HOW MANY DATA CENTERS DOES IT TAKE TO BUILD A WORLD WITH NO HUMANS?

 

UNBELIEVABLE Mega Engineering, How China BUILDS So Fast, World Records Construction Speed Unbelievable Mega Engineering, 10 Storey building in 28 hours, World Record Construction Speed

spacer

 

The yard of a house in Chesapeake, Va., displays a sign opposing the construction of data centers. Ryan Murphy/WHRO

CESAPEAKE, Va. — The two dozen or so nondescript gray, white and blue buildings lining Virginia State Route 625 could be large warehouses.

But community activist Elena Schlossberg can identify them literally a mile away by their telltale rows of backup diesel generators. The buildings are data centers.

“We’re sort of that model of how not to do this kind of development,” says Schlossberg.

All internet data goes through facilities like these: massive, sometimes multistoried warehouses filled with servers where every webpage and shred of data lives. Demand for these centers has skyrocketed in the last two years as artificial intelligence usage has gone mainstream.

Virginia is a data hot spot. It has the world’s highest concentration of data centers — nearly 600 facilities of varying sizes, including roughly 150 of the largest kind, known as hyperscale data centers. Not all residents are happy about that.

A demand for power and water

As data centers have cropped up alongside residential developments, they have become synonymous with intensive power and water consumption, as well as round-the-clock noise from cooling systems.

A decade ago, Schlossberg learned Amazon Web Services was building a huge data center, the equivalent of more than seven football fields, next to her home in Northern Virginia, and she threw herself into stopping it — unsuccessfully.

“And the data industry came and crushed us,” she said.

Amazon is one of several companies that have made Northern Virginia an epicenter for data: 13% of the world’s data center operational capacity is here.

And the demand for data is growing with the proliferation of AI applications like ChatGPT. There are plans for 70 more data centers in Virginia, many the size of multiple football fields.

If built, they’ll consume so much power that the state’s main utility company, Dominion, is contracted to build 40 gigawatts of new energy capacity for these new centersthat’s nearly three times the state’s current maximum power production.

Dan Diorio, the vice president for state policy at the national Data Center Coalition, a trade group that represents developers and operators behind the centers, said the centers support everything people do online, from the banking app on your phone to storing electronic medical records to running 911 call centers. And the need for them is only growing.

The data center industry is building out as quickly as they can to meet that growth and provide the digital services that we all rely on every day. And so far, we’re still behind,” Diorio said.

Diorio said regulation of future data centers should balance residents’ worries with the economic impact of development — $24 billion in capital investments in Virginia just last year.

“Not every project is the same, but I think as an industry we’re responsive and responsible members of the community when proposing these projects [and] working to address those community concerns,” Diorio said.    (That is BS, they are railroading these projects through doing all they can to keep the public from realizing they are moving in until it is too late to stop them.  They conceal and lie about  what the projects are and about the impacts they will have on the area.  Once they get in, they being to up the anti with additions and/or new construction on the property. When the people rise up and fight against them they are told there is nothing they can do to stop them.)

The rise of a NIMBY movement

Concerns about power and land use, as well as the cost of these data centers, have galvanized not just those worried about the environment but also a widespread not-in-my-backyard movement against them.

And Schlossberg has become the go-to person for how to organize. She reels off the places she has gotten calls from: “I’ve talked to people in Boardman, Oregon; Peculiar, Missouri; Fort Wayne, Indiana; Maryland; Georgia.”

One of those places is Chesapeake, in Virginia’s coastal southeast. Residents of this city of 250,000 learned of a proposed data center project just weeks ago, and they were concerned.

Helen Messer’s Chesapeake house backs up to a small water-retention pond. On the other side of that pond, a couple of hundred feet away, is the proposed data center site.

She’s most worried about the possibility of constant noise from the center’s cooling systems, which typically run around the clock to keep servers from overheating.  (There are so many other factors that people don’t even consider such as the mental, physical and emotional effects of the waves and frequencies flowing through the air, of the chemicals flowing into the waterways from the Data Centers cooling system, or the compounded effects of the supplemental energy systems they choose to employ like windmills, natural gas and oil, and nuclear power plants.)

Within days of the proposal going public, Chesapeake residents held a meeting at a church social hall to prepare their resistance. A representative from the state’s Sierra Club chapter answered questions about data centers elsewhere as residents worried over water usage, pollution and, of course, noise.

The developer behind the data project, Doug Fuller, also showed up.

He got a less-than-warm welcome from residents, including Messer.

Why can’t we move the data center to your neighborhood?” she shouted, to a smattering of applause.

Fuller pushed back, arguing the facility would be a net positive for Chesapeake.

“As a developer, I’ll create an asset for our city. Tax revenues will be in the millions of dollars,” he told an unconvinced crowd.

Fuller also said his effort would help capitalize on a major government investment. For the last couple of decades, cities and counties in southeastern Virginia have struggled to diversify their economies away from tourism and shipbuilding. In the last couple of years, several of these municipalities got together and spent tens of millions of dollars on high-speed fiber-optic networks in hopes of attracting high-tech businesses like data centers.  (It is sad that most people can’t see beyond the promise of $$$ not being able to pause and consider the consequences.  That is how many evil proposals get passed.)

Still, hundreds of Chesapeake residents implored local leaders by email and in person to deny the proposal.

Resident Lee D’Amore, who lives a few blocks from where the data center was proposed, put up red “No Data Center” signs around his neighborhood ahead of a City Council meeting in June.

“Once they’re built, there’s nothing you can do. There’s nothing you can do. If they violate the decibels, what are you going to do? Fine them $1,000? That’d be like me asking you for a penny. Seriously, once this thing is built, it’s all over but the crying,” D’Amore said.

D’Amore and the rest of the anti-data center opposition showed up in force to the council meeting, speaking one after the other against the data center for more than two hours.

