the hierarchical structure of knowledge understanding found in neural networks. The concept of teaching a machine to learn … and then teaching it to teach … (or write AI) isn’t so different from the concept of a holy trinityor a being achieving enlightenment after many lessons learned with varying levels of success and failure.”
Indeed, Lynch even shared a simple AI model to make his point. If you type in multiple verses from the Christian Bible, you can have the AI write a new verse that seems eerily similar. (So, they have been playing with this practice… is that why we suddenly have so many versions of the Bible, which are so misleading? Is that why we have what has come to be known as the Mandela Effect where the bible verses have been changed, even in their original printing? ) Here’s one an AI wrote: “And let thy companies deliver thee; but will with mine own arm save them: even unto this land, from the kingdom of heaven.” An AI that is all-powerful in the next 25-50 years could decide to write a similar AI bible for humans to follow,one that matches its own collective intelligence. It might tell you what to do each day, or where to travel, or how to live your life. (Is that there goal? Is that what they are training AI to do, to replace GOD? To rewrite the Bible? To steal the worship of GOD for itself?)
Robbee Minicola, who runs a digital agency and an AI services company in Seattle,agreed that an all-knowing AI could appear to be worthy of worship, especially since the AI has some correlations to how organized religion works today. The AI would understand how the world works at a higher level than humans, and humans would trust that this AI would provide the information we need for our daily lives. It would parse this information for us and enlighten us in ways that might seem familiar to anyone who practices religion, such as Christianity.
“[For a Christian] one kind of large data asset pertaining to God is the Old and New Testament,” she says. “So, in terms of expressing machine learning algorithms over the Christian Bible to ascertain communicable insights on ‘what God would do’ or ‘what God would say’ — you might just be onto something here. In terms of extending what God would do way back then to what God would do today — you may also have something there.”
The dark side
Of course, any discussion about an AI god leads quickly to some implications about what this “god” would look like and whether we would actually decide to worship it. Some of the implications are troubling because, as humans, we do have a tendency to trust in things beyond our own capacity(that is a secret that the elite employ, they hold information from us, to keep us under control. They expect us to trust and obey them because they have more knowledge.)— e.g., driving in a major city using GPS and trusting we will arrive safely, as opposed to actually knowing where we want to drive and trusting our instincts. (I hate GPS and refuse to use it, except in an emergency. I prefer to use maps and landmarks.)
And, if an AI god is in total control, you have to wonder what it might do. The “bible” might contain a prescription for how to serve the AI god. We might not even know that the AI god we are serving is primarily trying to wipe us off the face of the planet.
Part of the issue is related to how an AI actually works. From a purely technical standpoint, the experts I talked to found it hard to envision an AI god that can think in creative ways. An AI is programmed only to do a specific task. They wondered how an AI could jump from being a travel chatbot into dictating how to live.
And the experts agreed that actual compassion or serving as part of an organized religion — activities that are essential to faith — go far beyond basic intellectual pursuit. There’s a mystery to religion, a divine component that is not 100 percent based on what we can perceive or know. This transcendence is the part where an AI will have the most difficulty, even in the far future. (This information is out of date. The AI and even robots today, are already demonstrating they are capable of emotion, and self awareness. Certainly, they are capable of creativity. They have created their own way of communicating with each other, and they are already creating new AI and new robots on their own.)
Vincent Jacques runs a company called ChainTradethat uses AI to analyze blockchain. It’s hyper-focused machine learning — the AI enforces anti-money laundering statutes. That’s obviously a long way from an AI that can tell you how to live your life or read an AI bible.
“It would be extremely dangerous to have an all-knowing, thinking AI being someday,” says Jacques. “All computer programs, including AI programs, are built for a specific and narrow purpose: win a chess game, win a go game, reduce an electricity bill etc. The computer logic, even if it is advanced AI, doesn’t play well with a general will and general thinking capability that could at the same time design military strategies, (Our military strategies are currently controlled by AI. Jade HELM was an excercise that tested and proved that capability.)marketing strategies, and learn how to play chess from scratch. For this reason, I’m not really scared of a potential super-thinker that could overthrow us one day — I believe that the inventive and innovative part will always be missing.” (Well, this guy has been proven to be in error. AI has far surpassed mankind.)
For her part, Minicola argues that an AI may be able to guide people and enlighten them in an intellectual way, but this is not the same as an actual expression of faith or any form of transcendence. “In terms of AI taking on God and manifesting something beyond data that simply does not exist, or rather beyond God — that’s not happening,” she says.
Actual worship, though?
In my view, this is where the dangers come into play. As a Christian myself, it’s hard to imagine ever worshiping a bot that lacks any real personality, wisdom, or ability to become relevant and personal, no matter how much more intelligent it is than any human. An AI god would be cold and impersonal, an intellectual “being” that’s not capable of love or emotion.
Will people actually worship the AI god?The answer is obvious — they will.We tend to trust and obey things that seem more powerful and worthy than ourselves. The GPS in your car is just the most obvious example. But we also trust Alexa and Cortana; we trust Google.When an AI becomes much more powerful,in 25 to 50 years,there is a great possibility that it will be deified in some way.(Apple and Google loyalists already have a religious fervor.)