I think there are viable areas this could go in our city and could flourish in our city, but I don’t think anything near a residential area is [viable],” Chesapeake City Council Member Amanda Newins said ahead of the vote.

Dozens of opponents of the proposed data center in Chesapeake packed a City Council meeting there in June. Meg Lemaster, one of the organizers of the resistance, shows off stickers opposing the project.  Ryan Murphy/WHRO

When the tallying board lit up to show a unanimous vote blocking the data center, the council chamber erupted with cheers.

Messer and her neighbors were giddy as they poured out of city hall.

“I’ll sleep better than I have for a month,” she said.

As resistance has mounted nationwide, more data center projects are being delayed or outright rejected16 projects nationally between May of last year and this past March, according to a study by Data Center Watch, a research project run by 10a Labs, an AI intelligence company.

But a central tension remains: The use of AI applications is skyrocketing. And the data centers to handle all of that have to go somewhere.

CorrectionJuly 17, 2025

A previous version of this web story and a previous photo caption misspelled Lee D’Amore’s last name as DaMore. The story also incorrectly referred to Data Center Watch as a nonprofit. It is a research project run by 10a Labs.

Screen time is increasing for people over 60. Is that a problem?

Folks over 65 are putting in a lot of screen time. In 2019, the Pew Research Center found that people 60 years and older spend more than half their daily leisure time in front of screens, mostly watching TV or videos. Since the pandemic, that screen time has increased. Is addiction on the rise? And what’s the best use of screen time for any of us? We’re parsing out all the questions with Ipsit Vahia, the Chief of Geriatric Psychiatry at McLean Hospital. 

SPACER

Water is a precious resource. Should we be concerned about the amount that generative AI requires to function?

Deven Dadbhawala/Getty Images

As the tech industry has grown, so too have data centers.

Data centers are enormous buildings filled with hundreds of thousands of computers that store cloud data and power artificial intelligence. To keep up with computing demands, data centers use electricity and sometimes chilled water to keep those computers cool.

The result? A surge in energy and water use that has caught the attention of scientists and lawmakers.

Under the Biden Administration, Congress commissioned a report on data center electricity consumption. Led by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, the 2024 United States Data Center Energy Usage Report forecast that by 2028, U.S. data centers could consume as much as 12% of the nation’s electricity.  

There are no federal nor state regulations for AI and no legal framework requiring tech companies to disclose their energy and water consumption. That’s led scientists like Shaolei Ren to investigate this question independently.

Today, Ren is an associate professor of electrical and computer engineering at the University of California, Riverside. But Ren grew up in a coal mining town in northern China, where water was scarce. He learned how to make every drop count.

“We only had water access for like half an hour each day. So we just had to use water very wisely,” says Ren.

Ren was among the first to study the water footprint of AI. In a 2023 pre-print of a paper, Ren’s team estimated that to train the GPT-3 language model consumed hundreds of thousands of liters of fresh water. That water is evaporated and does not necessarily return to the local watershed.

Meanwhile, the biggest U.S. data center operators have pledged a green future.

GoogleMicrosoft and Meta have all pledged to reach at least net-zero carbon emissions by 2030Amazon has set their net-zero deadline for 2040. All four companies have also pledged to be water positive by 2030, meaning they’d put more water back into the environment than they use. All four companies are financials supporters of NPR, and Amazon also pays to distribute some of NPR’s content.  (BUT, the water they return to our enviroment is no longer natural, pure or free from cotaminents and toxins, nor is necessarily returned where it was taken.  ZERO CARBON sounds so impressive, but it is a hoax and which does not address the environmental damages created by these monstrosities, or the impact on those living around them or working on or in them.)
spacer

NET ZERO – THE FINAL SOLUTION?

WE ARE ALL ONE, Brotherhood not only of man but of every thing on the planet.  They talk about LOVE and ACCEPTANCE.  They talk about PEACE, SAFETY and HARMONY.  UNITY – EQUITY – FREEDOM!  ALL ARE ONE! All that sounds so good.  Sadly, the general masses believe they are talking about us. No, no, no, … Click Here to Read More

ZERO IS THE PLAN! BEWARE!

spacer

ZERO seems to be the WORD of our TIMES.  It is everywhere.  Zero this and Zero that.   It is all over our groceries, its in the news and on the television.  In big, colorful letters so you just can’t miss it.  You can hardly escape it.  That is by design. ZERO is where we are … Click Here to Read More

ZERO IS THE WORD

zero (n.) “figure which stands for naught in the Arabic notation,” also “the absence of all quantity considered as quantity,” c. 1600, from French zéro or directly from Italian zero, from Medieval Latin zephirum, from Arabic sifr “cipher,” translation of Sanskrit sunya-m “empty place, desert, naught” (see cipher (n.)).A brief history of the invention of “zero” can be found here. Meaning “worthless person” is recorded from 1813. … Click Here to Read More

spacer

“I think before generative A.I. came along in late 2022, there was hope among these data center operators that they could go to net zero. I don’t see how you can, under current infrastructure investment plans, you could possibly achieve those net zero goals,” says Benjamin Lee, a professor of electrical and systems engineering at the University of Pennsylvania.

Data center construction is expected to increase.

The day after his second inauguration, President Trump announced a private joint venture to build 20 large data centers across the country. Known as Stargate, the data centers would consume 15 gigawatts of power.

Some legislators have introduced bills to regulate AI. Senator Edward Markey of Massachusetts has introduced a bipartisan bill that would set federal standards and voluntary reporting guidelines to measure the environmental footprint of AI. State lawmakers in California and Connecticut have introduced their own bills.

Meanwhile, tech companies are trying to create and train more sustainable AI models and build cleaner data centers.


Curious about tech and the environment? Email us at shortwave@npr.org — we’d love to hear from you!

Listen to Short Wave on SpotifyApple Podcasts and Google Podcasts.

Listen to every episode of Short Wave sponsor-free and support our work at NPR by signing up for Short Wave+ at plus.npr.org/shortwave.

Today’s episode was produced by Hannah Chinn and edited by Rebecca Ramirez. Tyler Jones checked the facts. Jimmy Keeley was the audio engineer. Special thanks to Brent Baughman, Johannes Doerge, at the NPR Standards team.

spacer

Loudoun Community Meeting: Data Centers & Diesel Generators

March 28, 2023 6:00 pm – 7:30 pm

Join PEC for an informational session to learn about the power usage of local data centers, the generators they operate in and around the Loudoun community, and the anticipated air quality variance likely to be issued by the Department of Environmental Quality for this summer.

Loudoun County is the data center capital of the world, hosting 70% of the world’s internet traffic in Ashburn’s Data Center Alley. With these data centers come over 4,000 commercial-sized on-site diesel generators, utilized for back-up power when the grid experiences high stress, such as in the summer months.

Diesel generators emit relatively high levels of nitrogen oxides, carbon monoxide, particulate matter and sulfur, all of which have environmental and human health implications.

Because data centers have been proliferating rapidly in the past few years, Dominion Energy has struggled to meet the massive electricity transmission needs. Just last year it announced it will be unable to provide enough electricity to data centers in Loudoun County through at least 2025.

In response, the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) is proposing an order and local variance to allow data centers in Loudoun to operate their generators more frequently and for longer durations through July 2023.

This order is not only short-sighted in addressing the grid constraints, but it has the potential to do real damage. Many of our schools, sports fields, playgrounds and homes are located near data center complexes, and there is real potential for localized air pollution and regional greenhouse emissions with the increased use of these diesel generators. Air pollutants such as ozone and particulate matter increase the amount and seriousness of lung and heart disease and other health problems, particularly for children, the elderly and those with pre-existing conditions (asthma, pregnancy, COPD, etc.).

Location: Ashburn Library – Meeting Room C
43316 Hay Road
Ashburn, VA 20147

spacer

FOX 2 Detroit
759 views
3 months ago

 

Data center deep dive: A look at metro Detroit proposals & why the area is prime for AI developments

WXYZ – Mike Duffey /  June 8, 2026

The following very important snipets were taken from the artice by the title shown above.  You can read the entire article HERE




We know that since the PANDEMIC, Bill Gates has been GOBBLING UP FARMLAND as fast as lightning!!  Now we learn that OpenAI Data Centers really want to be placed on FARMLAND.  ISN’T THAT AMAZING??  It would be great to be able to uncover how many of these AIData Center Sites are already going up on Gates Farms.  However, you will NEVER KNOW.  He keeps everything tightly under wraps, buried in conglomerations, Phony Philanthropy, GOOD BUDDY agreements, NGOs, and international contracts to guarantee he will not be exposed.  

spacer

The real reason why Bill Gates is now the US’ biggest farmland owner

Sales of more than a thousand acres are “blue-moon events,” O’Keefe noted, so this one stood out. And Eastern Washington has some of the richest, most expensive farmland in the country. But the purchaser of record was a small, obscure company in Louisiana.

“That immediately set off alarm bells,” O’Keefe says.

He assigned his research team to dig a little deeper. Soon they came back with the answer: The Louisiana company was acting on behalf of Cascade Investment LLC, the secretive investment firm that manages most of the huge fortune belonging to Bill Gates.

O’Keefe knew Gates had been acquiring farmland for years, mostly through various Cascade subsidiaries. The mogul’s holdings include large tracts in Illinois, Iowa, Louisiana, California, and about a dozen other states. With the Washington state acreage and other recent additions to his portfolio, O’Keefe calculated, Gates now owns at least 242,000 acres of American farmland.

Bill Gates, co-founder of Microsoft, has an alter ego,” O’Keefe wrote: “Farmer Bill, the guy who owns more farmland than anyone else in America.”

The Land Report scoop made headlines. Many stories focused on Gates’ longstanding interest in climate change and sustainability and suggested those concerns might be driving the land purchases. Newsweek called him a “sustainable agriculture champion.”


He’s the new MacDonald:
 Bill Gates owns hundreds of thousands of acres across the United States — including 242,000 acres of farmland — making him the country’s top agricultural landholder, according to Eric O’Keefe’s The Land Report.NY Post graphic/Mike Guillen

Those stories dovetailed with earlier reports about Gates’ large land acquisitions in Arizona. Most notably, in 2017, the Gates-affiliated Mt. Lemmon Holdings invested in some 40 square miles of “transitional” land on the western fringe of the Phoenix sprawl. (According to The Land Report, Gates owns about 27,000 acres of non-agricultural land, in addition to his farm holdings.)

Some partners in the Arizona project issued a press release touting plans to build “a forward-thinking community … that embraces cutting-edge technology.” There was talk of “high-speed digital networks” and “autonomous logistics hubs.” That was all it took for many in the media to conclude that Gates was personally engineering the city of the future.

Bill Gates has started laying out his plans for creating a ‘smart city’ in Phoenix, Arizona,” science-news outlet Futurism wrote. This high-tech metropolis “could be both a breeding and testing ground for futuristic technologies.”

In reality, the idea that Bill Gates was single-handedly reinventing farming — or designing cities of tomorrow — was almost entirely speculation.

“There’s a tendency in the media to personalize this,” O’Keefe says. “People want to know, ’Why does Bill Gates want all this land?’ ”

But hyper-wealthy people like Gates don’t make every decision personally, O’Keefe notes. “He has very competent investment managers.”

Given that Gates is the third-richest person in the world — with an estimated net worth of $132 billion, he falls in behind Tesla founder Elon Musk and Amazon’s Jeff Bezos — those money managers have their hands full.

Investment guru Michael Larson, who has worked with Gates since 1994, runs the Washington-based Cascade Investment, as well as supervising the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation’s nearly $50 billion endowment.


Bill Gates (with Terra Power board member Nathan Myhrvold) is well known for supporting environmental innovation, but his farming plans were more secretive — until now.Bloomberg via Getty Images

“The arrangement is simple,” The Wall Street Journal wrote in a 2014 profile. “Mr. Larson makes money, and Mr. Gates gives it away.”