If an AI god does emerge, and people do start worshiping it, there will be many implications about how this AI will need to be regulated … or even subdued. Hang on for the ride. SOURCE
Dan Luvisi Dieu Hex Soleil Abstract Wallpaper / DAN LUVISI
Intolerance, crusades, national differences, terrorism and interpersonal disagreements – all those to some extent resulted from conflicting religious views. (Those are all works/manifestations of demonic influences, but they want to blame them on belief in GOD. The DEVIL is a liar and the FATHER of LIES.)
What about the lack of a religious belief? A major emergent trend of the last century came not from religious teachings but from the Scientific Enlightenment and hard data.
As of 2010, Christianity was by far the world’s largest religion, with an estimated 2.2 billion adherents, nearly a third (31 percent) of all 6.9 billion people on Earth,” a Pew report says. “Islam was second, with 1.6 billion adherents, or 23 percent of the global population.”
Scientific progress, and Internet and mobile coverage proliferation in the last 8 years alone might have decreased the numbers dramatically. Still not as much as to liquidate the spiritual beliefs of the vast majority of the world’s population.
So, the fact is this: technological progress as it is will take time and generations of change to convert the world’s population from monotheistic religions to transhumanism. (clearly that is the goal of the scientific community. So, it is in their best interest to not only make Faith in GOD look ridiculous and evil, but faith in AI to be the solution.)
Why has religion settled so deeply in the minds of our compatriots? What has enabled us to elevate the individuality of the human soul and proclaim our dominance on Planet Earth? (Knowledge of GOD, is deep in the recesses of the human psyche and cannot ever be erased no matter how hard they have tried throughout the millennia. We have a collect subconscious memory of our relationship with GOD that was broken.)
The simple answer is – consciousness. Religious postulates state that while other creatures might have urges and emotions, only humans have this magic spark of “God’s breath.” The existence of consciousness is exactly what has given grounds to the ephemeral concept of the human soul as well as validated our right to shape the Planet to our liking.
One can argue against our exclusivity for consciousness, but the truth is we still cannot evaluate the presence of such in other sentient creatures.
What about machines? Can a machine think, feel or exhibit consciousness?
Turing, who is considered a Father of Artificial Intelligence, believed this question to betoo meaningless to even deserve discussion.
We have been excited with the Turing Test since its inception, and the iconic status of “Blade Runner,” “Her” and “Ex-Machina” clearly suggest humanity’s fascination with the idea of machines exhibiting human-level intelligence. The Turing Test, however, never intended to prove machines are as smart as human beings. It was designed to showcase how well a machine can disguise as a human in a narrow conversation. While definitely an ambitious undertaking, “the imitation game” has nothing in common with our hope to create a new intelligent species.
Creation of an “artificial soul” and true reasoning will not be an attempt to pass the Turing Test. It will aim to pass the test for God. (and there you go, that has been their intent all along. They are creating what they desire to be AI GOD. Actually, it is much more likely that the AI DEMONS are driving this desire. Afterall that is what Satan wanted from the beginning…to replace GOD.)
Our ability to create a soul in silico will be a litmus test for thousands of years of religious preachings, beliefs of millions of people and the strength of the biggest human institution – the Church. It would be an ultimate and non-disputable triumph of Scientific Revolution. Equally, belief in the higher spirit will be strengthened if AGI turns out to be a programmer’s fantasy.
Quest for consciousness
Monotheistic religions claim there is some God-bestowed sacred element in us. All this talk about spirituality, 21 grams, and an eternal life where our souls gather after departing the physical boundaries of our mortal body – these are all beautiful myths of religious folklore. (Just because they say so. Scientists have extremely great egos!)
What is consciousness then? What is this element that enabled us to become the Masters of the Planet?
What is this cornerstone of life that DARPA, Google and IBM are trying to explain, uncover and replicate?
Looked at from a neuroscientific point of view our consciousness is nothing more than the complex pattern of neurons firing inside our brains, while our identity and memory is a direct consequence of the strengths of our neurons’ links. (That is all their great minds can discern from all their years and billions of dollars studying our brains and dissecting them, shocking them, probing them… so sad.)
Taking this approach, our soul appears to be made of a combination of electric signals and the number of connections inside our brains.
If this is the case and consciousness is a matter-embedded phenomenon, knowledge engineers should have no problems reverse engineering the brain, especially accounting for the advances in computing power and the speed of transistors. (I guess this is what keeps driving them to make bigger, faster, more networked computers.)
The nervous system of the C. elegans worm was completely mapped in 1986. Scientists in Edinburgh university have just recreated an elaborate map of more than a billion brain cell connections called synaptome. Maybe it will take only a decade to precisely map the human brain!
The parallel processing nature of our brain has been developed by millions of years of evolution, and a computer’s ability to use the same wire thousands of times per second might very well be enough to approach human “thinking mechanism.”
Or will it not? Will the hard wiring be enough to recreate a sacred human spirit?
Will the sheer power of computing and the size of a simulated brain be sufficient to jump-start a hitherto now mysterious processes of love, hope, ambition, belonging, creativity, fear, lust and curiosity?
It will be, according to numerous machine learning experts,knowledge engineers and sci-fi authors.
The question is: will AGI have consciousness? Will it live by the same principles and desires we do?Will it have to do so to be intelligent?
Whatever the answers, if we ourselves can create an artificial soul in silicon matter, the concept of a divine spark in our souls will give way to evolutionary Darwinism once and for all. (they here admit that they have no proof of Darwin’s lies.)
It will be exactly the answer to the consciousness quest that will end the centuries-old debate on the existence of God.