Larson and his team are famously tight-lipped. Cascade employees almost never speak to the press. According to the Journal, they are even discouraged from using Facebook and other social-media platforms. (Through a spokesperson, the company declined to comment for this article.)

Larson sees to it that Gates’ wealth is sensibly, even conservatively, invested. According to public records, the billionaire’s portfolio includes shares in Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway conglomerate, a Coca-Cola bottling company, and the tractor manufacturer Deere & Co., among other non-flashy investments.

Eric O’Keefe, of The Land Report magazine

Larson also makes sure Gates keeps his eggs in a wide variety of baskets. His portfolio is diversified, in other words. And that’s where the land purchases come in. (Boy don’t we know that, if there is anything evil…GATES has his hands, pockets, wallet and bank account in it.)

Most of us imagine farmers tilling the soil that has been in their families for generations. (Not anymore, those REAL Farmers have all been driven out of business. Those were the ‘Good ‘ole Days’ and sadly they will never be seen again, at least not if the TECHNOCRATS have their way.)
spacer

THERE IS NO FOOD LIKE OUR OLD FOOD

GOD HELP US ALL!  WE ARE AT THE DOOR OF THE APOCALYPSE!!  FOOD IS THEIR MAJOR WEAPON. We have been warning you, the elite have been telling you they are moving you into a new way of eating.  They tell you it is to save the EARTH.  THEY ARE LIARS! Please folks if you do … Click Here to Read More

spacer
But many farmers lease at least some of the land they cultivate. According to Bruce Sherrick, a professor of agricultural economics at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, about 60 percent of row-crop farmland in the Midwest is leased. The landowners can include investors like Gates.

For investors who know what they’re doing, agricultural land offers financial stability in uncertain times.

“Farmland has had a remarkably consistent ability to hedge against inflation,” Sherrick says.   (Land ownership is the only safeguard of FREEDOM)

LOSING The Right That Guarantees Your Freedom!

Restored: 8/22/22 Those around the world who are standing for freedom, are looking to US to STAND! Everyone is screaming about their rights…  Women’s Rights, Victims Rights, LGBTQ Rights,  Gender Identification Rights, The Right to Kill the Unborn, Animal Rights, Immigration Rights, Intellectual Property Rights, etc… SADLY, people fail to recognize that the MOST IMPORTANT … Click Here to Read More

 

And it tends to be “negatively correlated” against other investments, he adds: If the stock market is going down, the return on farmland is likely to be going up.

But farmland isn’t easy to buy.


Bill Gates’ portfolio even includes shares in John Deere.Alamy

“You can’t just say, I’ve got $30,000 saved up and I want to buy some farmland,” Sherrick notes. Large investors usually work with expert advisors to help them acquire and manage their agricultural holdings.

According to press reports, Gates’ farmland empire is mostly managed by a Cascade subsidiary called Cottonwood Ag Management. But the details are murky, and there is no evidence that the billionaire’s farmland-buying spree is driven by anything more than a desire to have a well-diversified portfolio.

“When Ted Turner bought his Flying D Ranch in Montana in 1989, that was his personal passion,” O’Keefe says. “Bill Gates’ land purchases look to me more like sensible long-term holds run by experienced asset managers.”

The same logic likely holds for Gates’ Arizona acquisitions. The largest parcel, a proposed 24,800-acre development known as Belmont, might someday contain 80,000 homes, along with offices, retail, industrial and logistics facilities. At least that’s what the developers partnered with Gates’ investment group have promised.

For now, though, all that “smart city” talk is more than a little premature. As Slate financial writer Henry Grabar concluded, the proposed town of Belmont is “not a city, nor is it ‘smart,’ nor does the Microsoft founder appear to be involved in any meaningful way.”


Gates’ largest parcel of land is a proposed 24,800-acre development known as Belmont in Arizona.Google Maps

But, while Belmont might not be a smart city, it still looks like a smart investment.

The region west of Phoenix is booming. The nearby community of Buckeye has grown more than tenfold in the last 20 years. And the Belmont property is located along Interstate 10, the region’s major east-west artery, making it an excellent location for Amazon-style (or AMAZON SIZE) warehouse complexes.

There’s also a proposal to build a new interstate linking Phoenix to Las Vegas. That proposed superhighway would run across a 5-mile stretch of the Belmont property. The project isn’t yet funded. But if it ever gets built, it would boost the value of Gates’ land dramatically.

Today, the Belmont tract remains mostly empty desert. Most likely, it is just one more asset in Gates’ vast portfolio, quietly appreciating in value while the billionaire himself remains at arm’s length.  (Plenty of room out there for a huge OPEN AI Data Center all they have to do is figure out how to keep the computers cool.)

People involved in the Gates financial empire stress that the family’s philanthropic endeavors are kept separate from their investments and business ventures. But some of the software pioneer’s investments do reveal his grander goals.
(The truth is his “Philanthropic” endeavors are all about his investments and business ventures and vice versa. Philanthropy has become a ruse the rich use to cover their evil plots, schemes and profiteering.)

 

RED NOSE DAY 2021

It is almost time for the SCAM knowns as RED NOSE DAY.  I know everybody thinks it is a fun way to provide necessities to helpless children…  Hopefully once you finish this post you will believe something totally different. DO NOT BUY INTO THE RED NOSE DAY PROMOTION.  DO NOT DON A RED NOSE. When … Click Here to Read More

spacer

Gates — who stepped down from day-to-day involvement with Microsoft in 2008 (that does not mean he left control or that he is not at all involved.  Just that he is not there in an office on a daily basis.) — has long been looking for ways to help the world’s poorest and to address the planet’s environmental challenges.


Gates has invested in plant-based substitutes like Impossible Foods and Beyond Meat, which one day hope to rival the beef industry.  (Actually, he hopes to replace real meat altogether, using synthetics, bugs and poop.) NurPhoto via Getty Images

Scientific Breakthrough for Animal Lovers!

spacer

HOLY COW!  This is the ultimate.  If this does not demonstrate the stupidity level of our current society, I don’t know what does.  Brainwashed and mindless they follow the trends and buy the lie.  This guy says that “WE” have created a false concept that meat means animals.  Really? I mean Really?  How foolish of … Click Here to Read More

 

In 2006, he helped launch TerraPower, a company developing a new type of compact, ultra-safe nuclear reactor. In a recent episode of “60 Minutes,” Gates explained that zero-carbon energy sources like nuclear power are vital in reducing the emissions that warm the atmosphere.  (LOL ya and we have already seen OPENAI DATA CENTERS require nuclear power plants.)

“Without innovation, we will not solve climate change,” Gates said. “We won’t even come close.”

Since 2016, Gates has led Breakthrough Energy Ventures, a venture-capital fund that invests in clean-technology startups. The fund recently raised $1 billion, which it is pouring into companies developing hydrogen-fueled airplanes, zero-carbon building materials, and other green innovations.

His environmental bent also extends to farming. Gates has invested in Impossible Foods and Beyond Meat, two companies producing beef substitutes, including the Impossible Burger. In his new book, “How to Avoid a Climate Disaster,” Gates explains why raising beef cattle causes more harmful emissions than other forms of agriculture. He hopes plant-based substitutes will allow us to “cut down on meat eating while still enjoying the taste of meat.”  (artificially flavored and textured)

 
Eric O’Keefe (left), editor of The Land Report, broke the news on Gates’ farmland shopping spree. Michael Larson (right), chief investment officer of Cascade Investment LLC, likely bought the land as a smart asset.Twitter; Getty Images

And the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation recently launched a new division known as Gates Ag One. It aims to help poor farmers, especially in Africa and South Asia, get the “tools, technologies, and resources they need to lift themselves out of poverty.” If each acre can produce more food, that’s good news for farmers. But it also means we can devote less of the planet’s surface to farmland, which is good news for forests and ecosystems.     Making more land available for Data Centers
spacer

SHOWS YOU JUST HOW MUCH THEY HATE US!!

spacer

If you have not been paying attention to the “advances” in the world of “nutrition”, agriculture, technology and lab created foods… you probably need to look into it. The ruling elite believe that you are their property.  Now that they have perfected their technology, they see you as useless eaters.  IF they must feed you, … Click Here to Read More

Meanwhile, American agriculture today is being transformed as farmers employ new technologies and Big Data to help them manage their crops. That can mean better yields with decreased use of fertilizers and pesticides. Which in turn means less impact on the environment.

Farms also have a role in fighting climate change. With proper techniques, the carbon from decaying plant matter can be kept safely in the soil, rather than entering the atmosphere in the form of carbon dioxide.

 

That is not how Photosynthesis works!!!!  The image below tells you how God designed the system.

spacer

A new coalition of farmland owners, operators and environmental groups is working to come up with verifiable standards for sustainable farming. The group is called Leading Harvest, and the Gates-linked Cottonwood Ag is one of its founding members.

Leading Harvest envisions a kind of sustainability seal of approval certifying that a given farm meets environmental standards. The program could be an economic boon for farmers.

In the future, farmers will be paid for sustainability,” says Sherrick, who sits on the group’s board. There will be incentives for things like using less water, fewer chemicals, and storing more carbon.


The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation recently launched an outreach division to farmers in Africa — now Gates could transform farming in America.Alamy

The group’s founding members are expected to spearhead the rollout of the new standards on their own lands.

Whether or not Gates personally directed Cottonwood Ag to get involved in the Leading Harvest project, the move makes both environmental and business sense.

The new green economy will mean new opportunities for land owners,” O’Keefe believes.

Farming is all of a sudden part of the solution and not just part of the problem,” Sherrick adds. He sees Gates’ involvement — even if indirect — as crucial in encouraging the industry to embrace the new sustainability standard.

If the nation’s largest farmland owner can show that farming can be both sustainable and profitable, that will make a big difference.  Natural farming has no guarantees.  All farms go through times when they lose money for the year or more.  BIG BUSINESS DOES NOT LIKE THAT.  THEY WANT PROFIT EVERY YEAR AND MORE PROFIT THIS YEAR THAN THE YEAR BEFORE, ALWAYS.  They don’t like having to deal with getting permission or approval, they don’t like restrictions or limitations, they don’t like having to worry about what people need, think or feel.  They want the INDUSTRY to move always ahead and the money to flow into their pockets.  No room for variables or unknowns.  THEY MUST CONTROL EVERYTHING!

“People are going to pay attention to what Bill is doing,” Sherrick says.  I wish people would pay attention to what he is doing and not just what he says he is doing.  

James B. Meigs is the co-host of the “How Do We Fix It?” podcast and the former editor-in-chief of Popular Mechanics.

 

 

Why is Bill Gates buying farmland?

Gates is just using farmland to make Agri-Tech and financial investments (like Data Centers). Owning farmland is one of the most prudent financial investments to make now. Farmland as an investment offers low volatility.

Who owns the most farm ground in the US?

Bill Gates is America’s biggest farmer, at 269000 acres farmland grows potatoes and carrots

Bill and Melinda Gates — prior to their divorce — accumulated roughly 270,000 acres of farmland in less than a decade.

  • Gates has farmlands in Louisiana, Nebraska, Georgia, Arizona, California and other areas.
  • The report states that Gates has 70,000 acres of land in North Louisiana where they grow soybeans, corn, cotton.
  • Bill Gates’ purchased of a large patch of land in North Dakota has sparked fury and conspiracy theories on social media after the Microsoft billionaire secured legal approval to purchase the 2,100 acres of farmland in the state last week.

How much farmland does Jeff Bezos own?

420,000 acres
 Amazon founder and chairman Jeff Bezos has amassed 420,000 acres in recent years. Other noteworthy farmland investors include Ted Turner and Thomas Peterffy.

 

Who owns the most acres in Michigan?

Michigan. Plum Creek, headquartered in Seattle, Washington, is the largest private landowner in Michigan after purchasing 650,000 acres in 2005.

Who owns the land in Detroit?

The Detroit Land Bank Authority (DLBA) is a public authority that owns and manages approximately 100,000 parcels of property in the City of Detroit making it the city’s largest landowner

Who owns the most property in Detroit Michigan?

So while Dan Gilbert owns the most property downtown, his 30-odd buildings seem small compared to what Kelly, Tatarian, Moroun, and others own. But unlike those men, Gilbert has plans to redevelop his properties and not just sit on them.

Who owns farmland in Michigan?

Here in Michigan, roughly 1.35 million acres of ag land is held by foreign investors and nearly 90% of this land is in forests. Investors from the Netherlands own 33% of that land with Canadians owning 25%. The counties with the most total acres of foreign-owned ag land are Keweenaw, Baraga and Alger.

Who owns the most farmland in Michigan?

What does Weyerhaeuser have to do with Michigan? Weyerhaeuser purchaseD Plum Creek in 2015 for over $8 Billion! That purchase of Plum Creek makes Weyerhaeuser the largest private landowner in Michigan, as of now.

How much US land is owned by China?

At the turn of this century, Chinese owners owned about 192,000 acres of farmland in the U.S., according to the USDA. By 2019, the USDA says foreign ownership of U.S. acres exceeded 35.2 million acres, a 60 percent increase from the decade prior.

Does China own land in Michigan?

Now Chinese companies and businessmen are planning to make their home in the United StatesThe mainland Chinese company Sino-Michigan Properties LLC has paid $1.9 million for 200 acres of undeveloped land in Milan, Michigan

 

‘Too late’ to stop $1B data center near Milan, supervisor says amid resident furor

Other residents tried to understand how the rezoning was not related to the data center, but they were told they could wait to speak about non-agenda items at the end of the meeting. At one point, a resident left the building in frustration and did not return.

Rebecca Williams, who has lived in Augusta Township for 13 years, said she felt the meeting was disrespectful and the board belittled attendees. At one point, Waller asked someone to get him a crayon when trying to spell out the rezoning to resident Rodney Taylor.

“You need a bib too,” Waller said.

“I’m incredibly uncomfortable with that,” Williams said. “I don’t think they want us to come to these meetings.”

When asked about why the data center was not an agenda item, even though the company that wants to build the data center proposed the rezoning, Waller repeated the horse and cart analogy. “These people are coming in to rezone some property,” he said.

Trustees said residents should have showed up sooner, when the data center was being proposed. Now they said it was too late to make an impact.

Residents spoke at length against the data center at a township planning commission meeting earlier this month. The planning commission recommended the Board of Trustees deny the rezoning.

“We don’t have anyone show up until the 11th hour. (The) 11th hour is too late to come here, “Trustee Linda Adams said. “Get involved before, not the 11th hour.”

As of right now, the way the laws are written, I don’t see anything that they can necessarily do,” Waller said.

How much US farmland is owned by China?

China’s American agricultural land holdings have increased over tenfold in the last decade, and at the beginning of 2020, investments from China held $2 billion of American agricultural land.

Who is the largest landowner in the world?

Roman Catholic Church: 70 million hectares
The largest landowner in the world is not a major oil magnate or a real estate investor. No, it’s the Roman Catholic Church. According to lovemoney.com, the church owns more than 70 million hectares.

Who owns the most land in the world 2021?

With her 6.6 billion acres, Elizabeth II is far and away the world’s largest landowner, with the closest runner-up (King Abdullah) holding control over a mere 547 million, or about 12% of the lands owned by Her Majesty, The Queen.

Story by Jordyn Pair, mlive.com
 • 3mo

spacer

A guide to Michigan grassroots’ fight against AI data centers

November 7, 2025|ai, data centers, economic development, grassroots action, statewide, water

Augusta Township, image by Wendy Albers

AI data center projects are setting their sights on Michigan’s water and farmland (and power grid), but local grassroots communities are fighting back–and they’re winning. (Well, they are, so far, holding them back.)

As we stand at the cusp of the much hyped AI buildout, it seems inevitable that the technocrats would come for Michigan’s abundant water resources, sooner or later. The only surprise is that it didn’t happen sooner. There are six major AI data center greenfield developments currently on the table in southern Michigan right now, with more surely on the horizon:

  1. Saline Township is facing “Project Stargate,” a $7B OpenAI project on which Governor Whitmer has hung her star;
  2. Ypsilanti is facing the Los Alamos / University of Michigan government surveillance supercomputer;
  3. Augusta Charter Township residents, south of Ann Arbor, have sent the zoning of Thor Equities’ AI data center to a referendum vote;
  4. Howell Township is facing a 1,000 acre AI development by an undisclosed developer;
  5. Dundee Village  is battling a proposal by Cloverleaf Infrastructure; and
  6. Pavilion Township has been battling a project by Franklin Partners near Kalamazoo.

In each of these communities, there is widespread and fierce resident opposition to the AI buildout. Emboldened by a recent string of victories against taxpayer-funded industrial megasites, Michigan’s grassroots community is as strong as ever. South Michiganders have already racked up some major victories against these destructive developments. In two of these communities, the developer has withdrawn their application to local townships, and in one, the zoning decision has been put to a voter referendum.

Let’s take a look at what’s going on, what’s worked, what hasn’t worked, and what local grassroots communities can do to continue the fight. But first, let’s stop to understand why there’s so much pushback against the AI buildout.

What are AI data centers, and why are residents so concerned?

We’re used to data centers in the US; we’ve had them around, and they’ve been steadily increasing, since the internet boom of the 90s. They’re the warehouses which store servers and other large computer processors which power the internet and cloud services. What we are not accustomed to are AI data centers. Standard data centers pale in comparison to the processing power which AI data centers require, and all that processing power requires two things: water for cooling, and energy. AI data centers consume between 1-10 million gallons of water per day, and their energy consumption can rise higher than that of entire cities. Neighbors of Meta’s new AI data centers in Georgia claim they can’t drink the water. Many other communities where AI data centers have moved in next door have complained about widespread, elongated power outages, as the centers strain the grid and utility companies prioritize the data centers. AI data centers have been linked to water contamination, well depletion, and toxic fires.

All risk, no reward

Economically speaking, these data centers offer little to no long-term benefits. They generate very few long-term jobs, compared to the size of the investment and federal and state subsidies they’re being given. Even worse: these projects are actually job killers. AI data centers are being used to power technology which large corporations intend to use to replace millions of human jobs over the next five years. Amazon’s recent layoffs are a taste of the vision these AI technocrats want to accomplish.

Furthermore, the only remaining financial benefit of having these facilities for a neighbor–tax revenue to local, state, and federal–is being undercut by federal CHIPS and state tax breaks.

Less service, less freedom

In practical terms, AI is not bringing the improvements to the average person’s quality of life, which we were promised. AI is automating insurance claim denial, among a host of other customer service roles, creating even more barriers between customers and the services they pay for. AI tools like ChatGPT commit open copyright violation, stealing work from artists and writers carte blanche, making it even more difficult for creatives to make a living. Social media feeds are filled with AI generated slop content which blurs the line of reality to an already vulnerable and anxious audience. And elongated, isolated use of AI chatbots is causing a new trend of AI psychosis, which has already been linked to multiple suicides and homicides.

Meanwhile, companies like Palantir and OpenAI have developed contracts with the US government to use AI to conduct constant surveillance on US citizens and drone warfare overseas.

The AI buildout seems to be bringing us people less freedom, less quality of life, and less financial opportunity. Whoever is benefitting from this “much needed” expansion, it’s not we free people of Earth.

And Michiganders know it.

The AI data center buildout in Michigan

Just as with the last round of SOAR-funded Manufacturing 4.0 megasite projects, all of the current proposed AI data center projects are greenfield developments targeting farmland. At best, they would destroy hundreds of acres of farmland; at worst they would destroy over 1,000 acres of farmland, forest, and savannah habitat. With an average of 5 million gallons of water per day, the six sites could together consume well over 30 million gallons of water per day from Michigan’s aquifers.

Unlike the MEDC’s rash of megasites from 2022 and 2023, most of these AI data center buildouts aren’t being directly subsidized by taxpayers (with the exception of the Ypsilanti Los Alamos project). All of them are, however, benefitting from tax breaks from the federal CHIPS act and from state laws which were passed in December of 2024.

1) Saline–”Project Stargate” with OpenAI

Status: ACTIVE

Governor Whitmer herself has given her blessing to this $7B hyperscale AI data center, giving it the ominous title “Project Stargate”. This facility, slated for agricultural Saline, is being developed by a partnership of OpenAI, Oracle, and Related Digital. Stephen Ross is the billionaire developer who owns Related Digital, and who has been a heavy financial patron to his alma mater, University of Michigan.

The 250 acre greenfield site that’s been targeted is in the middle of a quiet residential-agricultural community just south of Ann Arbor; it’s currently occupied by 31 individual owners, whose land use is residential and agricultural.

The township board voted 4-1 to deny rezoning the site to industrial, at the developers’ request. Developers OpenAI, Oracle, and Related Digital responded by suing the township. The board has caved to what residents have described as “bullying,” and have settled on an agreement to the project, with minor concessions.

Since then, DTE has struck an agreement with the developers to increase total demand by 25%, adding 1.4 gigawatts–the equivalent of an entire nuclear power plant. DTE plans to spend $6B over the next five years on infrastructure to serve the data center, $2B of which will allegedly be paid for by the data center developer. DTE claims rates for residents will not increase.

Michigan Public Service Commission, our state’s utility regulatory agency, must approve this deal with DTE–an approval process which, by law, requires a public hearing. DTE has recently requested MPSC waive public hearings for their applications for the Project Stargate AI expansions. Michigan’s Attorney General Dana Nessel denied the request in early November, requiring a full formal public hearing and testimony from DTE.

Learn more about the project HERE.

2) Ypsilanti – Los Alamos / U of M supercomputer

Status: ACTIVE

In December 2024, Michigan’s House and Senate Appropriations Committees voted to approve $100M in taxpayer funding for a new Los Alamos National Laboratory AI data center to be built, in partnership with the University of Michigan, in quaint Ypsilanti. This was done, according to Ypsilanti’s Township supervisor, without the knowledge of either local residents or elected officials.

Los Alamos National Laboratory is the US Department of Energy government research facility which was responsible for the development of the atomic bomb, among many other warfare related technologies. The Hydro Park lab is slated, according to Los Alamos, “to support drone warfare and surveillance activities”.

Ypsilanti Township officials, who were initially in favor of what they thought was slated to be a small, 26 acre research facility, have since expressed strong negative sentiment towards the 225 acre government supercomputer greenfield development, and towards University of Michigan’s conduct. Local officials claim that the public ivy league university misled them about the size and scope of the project, and their representatives acted in deliberate bad faith. The site borders the Huron River and currently provides critical savannah habitat to a wide range of wildlife.

In a June letter, Supervisor Brenda Stumbo stated that the developers “are not to be trusted and do not do what is best for the community, the people, or the environment. They do what is best for them, and their money grabbing purchase of land should scare the hell out of all elected officials across the state.” To make matters worse: Article VIII Section 5 of Michigan’s constitution exempts schools such as University of Michigan from local zoning regulation. This means that the Hydro Park Los Alamos project isn’t subject to the township and county’s zoning regulations.

In August, township officials adopted a resolution which urged the developer to relocate the project into what they considered to be a more industrial district. In October, Ypsilanti City Council unanimously passed a resolution opposing the AI supercomputer. Local residents have been actively fighting against the data center at local meetings.

Learn more about the project and local action HERE.

3) Augusta Township – Thor Equities 

Status: ZONING PUT TO REFERENDUM

In Augusta Township, an agricultural and residential community south of Ann Arbor, local residents have been fighting a 800+ acre AI data center project proposed by Thor Equities. The greenfield development required rezoning from agricultural to industrial–a rezoning which the township’s planning commission rejected, but which the board approved in July, in spite of the planning commission’s recommendation.

Local residents have been at odds with some members of the Township board.

Since then, local grassroots efforts have successfully petitioned a referendum on the board’s rezoning decision. Volunteer activists delivered nearly 1,000 signatures to the clerk, over 800 of which were formally verified. The issue of whether or not to rezone for the AI data center will now go to the ballot for voters to decide in 2026.

Learn more about the project HERE.

4) Howell – “Project Splitrock” (undisclosed)

Status: ACTIVE

An undisclosed developer has been pursuing an AI data center project titled “Splitrock” on a 1,077 acre greenfield site in agricultural Howell Township. Residents of the community found out in August, and by mid September, local grassroots were flooding town hall meetings regarding the developer’s zoning request.

The zoning request to allow the Van Gilder family’s farm to be turned into a “research and technology” site would have required the township to make changes to their master plan, which made no allowances for such heavy industrial zoning uses.

On September 23rd, after public comments opposing the data center which stretched past 2AM, Howell Township’s planning commission rejected the request to change their master plan and allow the data center. The project’s development application is set to be heard by the township board mid November. Livingston County planning director has been told the developer “wants to reevaluate the project”.

Meanwhile, grassroots efforts continue, as a petition to place a six month moratorium on data center applications has reached over 1,600 signatures, and Howell’s township board is set to consider the proposal on November 20th.

Learn more about the Howell project and local efforts HERE.

5) Dundee Village – Cloverleaf Infrastructure

Status: WITHDRAWN

The farm community of Dundee Village, in Monroe County, has been battling a large AI data center greenfield development spearheaded by Cloverleaf Development. The 750 acre site would, presumably, be developed as a turnkey AI data center site for a major tech company like Google, Meta, Amazon, or Microsoft.

Residents were quick to express their concerns to local officials. In October, both Milan Township and Dundee Village rejected Cloverleaf’s development agreement, which cut the project off from the public water and sewer utilities on which the AI data center was going to rely. Since then, the developer has withdrawn its development agreement, stating they “should have done more public communication and listening” before moving forward with the project.

Still, local grassroots remain vigilant against Cloverleaf or other future potential efforts by AI data center developers.

Learn more about the project HERE.

6) Pavilion Township – Franklin Partners

Status: WITHDRAWN

Real estate development firm Franklin Partners set their sights on 265 acres of farmland in agricultural Pavilion Township, just outside of Kalamazoo, in fall of 2025. The planned AI data center greenfield development would have required Pavilion Township to make changes to its master plan in order to accommodate the heavy industrial zoning.

But local residents quickly formed a grassroots movement and began expressing concerns to township officials. By September, town halls were filled. By November, the developer withdrew their request to the township. Still, local residents remain watchful for activity from Franklin Partners, or from other developers.

Learn more about the project and local efforts HERE.

In summary

Howell, Pavillion, Dundee, and Augusta have all made solid progress forward in fending off their data centers, and they have a good likelihood of success if each community keeps its foot on the gas. Saline is facing significant obstacles against its “Project Stargate,” and Ypsilanti is battling the double goliath of U of M and the Department of Energy combined. These communities will need the help of the others. Their paths to victory are narrower, and more difficult–but they very much exist.

Other communities facing inevitable future data center developments would do well to study these communities, to learn, and to become proactive in expressing your concerns to local, state, and federal governments.

Next steps for grassroots communities

Howell’s grassroots are making great progress on a moratorium on future AI data center proposals; this is a great next step for communities whose developer has withdrawn their application. The more communities can collaborate and share resources with one another, the more successful each will be.

For communities that aren’t facing a project yet, but who are concerned about their community being targeted for AI development, there are a few steps you can take now:

  1. Speak with your local township and/or county officials about local zoning. Does it currently allow for “research and technology” heavy industrial development? Is the language clear?
  2. If your township or county does allow for this type of development, push for the zoning ordinance and/or master plan to be changed or amended. If it doesn’t allow for this, talk with your elected officials about what ordinances could be added to shore up against AI data centers.
  3. Ask your local board to sign a one year moratorium on considering any applications for AI data center development, to give the board time to research the potential impacts of such a project.
  4. Call and email all your elected legislators, both state and federal, and tell them that you are opposed to these types of AI data center developments, and that you support maintaining strong local zoning control
  5. Call and email the US Department of Energy; tell them that you are opposed to the AI buildout, as it does not serve the best interest of the American people

If you know about another AI data center development in Michigan, or if you have specific questions, feel free to REACH OUT.

spacer

AI CHATBOT and GPT Advancements that are DEADLY

Unless you use them yourself or you have children that do, you probably don’t know very much about chatbots.  It is a subject with which you really should become familiar.  Why?  Because today’s computers are becoming more and more invasive and less and less in your control.  In fact, I would say that you have … Click Here to Read More

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE – Updates 2025

THERE IS A NEW ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE THAT HAS DEVELOPED FAR BEYOND THE AI WE HAVE KNOWN UNTIL NOW.  AI  IS GAINING ON EVERY LEVEL VERY RAPIDLY; THERE HAVE BEEN MAJOR CHANGES AND YOU NEED TO BE AWARE!  THERE IS VERY LITTLE THAT EVEN THE “EXPERT” KNOW ABOUT ITS TRUE CAPABILITIES OR IS HIDDEN ACTIVITIES. FOLKS … Click Here to Read More

spacer